| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Walter Avery, Jr. | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Report of Separation or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he sustained injuries while in combat in Vietnam and that the evidence he is submitting shows that he is entitled to the Purple Heart. He asserts that the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 3.102, which he furnishes with his request, states that if a reasonable doubt occurs in regard to a veteran’s claim, the claim should be resolved in favor of the veteran.
4. The Memorandum of Consideration reflecting the 10 November 1999 review of his case AR1999025657 is incorporated herein by reference as if wholly set forth. His previous requests for reconsideration were administratively closed on 26 October 2000 and 9 April 2001, due to an inability to locate any of the applicant’s military records.
5. The applicant submits a copy of General Orders Number 943, showing that he was awarded the ARCOM, and copies of DA Forms 1594, Daily Staff Journal or Duty Officer’s Logs. The daily logs cover the period 28 May 1968 to 25 April 1969. The applicant served in Vietnam from 28 April 1968 to 27 April 1969. The 71st Evacuation Hospital prepared the logs, which also contain entries referring to the unit the applicant was assigned to. There are numerous entries reporting that the compound was under enemy attack and taking casualties.
6. These documents were not previously available to the Board and constitute new evidence that requires Board review.
7. In a conversation with a member of the staff of the Board, the applicant, in effect, explained it was not unusual that accurate medical records were not kept. He was stationed with medical personnel and was treated like a member of the staff. They all knew each other. Since it was his commander (who was also a doctor) who took him to the hospital, he of course was treated and no record may have been made. He explained that the staff journal logs do not mention him by name, but do show that the compound on which his unit was stationed was under regular attack resulting in constant injuries. He states he would not request the Purple Heart award if he did not deserve it. He is also curious as to how the Board could not take the word of his commanding officer.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that one bronze service star is authorized for the Vietnam Service Medal for each campaign when assigned for duty with a unit during the period in which it participated in combat, or was under order to such unit in a combat zone. The applicant was assigned during the period in which four campaigns took place.
9. The same regulation provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 19 March 1974, all units assigned to Vietnam between 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence available indicates that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM, earned four bronze service stars to his Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. He is therefore, entitled to have these awards shown on his DD Form 214.
2. The CFR 3.102 referred to by the applicant applies to Department of Veterans Affairs claims and is not applicable to the actions of this Board.
3. The staff journal logs reflect that the compound where the applicant was stationed was regularly under attack and that casualties were suffered. Unfortunately, the staff journal logs do not mention the applicant by name and do not provide any information specific to his alleged injury.
4. The overall merits of the case, including the latest arguments by the applicant are insufficient as a basis for the Board to reverse or amend its previous decision concerning the Purple Heart.
5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below would correct an error and rectify an injustice.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. 2. That so much of the application as in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
___fne___ ___bje___ ___kyf__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__________Fred N. Eichorn__________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001059118 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011108 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | GD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074958C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant indicated in a 17 December 1968 request for reassignment that he had received one Purple Heart for wounds received in combat operations. That the applicant's DD Form 214 be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal and two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058715C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: NOTE: The Army Review Boards Agency, Support Division, will be directed to administratively correct the applicant’s records by amending his DD Form 214 to add the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal 1 st oak leaf cluster, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075371C070403
There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records to show he was wounded in action. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart. A review of the historical files of the unit's Daily Staff Journal for the two dates mentioned by the applicant failed to show the unit came under artillery or mortar attack on those dates.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065075C070421
The applicant states that he was wounded on 5 October 1969 in Vietnam by an enemy rocket that exploded in his room. He received an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for Heroism in relation to the event for refusing to leave his wounded fellow soldier until he got medical attention in spite of rockets impacting the area. The Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the 125 th Aviation Company, to which the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057002C070420
Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was authorized awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with palm during the period (18 months) in which the applicant was assigned to the 117 th Aviation Company. Although these awards were authorized subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, the Board concluded, in the interest of equity, that the applicant’s record should be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013168
His records contain no evidence showing he was wounded in action in Vietnam or that he was treated for any such wounds. After carefully examining the applicants record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the AGCM (1st Award) for his service from 3 August 1967 through 30 March 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011133
The applicant states: * he was awarded the Purple Heart while he was in the hospital in Japan, but it is not shown on his DD Form 214 * the Combat Infantryman Badge was not awarded to him or noted on his DD Form 214, but he served in combat in the A S?u Valley, Vietnam * he was in a combat infantry unit in Vietnam 3. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019903
He is requesting award of the Combat Infantryman Badge based on his combat service in Vietnam as an Infantryman. The evidence of record shows the applicant held an infantry MOS and he was assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge effective 13 November 1970, and b. adding to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 August 1973...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050009305
DA Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, Company D, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 9 August 1965 through 19 May 1969, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 59, dated 1969 and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017266
The applicant states, in effect: * the FSM was wounded in his left knee by shrapnel during an ambush while serving in Vietnam * the ambush occurred outside Landing Zone (LZ) West near Hiep Duc, Vietnam * the FSM was serving in Company A, 4th Battalion, 31st Infantry Regiment, 196th Infantry Brigade, 23rd Infantry Division * the day he was wounded was very chaotic; he was told by a medic he would be receiving a Purple Heart for his wound * the medic never submitted the FSM for the Purple...