| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John E. Denning | Member | |
| Ms. Terry L. Placek | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his separation papers show that he served at least 8 more days of active duty.
APPLICANT STATES: His doctor said he was unfit for civilian life and should be retained on active duty until he either received a pension from the Army or his mental condition improved.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 August 1996.
On 15 October 1996 the applicant was counseled by his first sergeant that he was being recommended for an entry level status (ELS) performance and conduct separation. In that counseling the first sergeant outlined how the applicant had been referred to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) hospital for observation by the Behavior Medicine Clinic at Ireland Army Hospital, and was transferred from the DVA hospital to Wright Patterson Army Hospital for further treatment. The first sergeant then summarized the conversation he had with the applicant, which included the applicant’s statement that he had the mental problem prior to enlisting, and that he would accept an ELS discharge since it was the quickest way to be discharged. The applicant signed the counseling form and circled the block indicating that he concurred with the contents of the counseling session.
The applicant was then formally notified of his commander’s intent to recommend his discharge, he did not contest that recommendation, and the appropriate authority approved that recommendation.
On 22 October 1996 the applicant was given an uncharacterized discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11.
In 1982 the Department of Defense directed the various military departments to implement a new separation program, effective 1 October l982. This program essentially provides for the separation, in ELS, of new personnel who are recommended for separation during their initial 180 days of service, usually due to their inability to complete their training. These personnel will be granted an uncharacterized discharge, unless they are being discharged for misconduct wherein a discharge under other than honorable conditions is warranted. An honorable discharge will be granted to personnel in ELS only if their service is so
outstanding as to warrant an exception to policy by the service secretary concerned. Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 provides for ELS discharges for Army personnel.
Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 3-2, specifies that a presumption will be made that a soldier was in sound physical and mental condition upon entering active service except for physical disabilities noted and recorded at the time of entry, and that any disease or injury discovered after a soldier entered active service, with the exception of congenital and hereditary conditions, that was not due to the member’s own misconduct, will be considered in line of duty. Paragraph 4-19b of this regulation states that a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) may decide that a soldier’s physical defect Existed Prior to Service (EPTS), but must then determine whether the condition was aggravated by military service. If the PEB determines that a soldier has an unfitting EPTS condition which was service aggravated, the PEB must determine the degree of disability that is in excess of the degree existing at the time of entrance into the service. The method of determining the percentage of disability to be awarded in such cases is outlined in appendix B, item B-10 of this regulation.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. By his own admission, the applicant’s mental illness existed prior to his entry in the military.
2. The presumption of medical fitness at the time of enlistment only holds true if the enlistee honestly lists all of his or her medical history on the entry physical health questionnaire. Since it would appear that the applicant concealed his history of mental illness, the presumption of fitness does not apply in his case.
3. Since the applicant’s mental illness was not service connected, the Army had no obligation to retain him on active duty to provide medical treatment. For the same reason, law and regulation prohibited the Army from giving him a separation due to physical unfitness (e.g., pension).
4. It is noted that the applicant had consented to an ELS separation because it was the quickest way to be discharged. The applicant, not the Army wanted his separation expedited.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___tlp ___ ____fne _ ___jed___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010913 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707872
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707872C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090390C070212
In the processing of that formal LOD investigation, a statement was obtained from the physician who had made the entry that the applicant had stated she had been taking anti-psychotic medications prior to AT. As the illness progresses, psychotic symptoms develop: The preponderance of evidence supports a finding that the applicant’s schizophrenia existed prior to her entry on active duty during her AT, and there is no evidence of any event which may have aggravated that condition.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709066
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 October 1981 for a period of 3 years and entered active duty on the same date. It further opined that the MEB and PEB findings were correct, supported by substantial evidence, were not in violation of any law or regulation, and that there is no basis for changing the applicant’s military records. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078065C070215
He has indicated to me that he will take medication if he has to." Chapter 4 of that regulation provides the conditions under which Army Reserve officers may be discharged from their status as Reserves of the Army. As such, if the applicant was considered by an MEB and PEB, all indications are that he would have been separated without disability benefits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064097C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00286
The Board next considered the rating at separation from military service. The Board considered impairments attributed to the CI’s PTSD in its overall §4.130 rating recommendation for bipolar disorder. The Board determined therefore that none of the stated conditions were subject to service disability rating.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507123C070209
On 23 May 1979 the Board denied another application from him requesting a medical retirement. While in basic training, on 25 August 1971 he requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9, due to a medical condition which was disqualifying for enlistment but not for retention and which existed at the time of his enlistment. He was then diagnosed as having minor chronic low back pain with no organic basis.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021047
The applicant states: I believe the narrative discharge of "disability existed prior to service," item 28 of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active Duty)) is incorrect because of the lack of evidence and the presence of contradicting evidence at the time of the rating from the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). Studies have shown that 5-10 percent of patients seeing a spine specialist for low back pain will have either a spondylolysis or isthmic spondylolisthesis. The PEB did...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709066C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) be changed to reflect that his current psychiatric condition did not exist prior to his entry in the service. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 October 1981 for a period of 3 years and entered active duty on the same date. It further...