| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. George D. Paxson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Member | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6) promotion effective date and date of rank (DOR) be changed to 3 January 2000, and that he be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that soldiers in his unit with less promotion points were promoted ahead of him. He claims that his SSG/E-6 DOR of 2 May 2000 should be 3 January 2000. In support of his application, he provides a copy of an Inspector General (IG) report, dated 12 June 2000, issued by the Deputy IG, 143rd Transportation Command, Orlando, Florida.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he is currently serving as a
SSG/E-6 in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). He is presently assigned to the 196th Transportation Company, Kissimmee, Florida and serving in MOS 88M (Motor Transport Operator).
5. The record contains a November 1999 promotion standing list, published by the 143rd Transportation Command, Orlando, Florida. This report confirms that while he was serving in the 495th Transportation Company, Lakeland, Florida, the applicant was recommended for promotion in MOS 88M and added to the
143rd Transportation Command promotion standing list with a promotion point total of 503 points. Two other members of his unit who were also recommended for promotion in MOS 88M were also on this promotion standing list with promotion point totals of 402 and 429 points, respectively.
6. Orders Number 00-013-019 and 00-013-0020, dated 13 January 2000, issued by the Headquarters, 143rd Transportation Command, authorized the promotion of the two individuals who were on the same promotion standing list as the applicant in the same MOS with less promotion points. The promotion effective date and DOR established for both these individuals was 13 January 2000.
7. Orders Number 00-123-004, dated 2 May 2000, issued by Headquarters, 143rd Transportation Command, authorized the applicant’s promotion to
SSG/E-6, in MOS 88M, effective 2 May 2000.
8. On 12 June 2000, the Deputy IG, 143rd Transportation Command, responded to an inquiry from the applicant. The Deputy IG indicated that officials of the
143rd Transportation Command had determined that, in accordance with the governing Army regulation, the applicant should have been promoted to
SSG/E-6, effective 3 January 2000; and that his promotion effective date and DOR should be adjusted accordingly. In addition, they recommended that the applicant receive all back pay and allowances due as a result. Finally, the applicant was advised that his recourse to correct these errors was to apply to this Board for relief.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his SSG/E-6 DOR should be changed to 3 January 2000, and it finds this claim has merit.
2. The evidence of record contains an IG report that confirms that unit promotion officials admit they erred in the applicant’s promotion. These officials verify that based on his promotion standing list status and point total, the applicant should have been promoted to the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6, effective 3 January 2000. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to adjust the applicant’s SSG/E-6 promotion effective date and DOR accordingly and to provide him all back pay and allowances due as a result.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the SSG/E-6 promotion effective date and DOR of the individual concerned is 3 January 2000; and by providing him all back pay and allowances due as a result.
BOARD VOTE:
__GDP__ _ _WTM__ __RTD GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__George D. Paxson__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001060962 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/01/24 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | N/A |
| DISCHARGE REASON | N/A |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 21 | 102.0700 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012279
He provided a memorandum from the 191st CSSB, dated 27 December 2012, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and SSG, recommending the applicant for promotion to SGT. HRC memorandum for U.S. Army Promotion Work Centers, dated 22 February 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 March 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues, announcing promotion point cutoff scores for 1 March 2013. a. He provided a copy of his email to HRC, dated 3 June 2013,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103935C070208
Robert Rogers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) for the period 2003021-20040209 be corrected to show his grade as Staff Sergeant (SSG/pay grade E-6) and that he received a third award of the Army Commendation Medal. c. Orders 03-079-00005, Headquarters, 143rd TRANSCOM, Orlando, Florida, dated 20 March 2003,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083342C070215
He stated that the applicant was given an Article 15 by his battalion commander for returning home from the motor transport operators (88M) course due to the illness of his mother. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The evidence of record shows that the applicant was qualified in more than one MOS; however, his command chose to remove him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071280C070402
On 30 June 1995, the effective date of the MOS conversion, the applicant was reclassified into MOS 31R20P7. The applicant met all these requirements at the time of the MOS conversion and should have been converted to MOS 31S with the ASI of Y2 at that time. In view of the facts of this case, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate at this time to correct the effective date of the applicant’s reclassification into MOS 31S to 30 June 1995.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018970
He provided: * A copy of the promotion board proceedings, dated June 2010 * A copy of the amended promotion board proceedings, dated May 2011 * A DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet) * A noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) * A DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) Scorecard) * Two DA Forms 3349 (Physical Profile) * Two DA Forms 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Actions (FLAG)) * Army Training Transcript * Printout from the Army Training Requirements and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007515C070205
Karmin S. Jenkins | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This official stated that a request for grade determination for the purpose of enlistment in the RA was approved in the grade of E-5, provided the applicant was otherwise qualified and enlists for retraining in MOS 88M under Option 3 (U. S. Army Training of Choice Enlistment Option only – No First Assignment could be guaranteed). The applicant's military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067506C070402
The promotion recommended list for the promotion of enlisted personnel for the Tampa Recruiting Battalion, dated 24 August 2001, confirm that the applicant was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5 and that she had attained 638 points. The personnel administrator concludes that it should be the MPD’s responsibility to correct this problem, but instead of meeting this responsibility, they require the applicant to apply to this Board for correction of military records. The Chief, Promotions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015805
He states: * he wasnt promoted in a timely manner due to administrative errors * he made cut-off promotion points score of 350 on 8 August 1999, 1 October 2007, and 1 January 2009 in MOS 92Y (Unit Supply Specialist) * his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) shows his promotion points was 350 on 8 August 1999 * Installation Management Command (IMCOM) reviewed his records and didnt see any flags, adverse actions or a promotion bar 3. His service record does not indicate he was recommended for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059881C070421
She claims that her original promotion was determined to be erroneous by the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) based on the fact that she was in a nonpromotable status. Subsequent to being evaluated by the MMRB, on 1 November 1999, the applicant was erroneously promoted to SSG in MOS 31R. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was erroneously promoted to SSG, in MOS 31R, subsequent to the MMRB concluding that she could not perform duties in that MOS based on her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009503
The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the USAR on 11 April 1991 for 8 years. She contends that her USAR discharge date should be changed to 10 April 2000 on Orders 08-128-000002 to coincide with her ETS date and that she attended UTA's on 8 and 9 April 2000. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders 08-128-000002, dated 7 May 2008, to show an effective date of 10 April 2000, by...