| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that prior to enlisting in the Army he applied to technical college and had not heard back from them; in addition, he was newly wed. He claims that subsequent to entering the Army he was notified of his acceptance to the technical college and was considered absent without leave (AWOL) when he elected to attend school. He further states that he now understands that his decision to go AWOL to attend the technical college and not returning to military control was the wrong choice. In support of his application, he submits a certificate of training from the United Tribes Employment Training Center and his separation document (DD Form 214).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 30 September 1974, he entered the Army for a period of 3 years. He completed basic combat training and was assigned to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, to attend advanced individual training (AIT). His record shows that the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was private/E-2 and it documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition.
On 5 January 1975, while assigned to Fort Leonard Wood the applicant went AWOL. He remained away for 65 days until returning to military control on 10 March 1975. On 20 March 1975, a court-martial charge was preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 5 January 1975 to 10 March 1975.
On 25 March 1975, the applicant consulted legal counsel and after being advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum allowable punishment, and the possible effects of an UD, he voluntarily requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10,
Army Regulation 635-200.
On 4 April 1975, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s discharge request and directed he be issued an UD and that he be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. On 16 April 1975, the applicant was discharged accordingly after completing a total of 4 months and 11 days of creditable active military service and accruing 65 days of time lost to due AWOL.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statue of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an UD.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded given he now knows he made the wrong choice by going AWOL to attend school. However, it finds this factor alone is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge and after consulting with legal counsel, he voluntarily requested separation in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he admitted guilt to the stipulated offense under the UCMJ.
3. The Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process and that his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
4. Finally, the Board notes that the applicant chose to request an administrative discharge rather than risk the consequences of a court-martial. Although he may now feel that he made the wrong choice, this is not a sufficient basis for granting the requested relief.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__INW___ __HOF__ __DPH__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062419 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/15 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19750416 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, CH 10 . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | In lieu of Trial by CM |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 93.07. | 71.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088571C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089597C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065190C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062623C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. On 11 June 1975, court-martial charges were preferred against him for escaping from correctional custody on 8 June 1975.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003959C070205
Stone | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has failed to provide evidence showing that he was improperly advised, or denied the training he enlisted for. The applicant’s separation document confirms he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091341C070212
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The application submitted in this case is dated 20 May 2003. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707477
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges are preferred, submit a request for discharge for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071500C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or general discharge by reason of medical disability. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061637C070421
He stated that he had requested a hardship discharge; however, the request never left the company area. On 21 June 1971, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 with a UD. However, at the time of the applicant's separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of a UD.The applicant appealed to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his UD to a general, under honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000977
On 16 May 1975, the applicant requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 (Discharge for the Good of the Service). The documents show the applicant stated, "I went AWOL because of marital problems I had after I joined the service. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was 19 years of age when he submitted his request for discharge for the good of the service.