| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. George D. Paxson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his correct last name and to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his records have his last name spelled incorrectly and he was advised by his recruiter to wait until his discharge to get it corrected. He goes on to state that his records show the last two letters of his last name spelled “ol”, when in fact it should be three letters spelled “all”. He also states that he was awarded the BSM for his service in Vietnam; however, it was never entered on his report of separation (DD Form 214). In support of his application he submits a copy of his birth certificate and a copy of his BSM Certificate.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Raleigh, North Carolina on 4 January 1967 for a period of 2 years. At the time of his enlistment he indicated that his last name was spelled with the last two letters of “ol” and that his date of birth (DOB) was 23 February 1948. His address at the time was in Bayboro, North Carolina in the county of Pamlico. He indicated that his mother’s first name was “Madeline” and his father’s first name was “Sulton”.
5. He completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 4 June 1967, for duty as a light weapons infantryman. He was assigned to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 9 May 1968. He was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) on 8 November 1967 and was awarded the Purple Heart for a wound to the right knee on 30 January 1968.
6. He departed Vietnam on 4 June 1968 and was transferred to Fort Benning, Georgia, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty on 18 December 1968. He had served 1 year, 11 months and 15 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the CIB and the Purple Heart. He was subsequently authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RNVGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM – FC) Unit Citation; however, there is no indication in the available records to show that it was ever entered in his records.
7. The birth certificate provided by the applicant shows that he was born in the county of Pamlico in Bayboro, North Carolina on 23 January 1948, to parents named Sulton and Madeline. The birth certificate shows the last three letters of his last name as ending in “all” instead of “ol”, as reflected in his military records.
8. The BSM Certificate provided by the applicant indicates that the applicant was awarded the BSM on 7 June 1968, for meritorious achievement while serving in the pay grade of E-5 in the 9th Infantry Division during the period of 16 June 1967 to 4 June 1968. A review of the applicant’s records failed to produce a copy of the orders awarding him the BSM.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board finds that the birth certificate provided by the applicant is sufficient evidence to show that his last name and DOB are incorrectly reflected in his records. Accordingly, his last name should be corrected by deleting the “last two letters of “ol” from his last name and replacing them with the letters “all.” Additionally, his DOB should be corrected to reflect 23 January 1948 instead of 23 February 1948, as currently reflected in his records.
2. Although there are no orders in the applicant’s records to show that he was awarded the BSM, the Board finds that the information contained on the BSM Certificate provided by the applicant contains credible information regarding his rank, unit and period of service in Vietnam. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that he was in fact awarded the BSM and an administrative error resulted in the BSM not being added to his records.
3. Likewise, the applicant was also authorized awards of the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and RVNCAHM –FC Unit Citation that were not included in his records. Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to do so at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by correcting the records of the individual concerned to show that instead of his last name ending in “ol”, it ends in “all”, that his DOB is 23 January 1948: and
b. by showing that he was awarded the BSM, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM – FC Unit Citation.
BOARD VOTE:
___gp___ ___mm__ ___tap __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____George D. Paxson_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001061093 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/02/21 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 2 | 100.0100/NAME CHG |
| 2. 60 | 107.0014/BSM |
| 3. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 4. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078375C070215
Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the CIB. Although the evidence of record does show that the applicant was an infantry second lieutenant while assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam, there is no evidence to show that he met the criteria for award of the CIB. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212
Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082730C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the BSM for service in Vietnam from 13 December 1967 to 24 June 1968 and it was never included on his DD Form 214. Accordingly, the applicant's records should be corrected to reflect the award of the BSM. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that he was awarded the BSM and by awarding the individual concerned the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090343C070212
On 6 November 1963, he transferred to Vietnam with his unit. While in Vietnam, his commander submitted a recommendation to award the applicant the award of the Silver Star for gallantry in action in Vietnam on 2 and 3 March 1964. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device that was not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001115C070205
Gerald Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 12 October 1967, for assignment to Company D, 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry Regiment as a light weapons infantryman. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the BSM w/”V” Device and by awarding him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015083C070206
Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 18 August 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 17 August 1972. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066812C070402
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the RVNCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062100C070421
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides Department of the Army policy for the administration of individual military decorations. The applicant clearly was awarded three awards of the BSM and his records should be corrected accordingly. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the BSM with “V” Device and 2 OLCs and by awarding him the RVNGC w/palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM – FC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018469
The applicant requests that his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and three awards of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). While the unit was awarded three PUCs during the Vietnam War, only two of the PUCs were awarded for the period in which the applicant served with the unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091209C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Although the available records do not contain evidence that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for his 19 June 1967 wound in Vietnam, the evidence of record clearly establishes his entitlement to that award. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for...