Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010196
Original file (20120010196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010196 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests he be shown to have been separated due to a physical disability.

2.  The applicant states he had over 10 years of service; therefore, he believes he should have been given a medical board.  He sustained an injury in 1983 that resulted in him being unable to work and led to his discharge. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), DA Form 2446 (Request for Orders), discharge orders, National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), and 10 pages of post-service medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (ARNG) on 26 August 1976 with 1 year, 11 months, and 28 days of prior active service and 9 months and 11 days of prior inactive service.

3.  A DA Form 2173, dated 13 May 1983, shows the applicant injured his right lower leg and back in a fall during a rappelling exercise during his 1983 2-week period of annual training.

4.  The available evidence does not include treatment records related to the 
13 May 1983 accident. 

5.  The applicant's record contains several notices of unexcused absences which appear to have resulted in his separation action for unsatisfactory performance due to nonparticipation in drills. 

6.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve) on 
13 March 1985.  The reason for separation is listed as unsatisfactory performance.  His NGB Form 22 shows 11 years, 2 months, and 26 days total service for pay.

7.  The applicant's 2011 post-service medical record shows he was evaluated for low back and leg problems.  The report does not include a history of the onset of the medical conditions.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years of service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent.

9.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, they must be unable to perform the duties of their office, grade, rank or rating.

10.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 2-2b provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, their continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that they were unable to perform their duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior 

to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.  Paragraph 3-2a(5)b(1), provides that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While on ARNG annual training, the applicant was injured in a training accident on 13 May 1983.  He continued to serve in his ARNG unit until 13 March 1985 when he was discharged for unsatisfactory performance.

2.  The available record does not contain any evidence and the applicant has not provided any evidence of medical treatment for his 1983 injury.  The post-service medical records the applicant provided do not provide a direct correlation between the 1983 injury and the reason for his discharge action.

3.  While the applicant clearly sustained an injury when he was in an active duty status there is no evidence that this injury resulted in any impairment in his ability to perform his duties or that the injury was a result of his discharge.  

4.  The applicant's record does not show his service was interrupted as a result of a physical disability warranting a medical evaluation or disability processing.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION
	
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010196



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010196



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003161

    Original file (20090003161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation also states that, when a Soldier is being processed for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement creates a presumption that the Soldier is fit. With respect to the applicant’s retirement, the evidence of record shows that the applicant completed 18 years and 4 months of service for pay at the time he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026348

    Original file (20100026348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * NGB Form 22 * NGB Form 22a (Correction to NGB Form 22) * Three DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Two DA Forms 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Two PRARNG memoranda * Department of the Army memorandum * Eight orders * Award certificate * Letter of recommendation * DA Form 2166-5A (Senior Enlisted Evaluation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009833

    Original file (20120009833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his reason for discharge be changed to physical disability. Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence that he was unable to perform his duties because of injuries sustained while on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011945

    Original file (20100011945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to count the period of time between 1 May 2007 and 26 January 2009 as active service and that he be so compensated. The form shows: * he requested ordinary leave for Thursday 8 March 2007 and Friday 9 March 2007 * He indicated his leave address as XXXX Morningside Drive, NW, Washington, DC * he departed on ordinary leave at 0001 hours, on 8 March 2007 * he was granted a 2-day extension on Saturday, 10 March 2007 * he returned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022885

    Original file (20100022885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The evidence of record shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017372

    Original file (20140017372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's records that indicates he was found unfit to perform his military duties due to an unfitting medical condition prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he/she must be unable to perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank or rating. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011432

    Original file (20090011432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides, in support of his request for reconsideration, copies of the Board's Record of Proceedings, dated 3 March 2009; Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating decision, dated 26 November 1984; FB Form 90 (Record Fire Scorecard); DA Form 705 (Army Physical Readiness Test Scorecard); two DA Forms 4856 (General Counseling Form), dated 9 September and 6 October 1983; FB Form 6 (Trainee Discharge General Data Sheet), dated 19 October 1983; FB Form Letter 1 (Proposed Separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018119

    Original file (20110018119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically separated instead of honorably discharged. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. There is no evidence of record and he has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003755

    Original file (20130003755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: Applicant requests that he be given an opportunity to have an MEB and a PEB review his Line of Duty (LOD)/medical documentation in order for him to receive a proper medical disposition upon his discharge from the PRARNG. c. Paragraph 3-2b (processing for separation or retirement from active duty) states disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070226C070402

    Original file (2002070226C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS : Reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by showing his injuries received in the line of duty (LOD) on 6 April 1998 were evaluated by the Army, and that he was awarded a 40 percent disability rating and disability retirement on 23 April 1998. The applicant's contentions that he was erroneously not evaluated for his 1998...