| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | |
| Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be promoted to the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5); that he be awarded a Cold War Medal; and that he be provided any other awards to which he is entitled for his service during the Vietnam era.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that during his service in the Army during the cold war and Vietnam era, he was nominated for soldier of the month for his performance of duty while assigned to Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii. However, the soldier of the month award was given to a medical corpsman assigned to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). In addition, he indicates that he was recommended for promotion, but he was told the promotions had to go to those soldiers who were serving in the RVN and he claims this was wrong. In support of his application, he provides a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214).
4. The applicant’s military record shows that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 May 1970 and that he continuously served on active duty for 1 year, 7 months, and 17 days, until being honorably separated on
22 December 1971.
5. The DD Form 214, issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, confirms that on the date of his release from active duty (REFRAD) he held the rank and pay grade of specialist/E-4 (SPC/E-4) and that he was serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist). This document also confirms that during his active duty tenure the only award he received was the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM).
6. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that the highest grade he attained while serving on active duty was SPC/E-4 and that the only award he received was the NDSM.
7. In addition, the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no documents or orders that suggest he was ever selected for promotion to SGT/E-5 or that he was ever placed on a valid promotion standing list to that rank while serving on active duty.
8. The applicant’s record is also void of any derogatory information that would preclude him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal and there is no evidence that he was disqualified from receiving this award by any of the unit commanders for which he served during his active duty tenure.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth Department of the Army criteria, policy and instructions concerning individual military awards. This regulation contains no reference to a Cold War Medal and it is not listed in the authorized Army individual or service medals contained in this regulation. However, section 1084 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 1998, approved the issuance of a Cold War Certificate to all members of the armed forces who faithfully and honorably served the United States anytime during the period 2 September 1945 to 26 December 1991. The Cold War Certificate must be requested from the Total Army Personnel Command.
10. Chapter 4 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides guidance on awarding the AGCM. It states, in pertinent part, that this award is authorized for individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. For the first award only, a period of 1 or more years is a qualifying period for the AGCM at the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, a specific disqualification from a unit commander is required to deny the award.
11. Paragraph 2-13 provides guidance on awarding the VSM and it states, in pertinent part, that the award is authorized to members who served in units assigned or attached to the RVN or to units in direct support of military operations in the RVN during the period 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he should be promoted to SGT/E-5 based on his duty performance and honorable period of service; however, it finds an insufficient evidentiary basis to support this claim.
2. The evidence of record gives no indication that the applicant was ever selected for and placed on a valid promotion list for SGT/E-5 or that he was actually promoted to that rank and pay grade. It further confirms that the highest rank he held while serving on active duty was SPC/E-4 and that this was the rank and pay grade he held on the date of his REFRAD. Thus, the Board concludes this requested relief is not warranted.
3. The evidence of record does not indicate that he ever served in the RVN or any other area that would have qualified him to receive the Vietnam Service Medal. In addition, there is no evidence to show that he is entitled to any service awards other than the NDSM he received and which was properly entered in his record.
4. However, a review of the applicant’s record does show he served a qualifying period of service that entitled him to award of the AGCM. Lacking evidence of any derogatory information in the record that would have disqualified him from receiving this award and the absence of a formal disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served, the Board concludes it would be in the interest of justice to award him the AGCM for his honorable service from 6 May 1970 through 22 December 1971. Further, the Board finds it would be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.
5. The Board notes the applicant’s request for a Cold War Medal, but this is not an authorized Army medal. However, based on his service, it appears the applicant is eligible to request a Cold War Recognition Certificate under the provisions of section 1084 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 1998. In order to receive this certificate, the applicant must submit a request to the following address: Commander, PERSCOM, Cold War Recognition,
Hoffman II, ATTN: TAPC-CWRS, 3N45, 200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, VA 22332-0473.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 May 1970 through 22 December 1971 and by providing him a corrected separation document that includes this award.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__JLP __ _ _CJP __ __KWL GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Jennifer L. Prater__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001062381 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/17 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (Partial Relief) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010699
The applicant states he is entitled to the following awards which are not included on his DD Form 214 or DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) for the service indicated: a. the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal (RVNCAHM) First Class Unit Citation, and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), which are unit awards earned during his service in Vietnam with the 5th Special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013803
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Section 38 (Record of Assignments) that he received an academic Good efficiency rating while attending his initial entry training during the period 18 September 1970 to 10 June 1971. As a result, the applicants claim for the award of the AGCM is corroborated by the evidence of record and it would be appropriate to grant him this award for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 June 1970 through 19 June 1973...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020898
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record contains no orders or other documents that show the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the ARCOM by proper authority while he served on active duty and he fails to provide any evidence to show his entitlements to this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022248
Given this administrative remedy is available, the portion of the applicant's request pertaining to the Cold War Recognition Certificate will not be further discussed. It is awarded each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; or for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012970
He claims he was promoted to SGT and received awards which were never documented in his record or on his DD Form 214. The record is void of any orders showing he was ever promoted to SGT by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 19 February 1968 through 18...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075326C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not reflect award of the Vietnam Service Commemorative Medal, the 50 th Anniversary Korean Defense Commemorative Medal, the Cold War Victory Medal, the US Army Service Commemorative Medal, the Army Overseas Ribbon, the Overseas...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065561C070421
In addition, the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no indication that he was ever recommended for, selected for, or promoted to a rank and pay grade above PFC/E-3 during his active duty tenure. The DD Form 214 issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, confirms that at the time of his separation he held the pay grade and rank of PFC/E-3 and that he was trained and served in MOS 94B (Cook). That all of the Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000743
The applicant provides his application for the Cold War Recognition Certificate and two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant served during a period qualifying service for award of the NDSM. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019892
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the following: * TET Counteroffensive [correctly displayed as a bronze service star on the Vietnam Service Medal] * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Vietnam Defense Expeditionary Service [correctly known as the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal] * Combat Service * Cold War Victory [correctly known as the Cold War Recognition Certificate] * American Defense Service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006078
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect the: * Cold War Commemorative Medal * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) 2. There is no evidence in his record of a commander's disqualification that would have disqualified the applicant from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that...