Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062417C070421
Original file (2001062417C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001062417

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to reflect his correct Social Security Account Number (SSAN).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the SSAN reflected in his military records is incorrect. He contends that after he entered the Army in 1979, the Social Security office informed him that the SSAN shown in his military records was never issued to anyone and he was given another SSAN. In support of his application, he submits an undated letter of explanation; a letter from the Social Security Administration, dated 14 November 2000; an information paper titled “Verification of Your Social Security Number”; and a copy of a Social Security card and Missouri Driver License.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant entered active duty on 4 May 1979 and served as a cannon crewman. He was honorably released on 1 May 1982 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 due to short length of time remaining on active duty which precluded reassignment.

The applicant’s DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 2 May 1979; his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) prepared on 7 May 1979; and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), authenticated in his own hand on
1 May 1982; display the same SSAN.

The applicant provided a copy of a Social Security card which displays a different SSAN from that contained in his military records.

Army Regulation 635-5 establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. In pertinent part, it directs the SSAN will be entered in item number 3 of the DD Form 214. The regulation also directs the SSAN will be verified for accuracy from the soldier’s DA Form 2 and 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Records), which is formerly known as the DA Form 20.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s contentions pertaining to his correct SSAN and the Social Security card provided in support of his claim. However, evidence of record shows the SSAN reflected in the applicant’s military records is the same SSAN used at the time of his enlistment in 1979 and discharge from the Army in 1982.

2. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that the Social Security Administration told him the SSAN used during his Army service was never issued to anyone. However, the applicant has provided no evidence to support this assertion. In view of the foregoing, there is no evidence that the SSAN used by the applicant during his Army service was incorrect. Therefore, there is no basis for changing the applicant’s SSAN in his military records.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

RJW____ KAN_____ REB____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001062417
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011025
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0900
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085995C070212

    Original file (2003085995C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant’s active duty service was performed under the SSAN he now claims was in error. Therefore, the Board concludes that the SSAN contained in the applicant’s military records and in his 1 October 1982 separation document should not be changed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087417C070212

    Original file (2003087417C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that all his records, to include his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, and his NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service, be corrected to show his correct social security account number. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he reported, to military personnel officials, while he served in the Texas Army National Guard or on active duty for training, that the social...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074879C070403

    Original file (2002074879C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Therefore, the Board concludes that the SSAN contained in the applicant’s military records and in his 24 April 1979 separation document should not be changed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011441

    Original file (20080011441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    All documents on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contain a SSAN list the one he now claims is incorrect, and there is no indication in his record that he ever attempted to change his SSAN or to resolve an SSAN discrepancy while he was serving on active duty. All documents on file in his OMPF also list the SSAN listed on his enlistment documents, qualification record and DD Form 214, which confirms he performed all of his military service under the SSAN...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083377C070212

    Original file (2003083377C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: This is also the SSAN that was recorded in his Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20), and other service records created during his tenure on active duty. The DD Form 214 issued to him on the date he was separated lists the SSAN he now claims is incorrect in Item 3 (Social Security Number); and Item 5 (Grade, Rate of Rank) contains the entry PFC, which confirms he held this rank on that date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062123C070421

    Original file (2001062123C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military records be corrected to show his Social Security Account Number (SSAN) instead of a service number. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Records show the SSAN on his military records is the same SSAN specified in his induction orders, dated 24 July 1969, and shown on his DD Form 214 at the time of his discharge from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068774C070402

    Original file (2002068774C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his rank, pay grade, and social security account number (SSAN) listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In this case, the applicant has provided no evidence to suggest that the SSAN listed in his records was in error while he was performing his military service, or that maintaining this SSAN in his records would cause him any injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015110

    Original file (20110015110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty lists the SSN the applicant claims is incorrect in item 2 (SSN). The orders and documents in the applicant's military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) that contain an SSN list the same SSN that is entered on the DD Form 4 and DA Form 2-1. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time contains the SSN listed throughout his military record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002872

    Original file (20150002872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he was discharged in 1976 for the purpose of reenlistment, he was issued a DD Form 214 that listed the SSN he disclosed. That is why his October 1990 DD Form 214 reflects his new SSN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 27 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214, ending on 27 June 1976, the entry "Also used SSN 550-xx-xxxx."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103026C070208

    Original file (2004103026C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He states that he did not present his SSAN card at the time of his entry into the service and only provided what he believed was his SSAN at the time. However, in order to provide a solution that provides the applicant the relief necessary to obtain veterans benefits and that still maintains the accuracy of the military records in question, the SSAN correction will be limited to the...