Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061765C070421
Original file (2001061765C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 16 October 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061765


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Hubert S. Shaw, Jr. Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests award of the Army Achievement Medal and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

3. The applicant states that he was “nominated” for a Meritorious Service Medal which was downgraded to an award of the Army Achievement Medal. He states that he never received the award of the Army Achievement Medal or an award of the Overseas Service Ribbon to which he believes he is entitled. The applicant states that he had been trying to get this matter resolved for several years.

4. In support of his application, the applicant submitted a 31 October 1994 letter from the Awards Branch of the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command to the applicant, a 15 November 1999 letter from the applicant to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, a 23 March 2000 letter from the Army Review Boards Agency to the applicant, a copy of a 12 September 1994 Veterans Administration Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), and a copy of a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) with a draft citation.

5. The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on 4 October 1989 and completed training as an Electronic Warfare Signal Intelligence Analyst. He served in Germany from 15 March 1991 to 29 June 1993 and was honorably separated from active duty on 1 July 1993.

6. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not show the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Achievement Medal or the Overseas Service Ribbon as authorized awards.

7. The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 638 which recommends him for award of the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period March 1991 to July 1993. This form shows that, on 12 June 1993, the applicant’s company commander recommended the proposed award of the Army Commendation Medal be downgraded to the Army Achievement Medal. On 29 June 1993, the applicant’s battalion commander, who was also the approval authority for award of the Army Achievement Medal, determined that the appropriate award in recognition of the applicant’s service was the Army Achievement Medal and that the applicant should receive that award instead of the Army Commendation Medal. The DA Form 638 shows that 103d Military Intelligence Battalion Orders 16-01, dated 6 July 1993, were promulgated to award the Army Achievement Medal to the applicant.

8. Item 5 (Oversea Service) of the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record-Part II) shows that he served in Germany for 27 months and contains the entry “YES” under the heading Normal Tour Completion.

9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the armed forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.

11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that the Overseas Service Ribbon was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981. The regulation states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award for successful completion of overseas tours. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981 and the overseas service is not recognized with another U.S. service medal.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal, not the Meritorious Service Medal as claimed.

2. Evidence of record further shows that the lieutenant colonel in command of the 103d Military Intelligence Battalion, who was also the approval authority for the Army Achievement Medal, determined that the appropriate award to recognize the applicant’s service was the Army Achievement Medal and he approved award of that decoration to the applicant. Award of the Army Achievement Medal to the applicant was authorized by 103d Military Intelligence Battalion Orders 16-01, dated 6 July 1993.

3. Based on the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to award of the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service during the period March 1991 to July 1993 and correction of his records to show this decoration.

4. Evidence of record also shows that the applicant completed a normal tour of overseas service in Germany from 15 March 1991 to 29 June 1993 which qualified him for award of the Overseas Service Ribbon. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Overseas Service Ribbon.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service during the period March 1991 to July 1993 and was awarded the Overseas Service Ribbon.

BOARD VOTE:

__RKS__ ___PH___ __RVO__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001061765
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011016
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY MR SCHNEIDER
ISSUES 1. 107.0000.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011706

    Original file (20110011706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 July 1993 to show: * he participated in the Liberation and Defense of Kuwait campaigns * in item 11 (Primary Specialty) 11B2OC2 Infantry Anti-armor Specialist * in item 12f (Foreign Service) 4 years, 8 months, 12 days * in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of service)) the: * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088732C070403

    Original file (2003088732C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter of explanation; a DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 February 2003; a DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 December 1999; three DA Forms 638-1 (Recommendation for Award of Army Achievement Medal, Army Commendation Medal, and Meritorious Service Medal); five DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award); DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record); DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record, Part I); DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003427

    Original file (20140003427.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * Kuwait Liberation Medal - Kuwait * Overseas Service Ribbon * Army Achievement Medal * Army Commendation Medal 2. The applicant states: * his peers of the 72nd Engineer Company, 197th Infantry Brigade, were awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait); he was not * the criteria for award of the Overseas Service Ribbon was changed in 1996; it can be issued for time served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014670

    Original file (20060014670.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his separation document to show award of the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award), the Army Achievement Medal with four Oak Leaf Clusters, the Armed Forces Reserve Medal (2nd Award), and the Overseas Service Ribbon (3rd Award). The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) covering the period 12 April 1984 through 24 February 1987; a DD Form 214 covering the period 11 October 1990 through 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091365C070212

    Original file (2003091365C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Therefore, a DD Form 215 should be prepared, correcting Item 13 of the applicant’s last DD Form 214, dated 16 June 1994, showing that the applicant is entitled to the following awards and decorations: the Army Commendation Medal; the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze service stars; the National Defense Service Medal; the Army Service Ribbon; the Overseas Service Ribbon; the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072815C070403

    Original file (2002072815C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal and the Overseas Service Ribbon as authorized awards on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant states that the approved orders show his entitlement to the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Achievement Medal and that his orders to Korea verify his foreign service. It recommended that the applicant be awarded the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021686

    Original file (20120021686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Army Good Conduct Medal * Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal * Meritorious Service Medal 2. Although his conduct and efficiency ratings can't be determined from the available evidence, given his honorable service, foreign service tour completion, attainment of the rank/grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064131C070421

    Original file (2001064131C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of three Army Achievement Medals, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the Overseas Service Ribbon. The applicant states that certain awards were withheld from his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). In support of his application, he provided a certificate for award of the Army Achievement Medal; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 23 February 2000; a DA Form 638, dated 5 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084708C070212

    Original file (2003084708C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Based on the foregoing, the Chief of the Military Awards Branch recommended that the applicant's request should be denied, that he should receive the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) approved by the Commanding General of the 5th Signal Command on 9 May 2002, and that the applicant's servicing personnel center should correct his official records to show this award. COL R, as the Chief of Staff and Headquarters Commandant of the 5th Signal Command at that time, indicated in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024066

    Original file (20110024066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Two awards of the National Defense Service Medal for his service in Haiti * Two awards of the Overseas Service Ribbon for his service in Haiti * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Shoulder sleeve insignia * All other awards and/or medals that he is entitled to * His rank/grade as corporal (CPL)/E-4 vice specialist (SPC)/E-4 * His foreign service time in Haiti 2. Therefore, it...