| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. Lawrence Foster | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge.
2. The applicant states that when he was thrown out of the Army he was depressed and just wanted to go home. He was having family problems, his wife had just given birth to a new baby, and he had been in Germany for 13 months and just wanted out of the Army. He feels he made a mistake and has been justly punished for the offense and feels his post service conduct merits a change.
3. The applicant provides three character references in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice which occurred on
12 March 1965. The application submitted in this case is dated 15 May 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant originally enlisted in the Alabama Army National Guard on
5 February 1960 for a period of 3 years. On 1 March 1962 he was discharged from the Army National Guard and immediately enlisted in the Regular Army on
2 March 1962, for a period of 6 years.
4. Between November 1963 and January 1965 he accepted 7 nonjudicial punishments, under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for being absent without leave (AWOL), missing bed check, failure to repair, being disrespectful to a commissioned officer, breaking restriction, and for being absent from his place of duty. His punishments included restriction, extra duty, forfeitures, reductions, and an oral reprimand.
5. On 25 January 1965, his commander recommended that he be separated from military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness.
6. On 26 January 1965, a Medical Officer’s Report determined that the applicant had no disqualifying mental or physical defects sufficient to warrant disposition through medical channels. He was found to be mentally responsible, able to distinguish right from wrong and to adhere to the right, and had the mental capacity to understand and participate in board proceedings.
7. On 8 February 1965, his company commander recommended that he be discharged from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness. He stated that the applicant had been a constant deterrant to the morale and discipline of all personnel who came in contact with him, and that he had complete disregard for rank or position. All efforts to make a soldier of him were futile, and he refused to conform to the requirements of the service.
8. On 9 February 1965, after consulting with counsel, the applicant acknowledged that he was aware of his rights and that he could be issued an undesirable discharge certificate. He waived a hearing before a board of officers, waived his right to counsel, and declined to submit a statement in his own behalf.
9. On 15 February 1965, the applicant was barred from reenlisting.
10. On 18 February 1965, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness, and directed his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade and the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
11. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for unfitness. Separation action was to be taken when the commander determined that the best interest of the service would be served by eliminating the individual concerned and reasonable attempts to rehabilitate or develop the individual to be a satisfactory soldier were unlikely to succeed; or rehabilitation was impracticable. Unfitness included frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military or civil authorities and an established pattern of shirking. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
12. Letters of support submitted on behalf of the applicant attest to his being a hard worker who always supports his family, and one who is well liked by family and friends in the community.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
2. The applicant declined counsel, waived his right to a hearing before a board of officers, declined to submit statements in his own behalf, and acknowledged that he understood the effects of an undesirable discharge.
3. While the Board has taken cognizance of the applicant's good post-service conduct, and his acknowledgement that he made a mistake, these factors do not warrant the relief requested.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 12 March 1965; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
11 March 1968. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RVO__ __MVT __ __LF ___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091392 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040224 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002969
The applicant requests the discharge of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be upgraded from under other than honorable conditions to an honorable discharge. Contrary to the applicant's contention that the FSM was deeply affected emotionally and spiritually and came back with drug abuse, the evidence of records shows his separation was based on his unfitness and resistance to adjust to military authorities. Based on his misconduct and record of indiscipline, the FSM's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021019
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD) to an honorable discharge. Accordingly, he was discharged on 29 April 1965 in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 with a UD. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013857
On 7 September 1965, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the relief requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013857
On 7 September 1965, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the relief requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711423
If he did not agree with the type of discharge, he could request review by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), the request to be received by that board within 15 years of the effective date of his discharge. On 11 July 1962, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074112C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 13 April 1962, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. The applicant’s good service during his first enlistment was recognized with an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000884
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions. A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 12 April 1965, shows he was charged with being AWOL from 3 to 8 April 1965. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076587C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board reviewed the applicant's record of service which included four nonjudicial punishments, one special court-martial conviction, one summary court-martial conviction and 38 days lost.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084250C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board convened on 24 April 1957 and after hearing testimony from the applicant, whereas he stated that he wanted out of the Army, the board of officers found that he was unfit for further service and recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness. The applicant's commander submitted a recommendation to discharge him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064447C070421
On 26 February 1965, the applicant was discharged in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness with a discharge UOTHC. However, at the time of the discharge a discharge UOTHC was normally considered appropriate. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsCASE IDAR2001064447SUFFIXRECONYYYYMMDDDATE BOARDED2002/06/11TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UOTHC)DATE OF DISCHARGE1965/02/26DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-208 .