Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059607C070421
Original file (2001059607C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 20 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059607


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Vic Whitney Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Jennifer L. Prater Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. The applicant states that, while trying to obtain an identification card, it was discovered that he was no longer in the Ready Reserve and had been discharged. He never received the letter from the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) notifying him of his options. He believed that he had elected transfer to the Retired Reserve at an earlier date.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he was serving in a unit of the Army Reserve (USAR) in the pay grade of O5. Effective 15 June 1998, he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) at his own request.

5. According to the advisory opinion provided by the AR-PERSCOM, the applicant was discharged effective 1 September 2000, for failure to respond to an option letter that was mailed to his address of record. Because he had failed to earn the required 50 retirement points during his previous retirement year to remain in an active status, he was discharged. The advisory opinion notes that the applicant was discharged in accordance with regulations, but that favorable action on his request was recommended. The applicant failed to respond to the advisory opinion in over 2 ½ months.

6. Army Regulation 135-175 provides for the separation of officers. It provides that an officer who has 20 or more years of qualifying service for retirement and fails to attain 50 retirement points during the retirement year will be removed from an active status by discharge or, if requested, transfer to the Retired Reserve.

7. Army Regulation 140-10 prescribes the policy and procedures for transfer to the Retired Reserve. It provides for transfer to the Retired Reserve for soldiers who have completed a minimum of 20 qualifying years for retired pay at age 60. It also provides that the individual must request transfer to the Retired Reserve or be discharged.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was discharged in accordance with policy and regulations and there was no error in that discharge.

2. Notwithstanding the appropriateness of the discharge action, it would be in the interest of justice to allow the applicant to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by:

a.       revoking the discharge orders of the individual concerned effective 1 September 2000; and

b.       showing that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 September 2000.

BOARD VOTE:

___jp___ __rs____ ___mm__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____Jennifer L. Prater___
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059607
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011120
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 136.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086873C070212

    Original file (2003086873C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge be revoked and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The opinion notes that the applicant was notified of his pending discharge and his option to request transfer to the Retired Reserve but he failed to respond. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063847C070421

    Original file (2001063847C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that as a member of the IRR, who had completed 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay, he was required to earn a minimum of 50 points in each subsequent RYE; however, he failed to earn 50 retirement points, was declared an unsatisfactory participant, and was discharged. The Board notes that the applicant’s ARPC Form 249-2-E, dated 23 February 2001, shows that he completed 20 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes and that he meets...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065410C070421

    Original file (2001065410C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge be revoked and he be reinstated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR). He was requested to complete an attached election of options and was given the options of requesting transfer to the Retired Reserve, requesting a one-time waiver to the requirement to remove him from an active status (with appropriate supporting documentation indicating nonparticipation was due to circumstances beyond his control), or requesting discharge. an officer (other than a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054819C070420

    Original file (2001054819C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AR-PERSCOM Orders D-12-064528, dated 8 December 2000, show the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR. Paragraph 3-3.2 (Participation after qualifying for retirement) states that an Army National Guard or USAR officer, warrant officer, or enlisted soldier who has accrued 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay (10 U.S. Code 1331 and 1332) must attain 50 retirement points annually to be retained in an active status in the Selected Reserve, Individual Ready Reserve, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089516C070403

    Original file (2003089516C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he should be reinstated in an active status, retroactive to 4 March 2002, issued orders awarding retirement points for his language training by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM), as detailed on his DA Form 1380s (Record of Individual Performance of Reserve Duty Training), and promotion to colonel. The 99 th RST stated that the applicant was discharged for failing to earn 50 points in a retirement year as required by regulation. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056493C070420

    Original file (2001056493C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be given a Fitness for Duty Evaluation (FFDE), that his transfer to the Retired Reserve be revoked, that he be returned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), and that he be promoted to colonel in accordance with the 28 January 2000 Standby Advisory Board selection for such. The AR-PERSCOM Command Surgeon provided an advisory opinion which he states, in effect, that: 1) the term he used, “temporary medical disqualification,” was not meant in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075415C070403

    Original file (2002075415C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It indicated that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two option notification letters after failing to maintain an active status by earning the required 50 points in the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) on 11 July 1997. The evidence of record confirms that on 18 February 2000, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR for failure to respond to two notification and option letters after failing to maintain active status by earning 50...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059195C070421

    Original file (2001059195C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, revocation of his orders transferring him from the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) to the Retired Reserve; as an exception to regulation, granting a second waiver of the requirement to earn 50 retirement points during a retirement year to retain active Reserve status; and assigning him to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment (Reinforcement Training Unit – RTU), 1405 th Logistics Command, Unit Identification Code (UIC) Y64AAA, (1405 th RTU), in Monclova,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059775C070421

    Original file (2001059775C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he not be placed in the Retired Reserve and instead be reinstated in the Ready Reserve in order to complete 20 years of qualifying service. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant on 2 January 1981. The applicant provided a copy of AR-PERSCOM Orders C-03-108606, dated 27 March 2001, which shows that he was released from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079849C070215

    Original file (2002079849C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AR-PERSCOM informed him the he had been discharged effective 22 June 2001 and would not receive future VSI payments. AR-PERSCOM stated that Public Law and the implementing instructions of the Department of Defense (DOD) Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7A, Chapter 35, requires that individuals receiving VSI "must continue to serve in a Reserve Component for the entire period of eligibility for VSI" unless the member's "transfer is required by reason of failure of selection for...