| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Walter Avery, Jr. | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
2. The applicant requests the correction of his records to show that he was paid for 28 days of accrued leave and not 50 days, as reflected on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty).
3. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly indicates he was paid for 50 days of accrued leave.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 3 May 1995. He was honorably separated on 24 May 2001.
5. His DD Form 214 dated 31 July 1985 reflects that he was paid for 32 days of accrued leave.
6. His DD Form 214 dated 24 May 2001 reflects that he was paid for 50 days of accrued leave.
7. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. They advised that a review of the applicant’s master military pay account indicates that upon separation on 24 May 2001 he was paid for 28 days of accrued leave. They recommend correction of the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect 28 days accrued leave paid. The opinion was made available to the applicant for comment. No comment has been received.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-10 provides, in pertinent part, that since 10 February 1976, soldiers can sell no more than 60 days leave one time during a military career, except as authorized by Section 501 of Title 37 United States Code as implemented by the Department of the Defense Pay Manual.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s contention that he was paid for 28 days of accrued leave and not 50 is supported by his records and the information available. The applicant was previously paid for 32 days of accrued leave, which would leave a maximum of 28 leave days remaining for possible sale. His master military pay account confirms that upon his 24 May 2001 separation he was paid for 28 days; therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect 28 days accrued leave paid.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 dated 24 May 2001 to reflect 28 days accrued leave paid.
BOARD VOTE:
___kak__ ___mdm ____tl___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_________Karol A. Kennedy______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001060122 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020423 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 121.02 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071650C070402
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to reinstate 6.5 days leave that he lost in 2001, and that he be paid for that leave. On 28 August 2002 the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Indianapolis substantiated the applicant’s contentions that he was paid for 52.5 days leave in October 2001, and that he lost 6.5 days of leave. He was paid for 52.5 days leave upon his retirement in October 2001, and lost 6.5 days of leave as he contends and as substantiated by DFAS.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080141C070215
The applicant's LES for the period of 1 August through 27 August 2000 shows that the applicant was paid for .5 days of unused leave at the time of separation. His DD Form 214 indicates in block 16 that he was paid for 63.5 days of accrued leave. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing on the DD Form 214 dated 27 August 2000, pertaining to the individual concerned, that he was paid for .5 days of leave instead of 63.5...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011752C070206
At the time of his REFRAD he had 52.5 days of accrued leave. The applicant applied to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records to have his records corrected to reflect that his 52.5 days of accrued leave had been restored to his account and on 2 October 2000, that Board denied his request. However, there was a 6 day break in service from the time he was REFRAD from the Army and entered active duty with the Air Force.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058195C070420
His DD Form 214 (Item 16) also showed “Days Accrued Leave Paid”, to indicate he was paid for the accrued leave. The evidence of record shows that the applicant has a break in service from 26 July through 27 August 2000. Payment for his accrued leave was initially indicated on his DD Form 214 upon his discharge, and the break in service clearly precludes carrying the leave forward.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03610
A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommended denial, indicating that a review of the disability processing records does not show any variances from normal procedures for a member in the Air Force Disability Evaluation System (DES). Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC indicated that their records show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03242
She used 15 days during FY07. Additionally, paragraph 4.1.4, Use of Leave, recommends members be given the opportunity to take at least one leave period of 14 consecutive days or more each FY and encourages them to use the 30 days of leave they accrue each year. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the documentation submitted in support of her appeal, we find no evidence that at the time of her separation from the Air Force, a condition existed that rendered her unable to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089557C070403
The Board considered the following evidence: His DD Form 214 with an ending date of 16 August 2002 shows he was paid 10.0 days of accrued leave. The evidence of record shows the applicant was paid 50.0 days of accrued during his service in the U.S. Navy.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00841
FMFO states the applicant had accrued nine and one-half days of leave while on his 91-day Military Personnel Appropriation (MPA) tour; however, he used three days of leave prior to the end of his tour. FMFQ states that during the applicant’s involuntary recall to EAD period, he accrued 60.5 days of leave of which he used 48 days. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-00841 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007233C070208
On 12 September 2003 the applicant requested 128 days of leave from 25 January 2004 to 31 May 2004, 108 days of which were accrued leave, and 20 days of which were permissive TDY (25 January 2004 to 13 February 2004). The MC was further informed that there were no provisions under the law that allowed Soldiers to cash in leave after separation from military service; however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records had the authority to approve request for exceptions to policy. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012023
The NGB official further indicates that the applicant was authorized leave during the period 24 through 28 October 2005. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record by showing the applicant had sufficient accrued leave to take ordinary leave during the period 24 through 28 October 2005, that no debt was incurred by the applicant for non-performance of duty during this period, and to reimburse the applicant any amount of this erroneous debt already collected. ...