| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Mr. George D. Paxson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Member | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his DD From 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal and the Army Commendation Medal. In support of his request the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, his Army Commendation Medal Certificate, two certificates of appreciation and a copy of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserves.
3. The applicant states that he received the Good Conduct Medal, but has never received the certificate, and that he has received the Army Commendation Medal and the certificate. However, neither of these awards have been added to his DD Form 214.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 May 1970 for a period of 2 years. He successfully completed basic training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina and advanced individual training at Fort Gordon, Georgia. He served in Vietnam from November 1970 to November 1971.
5. The applicant's certificate for award of the Army Commendation Medal covers the period 28 November 1970 to 15 November 1971, the dates of his Vietnam service. There are, however, no orders confirming the award in the applicant’s file. The award certificate was issued on 25 November 1971, after the applicant’s separation from active duty, and is authenticated by Secretary of the Army Robert Froehike, who was Secretary of the Army during the period in question.
6. The applicant was separated on 19 November 1971, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, overseas returnee. There is no evidence of any misconduct. His DD Form 214 indicates he had 1 year, 6 months and 7 days of creditable service.
7. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, stated that the Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Good Conduct Medal, nor any evidence which would serve as a basis to disqualify him from the award.
8. Army Regulation 672-5-1 also provided that the Army Commendation Medal was awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders was required.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes that there are no orders in the applicant's available records awarding him the Army Commendation Medal, however, his award certificate is signed by the appropriate Secretary of the Army, and the period of service covered by the award coincides with the applicant's dates of service in Vietnam. The fact that the certificate was issued after the applicant’s separation from active duty could explain the absence of the award on his separation document. In the absence of orders, or evidence to the contrary, the Board accepts the applicant’s award certificate as authentication of entitlement to the Army Commendation Medal and in the interest of justice concludes it would be appropriate to add the award to his separation document.
2. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Good Conduct Medal, or that he had any misconduct which would serve as a basis to deny the award. As such, in the interest of justice and equity, the applicant should be awarded the Good Conduct Medal for the period 13 May 1970 to 19 November 1971.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 13 May 1970 to 19 November 1971, and to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, for the period 28 November 1970 to 15 November 1971.
BOARD VOTE:
__GDP__ __WTM__ __RTD__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___George D. Paxson __
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001058564 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020124 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051564C070420
There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders in the applicant’s records which show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. Therefore, as an exception to regulation, the applicant is entitled to award of the Army Commendation Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060407C070421
Paragraph 3-13 outlines the criteria for the award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and it states, in pertinent part, that the award is authorized in time of war for heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service. In addition, given that the record is void of any derogatory information or a specific unit commander’s disqualifying recommendation for award of the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant is entitled to the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076245C070215
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant entered active duty on 29 May 1969. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 28 May 1971.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009919C070208
There are no orders in the applicant’s records awarding him the Air Medal. Evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of: a. the Air Medal; b. the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, for the period 21 June 1968 to 18 June 1971; c. the Meritorious Unit Commendation with First Oak Leaf Cluster; d. the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062333C070421
The applicant states, in a five page letter submitted with his application through his senator, that because he left the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) without having his company records being reviewed, he may be entitled to the Bronze Star, the Air Medal and the Purple Heart as well as other awards or medals. The available records do not show that the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063115C070421
Evidence of record shows the applicant was wounded in action on 17 March 1970 in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073085C070403
Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The Board is of the opinion that the applicant wasn't awarded the Good Conduct Medal because of an administrative oversight. e. adding the PH, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077828C070215
There is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was recommended for, awarded, or otherwise qualified for award of the Air Medal. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of three bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076718C070215
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the second award of the Air Medal based on his participation in 197 hours of combat air assaults, award of the Army Commendation Medal, an award of the Bronze Star Medal for valor, and award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Good Conduct Medal as an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002714
Furthermore, item 28 (Record of Assignment) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received an excellent conduct and efficiency rating throughout his enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...