| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. G. E. Vandenberg | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his narrative reason for discharge be changed to show he was released from active duty due to physical disability.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that a foot problem interfered with his ability to serve. He states that since his military occupational specialty (MOS) was undergoing a conversion because of manpower reductions, he was told it would be in his best interest to request a discharge. He states that he was told if he did not request the voluntary discharge he would be given a “bad discharge.”
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The records in the applicant’s Official Personnel Military File (OMPF) and Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) are limited and do not contain any medical records.
The applicant entered active duty on 28 November 1990. He completed basic training and advanced individual training with an award of the MOS of 13N10 (Lance Missile Crewmember) and was assigned to Germany. While serving in this MOS, he received notification that the MOS was being phased out and was notified of his options. He elected the early separation option. The documents completed with this election included a statement (which he initialed) that he would lose several benefits including entitlement to the Montgomery G. I. Bill education benefits.
The applicant was released from active duty on 10 April 1992 with a reserve obligation termination date of 24 June 1998 and a reentry code of 2. The narrative reason for his release is shown as, “Directed by the Secretary of the Army” with a separation code of MFF (voluntary discharge, reduction in forces).
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board and was denied a change of his narrative reason for separation on 14 December 2001.
There are no service medical records or copies of the applicant’s entrance or exit physicals in the available records.
The applicant submits a 1996 letter from his former company commander. The commander states that he recalls that the applicant was experiencing problems with pain in his back and feet. The applicant had been placed on a profile and took an alternative Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). He does not recall if the applicant was seen by a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) contract German doctor or by Army doctors.
A 1995 chiropractic report states that the applicant was found to have flat feet which caused him problems while participating in high school sports and during his military service. It also indicates that the applicant was involved in an automobile accident that exacerbated his low back condition. The date of the accident is not of record nor are there any documents that would indicate that the accident occurred while the applicant was on active duty.
The applicant submits a 1997 private medical statement showing care for and a diagnosis of pelvic segmental dysfunction complicated by cervicocranial syndrome, a condition pertaining to pain in the neck and head most frequently caused by misalignment of the cervical spine.
The applicant also submits a copy of a 12 September 2001 evaluation of his back showing major displacement of his spine at several locations.
Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 3-2a(5)b(1) provides that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred or aggravated illness or injury; rather, it is provided to soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.
Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.
Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.
2. There is no evidence of record that the applicant was suffering from medical problems to the extent that he was unable to perform his assigned duties.
3. The applicant's continued performance of duty raised a presumption of fitness which he has not overcome by evidence of any unfitting, acute, grave illness or injury concomitant with his separation.
4. More importantly, the applicant has not demonstrated that his military career was interrupted by reason of a physical disability. There is no evidence that he was not performing his assigned duties or that he would not have been permitted to cross train into another MOS had he so elected.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RVO__ __EJA___ __RKS __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062601 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020131 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.02 |
| 2. | 108.01 |
| 3. | 108.03 |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2007-078
She told the applicant that he could submit a request to withdraw his retirement request, but under Article 12.C.11.c. The Coast Guard also stated the following in that letter: The Coast Guard Personnel Command approved [the applicant’s] requested retirement date of November 1, 2005. The applicant then requested to withdraw his retirement request, but the Coast Guard denied it.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013423
The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); his DVA Rating Decisions, dated 9 July 2007 and 27 November 2007; his service medical records (SMRs); and his DVA medical records, in support of his application. The applicant's SMRs show continuous treatment of his LBP and neck pain until his discharge. Although the applicant's LBP condition is well documented in his SMRs, there is no evidence that his military service was interrupted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010196
The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), DA Form 2446 (Request for Orders), discharge orders, National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), and 10 pages of post-service medical records. The available evidence does not include treatment records related to the 13 May 1983 accident. The available record does not contain any evidence and the applicant has not provided any evidence of medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021692
He was honorably released from active duty on 4 February 2012 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. He does not state what specific physical or behavioral health condition made him medically unfit for military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056614C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS : In effect, that the Board correct his records to reflect that he was separated from the service by reason of physical disability. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057266C070420
APPLICANT STATES : That his records show that he did have a disability and that he should have been medically discharged. A medical report prepared at the Army hospital at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, shows that the applicant was admitted to the hospital on 14 January 1988 after being examined for possible medical board evaluation because of complaints of neck and back pain since 14 June 1987 [the date of the automobile accident]. On 6 July 1993 the applicant was discharged from the Army Reserve.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509999C070209
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm on 1 February 1991 and was separated on 23 March of that same year. A 27 February 1995 VA medical report indicates that the applicant has spinal stenosis with degenerative lower lumbar spine. Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, as amended, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009961
The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. He does not state what specific physical or behavioral health condition made him medically unfit for military service; however, he appears to believe that since the VA awarded him service-connected disability compensation for various conditions, possibly PTSD, the Army should have done the same. The applicant did not provide evidence that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506920C070209
On 3 October 1978 the applicants commanding officer recommended that the applicant be eliminated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, because of his continued abuse of drugs and lack of desire for successful rehabilitation. On 4 October 1978 the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed that the applicant receive an Honorable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 3-2b(1), provides that disability compensation is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001188
After all, he did not know he had PTSD. A designation of "unfit for duty" is required before an individual can be separated from the military because of an injury or medical condition. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rating at less than 30 percent.