Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059769C070421
Original file (2001059769C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 30 August 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059769

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti . Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor Chairperson
Mr. Christopher J. Posser Member
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was eligible for retired pay for non-regular service (service in the USAR not on extended active duty) when he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

APPLICANT STATES: He was transferred to the Retired Reserve and has now been told that, due to clerical errors which were not his fault, he is not entitled to retired pay.

In a supplemental letter dated 9 July 2001, the applicant elaborates that he had been given retirement statements on several occasions between 1962 and 1967 that showed that he had 17 years, 9 months and 23 days of creditable service. However, those statements were missing retirement points for service he had performed, and he was told by the (then) Reserve Component Personnel and Administration Center (RCPAC) that he was only missing two weeks of active duty to “make my Statement of Service record complete for creditable retirement years.”

In 1995 he was informed that service in the Retired Reserve was not creditable for retirement purposes. He asks “Why in the world did you transfer me to the Retired Reserve in 1968, without consulting me at all, when I was only 46 years of age, did not request it, needed only 2 years, 2 months and 8 days for 20 creditable [years for] retirement, and had ample time to work for it?” The applicant concludes that he was improperly denied the opportunity to complete a questionable amount of time.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was inducted on active duty on 8 August 1942 and was commissioned on 17 March 1943. He remained on active duty in his commissioned status until 25 February 1946, at which time he reverted to the Officer Reserve Corps (ORC). He was commissioned in the USAR on 1 July 1949 and remained assigned to the Ready Reserve (an active status), being promoted to lieutenant colonel.

On 9 November 1966 the RCPAC sent the applicant a letter informing him that he had accrued the minimum number of retirement points to remain in an active status. However, he was told that since he had 19 years, 9 months and 23 days of qualifying service, he would be retained until he earned 20 qualifying years of service or until 30 June 1968, whichever was earlier.






On 29 January 1968 a letter was sent to the applicant confirming the information discussed between him and a member of the staff of RCPAC on 24 January 1968. In that letter it was stated that the applicant had erroneously been given a letter informing him that he had 19 years, 9 months and 23 days of qualifying service. Due to that error, the RCPAC had waived the mandatory removal scheduled for 30 June 1968 and would retain him in an active status as long as he earned a minimum of 27 retirement points a year. In the record of phone conversation which generated the letter to the applicant, it was recorded that the applicant was told that he actually had 17 years, 9 months and 23 days of creditable service.

On 4 March 1968 the applicant wrote the RCPAC stating “It is with regret that I must request that I be removed from Active Status in the United States Army Reserve . . . recent events in my personal and business life make it absolutely impossible for me to meet the minimum standards for retention. There is no point in my making periodic requests for waivers and creating additional work for your office when I honestly realize the futility of the situation. As regards possible retirement, it may seem foolish to lose the monetary benefits; however, I cannot morally justify retirement reimbursement anyway. I have always felt that it was an honor and a privilege to have served my Country, and I have been repaid many times over, through educational opportunities, home mortgage, etc.”

Based on that request, on 1 May 1968 the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. Contrary to the applicant’s contention, he was well aware of how many creditable years of service he had at the time he submitted his request to be removed from an active status, and knew that his request would result in the loss of retired pay at age 60.

2. As such, the Board must conclude that the applicant was properly transferred to the Retired Reserve without sufficient qualifying years of service for retired pay.








3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___lds___ ____rvo _ ___cjp___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059769
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010830
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.02
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006251C070208

    Original file (040006251C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A statement of the applicant’s retirement points, dated 21 June 2004, shows that he had 21 years, 8 months, and 8 days of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60. Nonetheless, the applicant was eligible for retired pay on 9 September 1988, the date that he was 60 years old, and more than 10 years after his transfer to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053035C070420

    Original file (2001053035C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his retirement point account be corrected to show that he has 20 years qualifying for retired pay at age 60 and that he be provided retired pay. The applicant states, in effect, that he is credited with only 18 years qualifying for retired pay, but he served for 20 qualifying years. His retirement point account should then show a total of 19 years qualifying for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085778C070212

    Original file (2003085778C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was not given the proper number of points for his service and has been unjustly denied his Retired Pay. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was established as an independent agency by act of June 28, 1937 (50 Statute 319).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074087C070403

    Original file (2002074087C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier appeal to have his records corrected to show that he is qualified for retired pay at age 60. Considering all the aspects of the case; but especially, that the applicant that he had completed 50 percent of C&GSC and had not required a waiver for his promotion to lieutenant colonel; that he had served consecutive qualifying years from the time entered active duty; that he had been making a real contribution the USAR by teaching classes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066265C070421

    Original file (2001066265C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be granted a United States Army Reserve (USAR) Retirement, effective when he reached age 60. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was illegally denied a USAR Retirement at age 60, when he had previously been certified as eligible for retirement in 1979. On 16 February 2000, the ARPERSCOM, in response to an application for retired pay at age 60 from the applicant, informed him that he was not eligible for retired pay at age 60 because he had only 8 years of...

  • CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2010-048

    Original file (2010-048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On June 16, 2009, she was told that she could transfer from the ISL to the IRR to drill for points without pay. states that all Reserve officers except those on the ISL and retired officers are considered to be in an “active status.” Chapter 7.A.3.a. Whether serving on active duty or in the Reserve, officers who fail twice of selection are eligible for separation or retention, and under Chapter 7.A.8.d.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086419C070212

    Original file (2003086419C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show that he completed 20 qualifying years of service which would allow him to be eligible for United States Army Reserve (USAR) retirement. On 16 March 1967, the applicant was again notified that he was subject to mandatory removal from the Active Reserve because he failed to earn sufficient points during one or both of the retirement years following an unsatisfactory year for which a waiver was granted. It provides, in...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2002-136

    Original file (2002-136.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that in January 1989 he received a letter from the Commandant, endorsed by CCGD one, stating that the applicant had failed to earn the minimum 27 points required to remain in the Active Reserve for the anniversary year ending September 2, 1988. The Chief Counsel stated that notwithstanding the Coast Guard's delay in processing the applicant's reserve application and oath of office, the applicant is not entitled to a correction of his record to provide point credit for drills that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009500C070208

    Original file (20040009500C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded retirement points for the period that he was denied the opportunity to serve and drill with his unit, back pay and allowance for all drills and service that he could have performed with his unit, consideration of promotion opportunities he missed while he was kept away from his unit, and a refund of payments made for coverage of SGLI (Service members Life Insurance) he was required to make after he was restored to duty with his unit. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004093

    Original file (20080004093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her discharge from the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and her records corrected to show she transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant provides orders, dated 22 July 1998, assigning her to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement); discharge orders, dated 21 October 1999; and her notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (her 20-year letter). If a Soldier does not earn the required 50 retirement points during a retirement year and the...