| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That he realizes he made a mistake. He was having family problems. The mistake has haunted him ever since. He tried to reenlist but he cannot unless he gets his discharge upgraded. He cannot pursue a career in law enforcement unless his discharge is upgraded. He requests a hearing. He provides his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, and a letter of support dated 5 August 2001 from a friend as supporting evidence.
NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION: Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in a memorandum prepared to reflect the Board's original consideration of his case on 26 April 2001 (AR2000047436).
Army Regulation 635-200 governs the separation of enlisted personnel. In pertinent part, it states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. An honorable discharge may be furnished when disqualifying entries in the soldier’s military record are outweighed by subsequent honest and faithful service over a greater period of time during the current term of service.
The Manual for Courts Martial United States, 2000 edition states that the maximum punishment for being absent from one’s unit, organization, or other place of duty for more than 30 days is a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant voluntarily requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. His request included an admission of guilt. Had he accepted trial by court-martial instead of requesting discharge and been found guilty, he would have had a Federal conviction on his records and possibly a punitive discharge.
2. The applicant’s record of service during the 8 months he creditably served, out of an enlistment commitment of 4 years, was not so meritorious as to warrant an upgrade of his discharge. The Board is cognizant of the applicant’s subsequent good record while at the police academy; however, this factor does not warrant the relief requested although it may be a factor for civilian authorities to consider in granting his desire to pursue a career in law enforcement.
3. Although the applicant requests a (personal) hearing of his case, there is no statutory or regulatory right to a formal hearing. The Board receives over 10,000 applications each year but normally grants fewer than 15 formal hearings a year. Formal hearings are granted when the Board determines that a case is so complex or the records so incomplete that only sworn testimony can provide the necessary information. The Board concludes that a formal hearing is not required in this case.
4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest submissions and arguments are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse its previous decision.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rvo___ __jpi___ __wdp___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001060928 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011129 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19890107 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086242C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Based on the applicant’s disciplinary record and poor duty performance, his unit commander recommended his discharge under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200, for misconduct. The Board notes the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded in order to enhance his civilian career opportunities and it carefully considered the letters of support he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071267C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board has determined that the applicant’s overall military service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel sufficient to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068072C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054138C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The Board notes that the applicant signed documents stating that he understood that he was being separated as an alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006300
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge. Accordingly , the applicant was separated, on 10 March 2006, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct, with a general discharge under honorable conditions after completing 5 years, 2 months, and 7 days of creditable active service with no lost time. On 9 May 2008, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072938C070403
APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge and change of his reentry (RE) code so that he can reenlist in the Florida National Guard. The Army Discharge Review Board, following a personal appearance hearing, with counsel, denied the applicant's request to change the character of and reason for the discharge. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067570C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 23 January 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2002067570SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20020228TYPE OF DISCHARGE(GD)DATE OF DISCHARGE20010117DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR 635-200 Chapter 14DISCHARGE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087930C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His records indicated he had not completed the required civilian or military education by the date the board convened (6 March 2001). DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057195C070420
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was discharged from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) upon completion of his 8-year statutory service obligation instead of being discharged after being twice nonselected for promotion to the rank of major. However, in a legal opinion obtained from the Air Force Reserve Command, the Director of Military Law opined, in effect, that because the applicant had been twice nonselected for promotion and had in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057824C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that a record of nonjudicial punishment (DA Form 2627) be removed from the restricted fiche of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). APPLICANT STATES : That the nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him 17 years ago when he was a private.