| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Allen L. Raub | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas E. O’Shaughnessy, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.
APPLICANT STATES: That she is not receiving the SBP although the terms of the divorce granted it to her. She provides a copy of the death certificate and the divorce decree as supporting evidence.
COUNSEL CONTENDS: That the applicant was awarded the SBP as a former spouse in the Decree of Dissolution of Marriage and their property settlement as agreed to in this Dissolution of Marriage dated 1 December 1986.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM’s military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
The FSM retired from the active Army on 1 January 1973. On 1 June 1973, he enrolled in the SBP for spouse and child coverage.
The FSM’s and applicant’s marriage certificate is not available. On 1 December 1986, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The provided divorce decree states in part “…Respondent is to continue to pay to the Petitioner the sum of Three Hundred Dollars…per month pending the effective date of the receipt by the Petitioner of her share of the military pension of the Respondent.” The decree does not mention the SBP. The applicant did receive a portion of the FSM’s retired pay. The evidence of record shows that the FSM stopped paying SBP premiums effective 1 January 1987.
The FSM died on 19 June 2000.
Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to enactment of the law.
Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. This law also decreed that state courts could treat military retired pay as community property in divorce cases if they so chose. It established procedures by which a former spouse could receive all or a portion of that court settlement as a direct payment from the service finance center.
Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
Public Law 98-525, enacted 19 October 1984, provided that a former spouse could request a deemed election within one year of the court order requiring SBP to be established on the former spouse’s behalf provided the member agreed to provide coverage.
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. There is no evidence of Government error in this case. The divorce decree did not award the applicant the SBP. She was only awarded a portion of the FSM’s retired pay. There is no evidence to show the FSM was ordered by the court to provide or that he intended to provide the applicant with former spouse SBP coverage.
2. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__slp___ __alr___ __teo___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001062395 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011023 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004698
The applicant requests the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage and that she be granted the benefits described in their divorce decree (Tri-Care for Life, Military Identification Card, and Post Exchange and Commissary Privileges). The divorce decree provided by the applicant with her application did not award the applicant SBP entitlements. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018395
She also provides a letter from the FSM, dated 1 October 2008, in which he confirms that it was and is his intent that his former spouse (the applicant) continue to be the beneficiary of his SBP, and a letter from her counsel, dated 6 October 200, in which he indicates that a copy of the applicants Final Judgment was sent to DFAS in order that she receive her portion of the FSMs military retirement benefits and to ensure that she would be listed as beneficiary of the SBP benefits. Public...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005777C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005777 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018666
There is no evidence of record to show that the FSM ever submitted a former spouse SBP election, or that the applicant ever made a deemed election request within one year of their divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The law also permits the former spouse concerned to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000508C070205
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. However, since the divorce decree provided for SBP former spouse coverage, the applicant was married to the FSM for the majority of his military career, and the applicant was unmarried at the time of his death (i.e., no possible spouse beneficiary), it would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000628
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his category of participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage. Counsel provides the applicant's DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records) signature page, the FSM's Certificate of Death, and the Final Judgment Granting Dissolution of Marriage between the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011503
The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show she is the eligible beneficiary to receive a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity as a former spouse. Although the applicant's DOB is shown in the SBP section of the FSM's Retiree Account Statement, there is no evidence of record that shows the FSM changed his SBP category from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage. There is also no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003783
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 September 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003783 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 8 August 2008, the applicant submitted a letter to DFAS Military Retired Pay Office explaining that she was finally receiving retired pay and was making a deemed election to keep the SBP for the start date of her divorce. As part of the divorce settlement agreement, the FSM was required to elect SBP coverage for his former spouse; however, the FSM did not notify DFAS...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015534
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022968
The applicant requests the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members. However, there was no such court order to maintain the applicant as the FSM's beneficiary as his "former spouse" on his SBP.