| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Kathleen A. Newman | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Report of Separation and Record of Service (NGB Form 22) be corrected to show an effective date of separation of 26 January 1999.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that the NGB Form 22 issued to him upon his discharge from the Army National Guard (ARNG) erroneously shows his effective date of discharge as 26 January 2000. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his NGB Form 22 and his United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) appointment and assignment order.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered his last enlistment in the ARNG on 9 April 1997. The NGB Form 22 issued to him at the completion of this enlistment shows in item 8b (effective date) that he was discharged from this period of service in the ARNG on 26 January 2000. Item 10a (net service this period) indicates that completed 2 years, 9 months, and 18 days of net service during this enlistment and item 23 (authority and reason) shows that he was separated under the provisions of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 635-100, chapter 5, paragraph a(7) and that the reason for his separation was appointment in another Armed Force.
5. Orders Number PA-387, dated 24 February 1999, issued by Department of the Air Force, authorized the applicant’s appointment as a second lieutenant (2LT) in the USAFR, effective 27 January 1999, and his assignment to Dover Air Force Base, Dover, Delaware.
6. NGR 635-100, establishes the standards, policies and procedures governing the separation of commissioned officers of the ARNG. Paragraph 5a(7) of that regulation provides the authority for the separation upon acceptance of a commission or appointment in another Armed Force, US Public Health Service, Environmental Sciences Services Administration, US Military Academy, US Naval Academy, US Air Forces Academy, and the US Coast Guard Academy, or upon enlistment in the National Guard.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the contention of the applicant that the 26 January 2000 effective date of discharge from the ARNG listed in item 8b (effective date) of his NGB Form 22 is incorrect and it finds this claim has merit.
2. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG by reason of appointment in another Armed Force based on his appointment in the USAFR on 27 January 1999. Therefore, the Board finds the date listed in item 8b (effective date) of his NGB Form 22 was obviously the result of an administrative error and it concludes it would be appropriate to correct it at this time by showing the effective date of his separation from the ARNG was 26 January 1999.
3. The Board also finds that a correction to item 8b (effective date) as outlined above would necessitate a change in the entry contained in 10a (net service this period) to of the applicant’s NGB Form 22 from 2 years, 9 months, 18 days as it currently reads to 1 year, 9 months, 18 days as it should read based on the change in discharge effective date.
4. Although the Board has no authority to correct State ARNG records, governed under Title 32, the Board is of the opinion that so far as the Department of the Army is concerned, it would be in the best interest of justice to correct the ARNG records of the individual concerned as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be changed by showing that the individual concerned was discharged from his ARNG enlistment that began on 9 April 1997, effective 26 January 1999; that the net service he completed for this period of ARNG service was 1 year, 9 months, and 18 days; and by issuing him a corrected NGB Form 22 that reflects these changes in items 8b (effective date) and 10a (net service this period).
BOARD VOTE:
__RJW__ __KAN__ __REB __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Raymond J. Wagner__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001059740 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/10/25 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017672C071029
Gerald J. Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the USMC and entered active duty in that status on 6 April 1999, as evidenced by the DD Form 4 and DD Form 214 on file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 8b of the NGB Form 22 in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013029
The applicant contends, in effect, that he would have continued on active duty until his MRD for maximum years of commissioned service (30 June 2015) had it not been for the improperly conducted CY11 ARNG AGR REFRAD Board which selected him for REFRAD. Though it is not possible to know whether he would have been selected by a "properly" conducted REFRAD board, it is reasonable to presume he would have served until 30 June 2015 if he had not been selected for REFRAD by the CY11 ARNG AGR...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021168
The applicant provides: * Personnel Qualification Record * USCG Academy cadet records * ARNG enlistment documents * NGB Form 23 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * 1995 OCS Diploma * ARNG Retirement Credits Record * June 1996 through 1997- November 2003 RPASs * 1997 appointment memorandum * 1999 DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * 2007 college transcript * 2011 Memorandum for Record * 2011 Retirement Points memorandum * 2011 Legal Review of Retirement Points Issue...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005546
An NGB Memorandum for [Applicant], subject: Non-retention for Continued Service on the Title 10 AGR Program, dated 3 August 2011, notified the applicant that the Calendar Year 2011 (CY11) ARNG AGR Officer REFRAD Board convened from 20-24 June 2011. The applicant elected to apply for retirement, was REFRAD on 31 August 2012, and retired effective 1 September 2012. c. Subsequent to approval of the CY11 ARNG AGR REFRAD Board, the Office of the DAIG received three separate complaints alleging...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065886C070421
The applicant's service personnel records show he was appointed in the ORARNG and was granted temporary Federal Recognition on 29 June 1992. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows the June 1992 request for Federal Recognition was denied by the Chief, NGB. c. Correct all personnel and pay records to show that the individual concerned was appointed in the ORARNG, in the grade of CW2, with the MOS 550A, effective 29 June 1992 and has served in that grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020160
The applicant requests, in effect: * Correction of her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show a date earlier than 23 December 1980 * Correction of item 16 (High School Graduate or Equivalent) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" vice "No" 2. The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 28 March 1980 and she was separated from the USAR on 22 December 1980 for the purpose of enlisting in the ARNG. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010057C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he was entitled to retired pay at age 60 with completion of 18 years of qualifying service and that he be issued an 18 year letter due to separation for a medical condition which impacted his ability to make personal decisions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated on 29 October 1990 from the ALARNG under the provisions of NGR 635-100, due to termination of his Federal Recognition. Records show the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011029
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered military service on 2 February 1985. An electronic PQR shows the applicant's pay entry basic date (PEBD) as "850202" [2 February 1985]. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 14 September 2000 incorrectly shows the date he entered active duty for this period of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021378
The applicant's military records show he served in the Regular Army from 10 September 1975 to 9 September 1978 and in the U.S. Army Reserve from 10 September 1978 to 25 June 1979. He provided a copy of his letter to the AGDRB, dated 19 November 2009, wherein he stated although he had worn the E-9 rank and served as a SGM for over 3 years, he had not completed 2 years of service after completing the Sergeants Major Academy, so he was retired as an E-8. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000889C070206
The applicant states that his DOR should be 31 October 1984, that his total prior Reserve service should be 10 years, that his total service for pay should be 17 years, that his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) and date awarded should be "95B20" 9 May 1972, that his highest level of education is 2 years college, Associate of Arts Degree, and that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one bronze service star. The evidence shows that the applicant served...