Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059778C070421
Original file (2001059778C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 15 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059778

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Joyce A. Hall Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Stanley Kelley Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications, which preclude reenlistment.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that at the time of his discharge, he had a family situation that needed to be taken care of. He was not granted leave so he requested to be released from active duty. His released was to prevent him from further hurting his career by doing something that he would regret. He was discharged with a reentry code of “3” and he now wish to have this changed to a “1” so that he can reenlist.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 17 April 1997, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army. He completed combat basic training. Shortly after reporting to his advanced individual training, the applicant experienced problems in achieving passing scores in academic training. He was counseled on 11 July 1997, for failure to achieve a passing score of 70%.

The applicant’s records indicate that he accepted a summarized Article 15 for failure to repair, however, the particulars surrounding the incident is missing from his files.

The applicant was counseled on two more occasions for his attitude towards the United States Army Aviation, his decision to be released from active duty, his blatant disrespect toward the drill sergeants and the company commander and for the summarized Article 15.

On 1 August 1997, the applicant was found physically qualified for separation.

On 28 August 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11, with an entry-level status performance and conduct discharge.
The commander’s recommendation was based on the applicant’s inability to adapt socially or emotionally to military life and his negative attitude toward the United States Army. The commander further stated, that the applicant has shown a lack of aptitude and ability on prescribed examinations, which is required for successful completion of training. The applicant has also failed to respond to counseling and rehabilitation. He acknowledged notification and was advised of his rights by legal counsel of the basis for the contemplated separation action. The applicant was afforded the opportunity to submit statements in his own behalf, but declined to do so.

On the same day, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation, waived the rehabilitative transfer requirements and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized discharge.

On 18 September 1997, the applicant was discharged in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulations 635-200, paragraph 11 (entry-level status performance and conduct) with an “uncharacterized” character of service discharge. He had completed 5 months, and 2 days of creditable active service.
He was given a reenlistment code of RE-3.

Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part for an entry level separation when the service member has not completed more that 180 days before the date of initiation of the separation action, it provides for the issuance of an uncharacterized discharge.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the United States Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons who have lost time, local bars to reenlistment and those discharged under the provisions of chapter 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 are assigned a RE-3.

Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program). Therefore, since enlistment criteria does change, and since the applicant have the right to apply for a waiver, it is suggested that periodic visits to the local recruiting station should be made to determine the eligibility and when to apply for a waiver.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant was separated and assigned a reenlistment code in accordance with regulations then in effect.

3. There appears to be no basis for removal of the reentry code from the applicant’s record. The disqualification upon which the code was based, however, can be waived for reenlistment purposes.

4. In view of the circumstances in this case, the assigned reentry code was and still is appropriate.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__inw___ __sk____ __kah___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059778
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE UNCHAR
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19970918
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, Chapter 11
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605117C070209

    Original file (9605117C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 January 1993, the applicant was notified that his commander was recommending a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 11-3a, with an entry level status performance and conduct discharge. On 21 January 1993, the applicant was discharged in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulations 635-200, paragraph 11-3a (entry level status performance and conduct) with an “uncharacterized “ character of service discharge. Certain persons who have received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067905C070402

    Original file (2002067905C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. The applicant signed the DA Form 4126-R (Bar to Reenlistment Certificate), which stated that he was counseled on the implications of the action and his right to appeal. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068819C070402

    Original file (2002068819C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210, Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program. In view of the fact that HQDA denied the applicant’s request to reenlist, the assigned RE code of 4 was and still is appropriate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006420

    Original file (20080006420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations) by reason of entry-level status, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 29 June 2007, the applicant was discharged by reason of entry-level status after completing 5 months and 27 days of active military service. A separation code of "JGA" applies to persons who are separated under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064793C070421

    Original file (2001064793C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code, which would allow reenlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2001064793SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20020326TYPE OF DISCHARGEHDDATE OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000340C070206

    Original file (20050000340C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 December 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050000340 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A 1 November 1991 memorandum informed the applicant that a Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001726

    Original file (20090001726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This paragraph also provides that only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his or her period of enlistment or period for which called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training, or where required under specific reason for separation, unless an entry level status separation (uncharacterized) is warranted. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) provides, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068120C070402

    Original file (2002068120C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code, which would allow reenlistment. Paragraph 3-10 of the foregoing regulation provides that an individual, who was last separated in pay grade E-1 through E-2, regardless of years of service, is not eligible for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608600C070209

    Original file (9608600C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-43, in effect at the time of the applicant’s discharge and currently in effect, provides that, when discharged because of conscientious objection, Army Regulation 600-43 will be entered as the separation authority and “RE-4” will be entered as the reentry code on the applicant’s DD Form 214. Effective 2 October 1989, the regulation was changed indicating that Army Regulation 601-210 determines RE and regulates the assignment of the RE code; that reentry codes are not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008892

    Original file (20090008892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 May 2008, the immediate commander recommended the applicant be separated for failure to adapt to the military training environment and its associated lifestyle for he did not complete the required training and often quit entry-level training requirements. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator [SPD] Codes) provides, in pertinent part, that the reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and their corresponding SPD codes will be entered on the Soldiers' DD Forms...