Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
Ms. June Hajjar | Chairperson | |
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Member | |
Mr. Roger W. Able | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to either a general or honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was recently diagnosed as "having bi-polar and dissociative disorder." He states that according to officials at the Jackson Veterans Center he "should have never been allowed to join the Army in 1981." Although he indicates in his application that he submitted a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty), a court transcript and copies of arrest records, in support of his request, none of those documents were received by the Board. Copies of medical treatment records from several civilian health care facilities, which treated the applicant in 1977, were included with his application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
In the fall of his senior year of high school the applicant enlisted in the USAR (United States Army Reserve) under the DEP (Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program). Upon graduation from high school he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 2 years. On his Report of Medical History, part of his enlistment physical, he indicated his health was good and that he had not suffered from any medical ailments, including epilepsy, fits, frequent trouble sleeping, depression or excessive worry, loss of memory or amnesia, nervous trouble of any sort, or periods of unconsciousness. He did note that he was hospitalized at age 12 for observation after falling out of a tree. The evaluating physician found him medically qualified for enlistment.
The applicant successfully completed basic and advanced individual training as an automatic data telecommunications center operator. In December 1983 he was discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. His commander noted, as part of his reenlistment package, that the applicant was "an outstanding soldier" who "consistently seeks help to develop his knowledge and skill…." By February 1984 he had been promoted to pay grade E-4.
In May 1984 the applicant underwent a periodic physical examination. He did indicate on the 1984 Report of Medical History that he had suffered from frequent trouble sleeping, depression or excessive worry, and nervous trouble. He also noted that he had been hospitalized for emotional problems at age 15. The evaluating physician found him medically qualified for continued service and noted "no significant medical problems."
In March 1985 he successfully completed the Primary Leadership Development Course and in May 1985 he was awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal.
On 27 March 1986, while assigned to Arlington Hall Station in Arlington, Virginia, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial, in consonance with his plea, of two counts of wrongful distribution of marijuana and of being AWOL (absent without leave) between 2 and 7 January 1986. His sentence included a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 18 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to pay grade E-1. The sentence was approved and on 31 December 1987 the discharge was executed.
Prior to his discharge the applicant did undergo a physical and mental status evaluation. The mental status evaluation noted the applicant was fully alert, that his thought process was clear and normal, and that he was mentally responsible. Although the applicant did note on his Report of Medical History that he had suffered from epilepsy or fits, depression or excessive worry, and had been treated for mental/emotional problems in his youth, the evaluating physician found him medically qualified for separation.
The civilian medical treatment records, provided by the applicant in support of his application, indicate that he was hospitalized on three occasions between May and June 1977 for what was described as "hysterical neurosis" and "conversional hysteria" following what was described as fainting or seizure spells. Evaluating physicians at the time essentially attributed his condition to his school and peer situation. Laboratory, X-ray, and EEGs were all normal. There is no evidence of similar episodes following his 1977 hospitalization and his available service medical records indicate no such problems during his years of military service.
In a 1998 letter to officials in St. Louis, in which the applicant requested a copy of his DD Form 214, he indicated that he was "charged, tried, and convicted of distributing drugs." He noted that he "knew what [he did],” and just did not "know the seriousness of what [he] was doing until it was too late."
Army Regulation 635-200 states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
The Table of Maximum Punishment indicates that the maximum punishment for his offenses was a Dishonorable Discharge, 10 years and 6 months confinement, and total forfeiture, assuming the distributions of marijuana were each less than 30 grams.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Although the applicant may have been hospitalized for emotional problems as a teenager, there is no indication that those problems prevented him from completing his enlistment contract or contributed to the behavior that resulted in his court-martial conviction. The Board notes that in spite of the emotional problems he experienced while an adolescent, he successfully completed training, was promoted to pay grade E-4, recognized by his commander as an outstanding soldier, and awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that his conduct, which resulted in his court-martial conviction, was somehow justified because of his earlier emotional problems.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JH____ __KAK__ __RWA__ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2001061990 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 20020205 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008938
His discharge resulted in a general under honorable conditions characterization of service, which is inappropriate for the following reasons: * He suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during and after his three combat tours in Vietnam * He was being treated and assessed for mental and emotional problems in the years prior to his final discharge from service * His mental and emotional problems, which stemmed from his PTSD, made further service in the Army impossible * At the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008134C070208
He surrendered to military authorities on 25 February 1977, nearly 8 years later. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The psychological evaluation, submitted by the applicant in support of his request, was conducted October 2004 and notes that the applicant “received a less than honorable discharge from the Army on 03/23/97” and that he was “seeking to have his discharge upgraded to at least a general discharge.” The physician...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020668
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she had the condition of major depressive disorder at the time of her discharge in 2003. e. The applicant has provided insufficient evidence that the condition of depressive disorder was unfitting at the time of her separation from the military in 2003.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004899
An SF 600, dated 2 September 1972, shows the applicant complained of nervousness and was prescribed Librium. There is no evidence to show he was unable to perform his assigned duties. However, the evidence of record shows that his chain of command considered his previous service and he received a general discharge under honorable conditions rather than a discharge under other than honorable conditions which was normally considered appropriate in a chapter 10 Separations when a Soldier was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01808
The applicant in March 1982 presented for care in the mental health clinic with nervousness and depressive symptoms due to “too much stress on flight line (his crew chief).” His medical records also reflect the applicant was evaluated for alcohol abuse in March 1983, with no other details listed. The evidence in the record shows a diagnosis of a personality disorder, however, the record also shows that the applicant’s duty performance was excellent. There is no indication in the record...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01213
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016322
Counsel states that the applicant forwarded a request to the DVA to have his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) corrected based on service-connected disability for PTSD due to his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Counsel then examines the applicants military medical records and argues that the results of these examinations would require the applicant to be considered by a medical board which, counsel contends, would have led to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013872
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was medically retired with a disability rating of at least 50 percent. Counsel states the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army on 2 July 2007 and served honorably until he was administratively discharged for "other designated physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability" in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17. It is a fact-finding board...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2001-091
The applicant stated that a Naval psychiatrist, who evaluated him in 199X at the request of the Coast Guard, supports his allegation that his Bipolar disease was incurred on and aggravated by his Coast Guard active duty service. He stated that the applicant needed to be "medically boarded from the Coast Guard" and recommended a medical board, which should have occurred while the applicant was on active duty. In recent statements on behalf of the applicant, CDR H (the flight surgeon), as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019462
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019462 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This form also shows his character of service as "Under Conditions Other Than Honorable." Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.