| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas B. Redfern III | Member | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge. The applicant states he was told he had to serve 3 years in Germany, however, that was not the agreement, he wanted to serve in Vietnam.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted on 25 February 1963 and reenlisted on 1 July 1964. The applicant's initial enlistment contract does not indicate that he enlisted under a specific enlistment option, and his 1964 reenlistment contract indicates he enlisted for the Army Service School, subject to availability.
During March 1965 the applicant received two nonjudicial punishments, under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for giving his DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record) to a German National on 17 February 1965, and for consuming alcoholic beverages within a military barrack on
26 March 1965. His punishment's were reduction to pay grade E-2 and extra duty.
On 30 March 1965, a psychiatric evaluation cleared the applicant for any appropriate administrative action, including separation.
On 8 April 1965, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial for breaking restriction. He was sentenced to a forfeiture and additional restriction.
On 16 April 1965, the applicant's commander recommended that he be eliminated for the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness, with the issuance of an undesirable discharge certificate. The applicant's commander stated that his conduct and efficiency was unsatisfactory, that he had been a constant disciplinary problem, that he only does a satisfactory job under constant supervision and gives the NCO in charge a hard time especially when there are two or three others involved in the same detail, that he would constantly bicker among the other men performing the detail until there was confusion and disorder.
The applicant authenticated a statement with his initials and signature in which he declined legal counsel, waived his right to a hearing by a board of officers, elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf, and stated that he understood the ramifications of receiving an undesirable discharge.
On 3 May 1965, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, reduced him to the pay grade of E-1, and directed the issuance of an undesirable discharge certificate.
On 25 May 1965, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of the above cited regulation, under conditions other that honorable. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) indicates he had 10 months and 25 days of creditable service.
Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for unfitness. Separation action was to be taken when the commander determined that the best interest of the service would be served by eliminating the individual concerned and reasonable attempts to rehabilitate or develop the individual to be a satisfactory soldier were unlikely to succeed; or rehabilitation was impracticable. Unfitness included frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military or civil authorities and an established pattern of shirking. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate; however, in unusual circumstances, a general or honorable discharge was authorized, as directed by the convening authority.
The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character or the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 25 May 1965, the date of the applicant's discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 25 May 1968.
The application is dated 13 June 2001 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JNS __ __TBR __ __LE____ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2001058917 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011220 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 142.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091392C070212
This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant declined counsel, waived his right to a hearing before a board of officers, declined to submit statements in his own behalf, and acknowledged that he understood the effects of an undesirable discharge. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016772
On 12 June 1957, the applicants commander initiated separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. The commander stated that the applicant had received three NJP, two courts-martial, and was under arrest in quarters pending action by the convening authority on his last conviction. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for unfitness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010827
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 27 December 1965 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and his service was characterized as under conditions other than honorable. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant contends his undesirable discharge should be upgraded because he had a prior period of honorable active duty service that included...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010099C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) affirm the upgrade of his discharge to under honorable conditions under the Department of Defense (DOD) Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP). The examiner recommended the applicant receive an administrative discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 (Personnel Separations, Discharge, Unsuitability). On 30 June 1977, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) upgraded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011642
This form shows his company commander requested the applicant be evaluated for separation from military service in accordance with (IAW) Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations-Discharge Unfitness). His commander stated: a. The applicant stated that he "wants out of the Army" because he cannot get along with anyone.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008805C070206
On 14 April 1965, the applicant’s commander submitted a request to separate the applicant for unfitness. The applicant stated that if he were returned to duty he would go AWOL again. In the interviews the applicant had with his commander and the chaplain, the applicant stated that he wanted to go home to his mother.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005226C070208
On 12 July 1965, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Records show that the applicant was 18 years old at the time of his discharge and there is no evidence that indicates that he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711423
If he did not agree with the type of discharge, he could request review by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), the request to be received by that board within 15 years of the effective date of his discharge. On 11 July 1962, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015550
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019661
The applicant's record shows he was born on 25 January 1945 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 August 1963 at the age of 18 years and 7 months. On 13 January 1966, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, with an undesirable discharge. The applicant provided his birth certificate showing he was born in April 1947, which indicates at the time he enlisted in the RA he was 16 years and 4 months of age.