| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, DD Form 4/1, be corrected to show he enlisted in pay grade E-4. He makes no additional statement.
3. The applicant’s military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
4. The applicant apparently enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve around February 1997. He was promoted to specialist, E-4 on 2 August 1998. He requested a conditional waiver to enlist in the Regular Army on 20 October 2000. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 May 2001 in pay grade E-3.
5. Army Regulation 601-210 prescribes eligibility criteria governing the enlistment of persons, with or without prior service, into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve. In pertinent paragraph, it states that when an applicant was last separated from any Component or is a current member of a Reserve Component in the grade of E-4 with not more than 5 years Active Federal Service and enlists within 24 months from the date of separation, the enlistment grade will be Specialist, E-4.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was eligible to enlist in the Regular Army on 22 May 2001 in pay grade E-4.
2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the applicant’s DD Form 4/3 dated 22 May 2001 be corrected to show he enlisted in pay grade E-4 and that he be paid any and all pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.
BOARD VOTE:
__fne___ __slp___ __dph___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001058834 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010717 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 112.02 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087857C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: The evidence of record shows that, on 5 February 1999, the applicant enlisted in the PAARNG and as a Reserve of the Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s rank should be SPC/E-4 and his date of rank should be 16 April 2002.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067494C070402
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he enlisted in the rank and grade of Specialist (SPC), E-4 on 14 March 2001 with all due back pay and an $8,000 enlistment bonus. A Regular Army soldier who lacks documentation required for advance promotion at the time of enlistment may submit supporting documents to his personnel officer within 6 months of his enlistment. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053334C070420
Having served 10 months and 13 days, the applicant was discharged for the purpose of accepting a commission in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 9 July 1970. On 20 February 2001, the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) denied the applicant advancement to CPT on the retired list because he did not serve as a captain while on active duty. Title 10, United States Code, section 3964, provides, in pertinent part, that enlisted personnel who retired with less than 30 years of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059251C070421
On 26 August 2000, the JROTC PMS provided the necessary documentation to advance her pay grade to E-3, effective upon enlistment. Documents must be presented within 1 year from the date of enlistment and entitlement to the higher grade must have existed at the time of enlistment. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant presented the required documentation within the required time limit and her records should be corrected accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067530C070402
The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay upon reaching age 60 and that she be paid the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. The applicant states that she is sure the FSM did not apply for his retirement benefits at age 60 because he was waiting until he actually retired at age 65. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088776C070403
The advanced individual training completion date is not the effective date of the accelerated promotion to E-5. Considering the commander's recommendation, the Board concludes that it would be equitable to adjust the applicant's E-5 date of rank and effective date to 16 March 2002. a. showing that the applicant was recommended for accelerated promotion to E-5 to be effective 16 March 2002 and that the promotion recommendation was processed in a timely manner; and
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068560C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW3 by a special selection board (SSB) under 2001 criteria. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064522C070421
The opinion also states that the applicant was enlisted in pay grade E-3 on 21 May 2001 in error and should have entered on active duty in the rank of SPC based on Table 7-1 of Army Regulation 601-210. It states, in pertinent part, that personnel who enlist the ACASP in MOS 91C will be enlisted in the pay grade of E-4 with subsequent promotion to the pay grade of E-5 provided they meet the established requirements of the regulation. In accordance with Chapter 7 of Army Regulation 601-210,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060668C070421
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant completed a total of 2 years, 11 months, and 22 days of honorable active military service at the time of his separation on 1 June 1977, which more than satisfies this regulatory qualifying period of service criteria. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064409C070421
A promotion memorandum dated 14 January 2000 was issued to him showing 3 January 2000 his date of rank and promotion effective date for major. Notwithstanding the delay, the effective date of promotion shall remain as 3 January 2000, the date the President approved the board, and the applicant is not further entitled to additional pay and allowances for the date of rank adjustment. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual...