Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061562C070421
Original file (2001061562C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 24 January 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001061562

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Lee Cates Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. George D. Paxson Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show entitlement to award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and that his place of entry into the Army be changed.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was awarded the ARCOM but it was erroneously left off his records. He indicates he entered the Army from Fairmont, West Virginia.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's available military records show:

During the period 2 February through 27 June 1973, the applicant served in the Army Reserve Delayed Enlistment Program.

On 28 June 1973, after being processed at the Armed Forces Entrance and Examining Station (AFEES), Fairmont, West Virginia, he entered active duty at the Recruiting Main Station (RMS), Beckley, West Virginia. He completed his required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 16E (Hawk Fire Crewman). He was promoted to pay grade E-6, effective 1 October 1981.

On 20 November 1985, he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List. His separation document indicates he had 12 years, 4 months and 23 days of creditable service.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no evidence in the available records that the applicant was recommended for or awarded the ARCOM; therefore, he is not entitled to that award.

2. The evidence shows the applicant was processed for active duty in the AFEES, Fairmont, WV and enlisted onto active duty at the RMS, Beckley, WV.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_gdp___ _wtm____ _rtd____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001061562
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020124
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.020
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000050

    Original file (20110000050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his place of entry on active duty as Beckley, West Virginia, and his rank as specialist four, pay grade E-4. The applicant's DD Form 4/1, dated 20 January 1984, indicates that he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years in the rank of private, pay grade E-1. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows: a. he entered IADT on 23 January 1984 from Scottown, Ohio; b. he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090702C070212

    Original file (2003090702C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. The appropriate authority (a major general) approved the request for discharge on 12 November 1976 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03091704C070212

    Original file (03091704C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was discharged on 29 August 1991. Officers on active duty should submit a copy of the SMP contract, commissioning orders, Statement of Service for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes (DA Form 1506) or DD Form 214, to their respective Personnel Officer. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062612C070421

    Original file (2001062612C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: This time his DD Form 4/1 showed his HOR as Middletown, Connecticut; however, his active duty orders, dated 19 September 1989, showed his HOR as South Point, Ohio.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015330

    Original file (20120015330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * From 1989 until his discharge, his Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) showed a Texas address * His last reenlistment showed El Paso, Texas as his HOR * In order for his daughter to be eligible for educational benefits, he needs his HOR changed 3. The applicant's contention that his HOR should be changed to show the address in Texas vice the one in West Virginia was carefully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068695C070402

    Original file (2002068695C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided that persons separating from the service on their ETS would have their character of service determined by their overall record of service. Accordingly, absent evidence to the contrary, the Board must presume what the Army did at the time was correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071401C070402

    Original file (2002071401C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. However, he was 25 years of age at the time of his enlistment and was old enough to be responsible for his actions at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007509C070205

    Original file (20060007509C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dennis Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his separation code and Reentry (RE) Code be changed to a code that will allow him to enlist in another service. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058419C070421

    Original file (2001058419C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that his undesirable discharge was inequitable because he did not have a drinking problem when he entered the service and he was not offered a chance to rehabilitate himself when he obviously had a chronic and severe alcohol consumption problem that was exacerbated by his transfer to Germany. The board found that the applicant displayed traits of habits which rendered him unfit for further military service and recommended that he be discharged with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065951C070421

    Original file (2001065951C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his correct social security account number (SSAN) and that he was awarded a Purple Heart (PH). He also requests that his PH Certificate be corrected to show his correct SSAN and middle initial. This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.