| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5) and that he earned the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should show his rank and pay grade as SGT/E-5 because he was promoted twice. Further, he claims that although he received schooling as a cook, the Army realized that his skills lay elsewhere and after he was sent to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he was used in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman). In support of his application, he submits the following documents: Purple Heart Certificate; DD Form 214; and Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20).
4. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms that
the highest rank and pay grade he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3 (PFC/E-3). It also shows that he served in the RVN from 12 June 1968 to 1 June 1969 and that he was assigned to C Company,
1st Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division.
5. In addition, the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no indication that he was ever recommended for, selected for, or promoted to a rank and pay grade above PFC/E-3 during his active duty tenure. Further, the MPRJ contains no documents that contain derogatory information or that make any suggestion that he was ever disqualified from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) by any of the unit commanders for which he served.
6. On 14 August 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) at the expiration of his term of service (ETS). At the time of his separation, he had completed a total of 2 years and 2 months of active military service.
7. The DD Form 214 issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, confirms that at the time of his separation he held the pay grade and rank of PFC/E-3 and that he was trained and served in MOS 94B (Cook). This document also shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards and decorations: National Defense Service Medal; Purple Heart; Vietnam Service Medal; and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with
60 Device.
8. On 19 September 1997, a Correction to DD Form 214 (DD Form 215) was published by the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), which corrected the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 14 August 1969, to add the entry “11B10 Rifleman” to Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) and the entry “Combat Infantryman Badge” to Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized).
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The regulation stipulates that the normal qualifying period for this award is 3 years; however, in the case of the first award, a period of 1 or more years is considered a qualifying period at the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified and current practice requires that unit commanders provide written notice of non-favorable consideration and allow individuals the opportunity to respond/rebut the reason for denial of the award.
10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in the RVN. This publication confirms that during his assignment tenure, the applicant’s unit earned the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the rank and pay grade listed in his DD Form 214 is incorrect, but it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim. However, the Board finds the applicant’s claim of entitlement to the CIB has already been confirmed by an appropriate Army agency and that a correction to his separation document has already been issued to add this award. Therefore, no further relief in regard to this issue is required.
2. The evidence of record confirms the highest rank and pay grade attained by the applicant during his active duty tenure was PFC/E-3, and there are no documents on file in his MPRJ that give any indication that he was ever recommended for or promoted to a higher rank and pay grade. Therefore, lacking independent evidence to the contrary, the Boards finds insufficient evidence to support changing the rank and pay grade entry in the applicant’s separation document.
3. The Board does conclude, lacking any derogatory information on file in the applicant’s record or a specific disqualifying action from any of his unit commanders, that he served a qualifying period of honorable service that entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. In addition, the Board finds that his unit service in the RVN entitles him to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Therefore, the Board finds that it would be appropriate to add these awards to his records at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for his honorable service from 15 June 1967 to 14 August 1969; by showing he earned the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and by providing him a corrected separation document that includes these awards.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__SLP__ __SK __ __EJA___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__Shirley L. Powell__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065561 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/03/19 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (Partial Relief) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084742C070212
Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents which are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. Thus, the Board finds it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH and to add this award to his record at this time. Further, lacking any derogatory information on file or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders that would preclude him from receiving the award,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064542C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his rank as E-5; and that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The applicant states, in effect, that the BSM and PUC were awarded to all members of his unit at the end of 1969, and that he was an E-5 at the time the BSM was awarded to all members of his unit who held the rank of E-5 or above. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004157C070208
Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002171C070208
Antonio Uribe | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and Army Good Conduct Medal; by adding the Air Medal he earned to his record; by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060407C070421
Paragraph 3-13 outlines the criteria for the award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and it states, in pertinent part, that the award is authorized in time of war for heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service. In addition, given that the record is void of any derogatory information or a specific unit commander’s disqualifying recommendation for award of the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant is entitled to the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063251C070421
The Board notes the applicant’s request that his military records be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank of SP4/E-4, effective 8 January 1968. However, although he provided a copy of unit orders that seem to indicate he was promoted to SP4/E-4, effective 8 January 1968, the Board finds insufficient corroborating evidence to support this claim. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003233
The applicant requests his record be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Palm Unit Citation. The MPRJ is void of any documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the ARCOM by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018370
The applicant requests, in effect, that all awards he earned during his active duty service, to include service medals authorized for Republic of Vietnam (RVN) service, be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Combat Infantryman Badge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067839C070402
By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to award him the PH at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for being wounded in action, while serving as a SGT/E-5 in the RVN, on 18 February 1970;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080261C070215
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. During its...