| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | Analyst |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Purple Heart (PH) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) be added to his separation document.
3. The applicant states that since he earned these awards, he is entitled to have them listed on his separation document.
4. In support of his request he submits a copy of the award certificate for his ARCOM which shows that he served in Vietnam from 1 August 1969 to 1 August 1970.
5. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted and entered on active duty on 19 March 1969 at the New York City Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station.
6. He accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, UCMJ, on 7 July 1969 for being absent without leave (AWOL) for 4-days. He was awarded the military occupational specialty of an infantryman and was promoted to pay grade E-4.
7. He served in Vietnam from 22 August 1969 to 21 August 1970. On 4 May 1970, General Orders Number 4433 were published awarding the applicant the PH. The second digit of the applicant’s Social Security Account Number (SSAN) on those orders incorrectly shows “1” when it should have shown “7.”
8. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 22 March 1971. The separation document he was issued shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device, and the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star. The applicant's DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, does not contain an entry of nonfavorable consideration for the Good Conduct Medal.
9. In the processing of this case the applicant’s unit’s historical files were reviewed. There were no General Orders in those files which awarded the applicant the ARCOM.
10. Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. A record of punishment is not automatically disqualifying. However, at that time, a single efficiency rating of less than excellent was disqualifying. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. At that time, nonfavorable consideration was normally noted on the DA Form 20.
12. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, shows the pertinent identified campaign periods, for which a bronze service star is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal. Those periods are: Counteroffensive, Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 (9 June through 31 October 1969); Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 through 30 April 1970); DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive (1 May through 30 June 1970); and Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 through 30 June 1971).
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was awarded the PH and that decoration should be added to his separation document. In addition, the SSAN on the PH order should be corrected for historical purposes.
2. Absent orders to verify the authenticity of the photocopied ARCOM certificate, there is insufficient evidence in which to base the addition of an ARCOM to the applicant’s separation document.
3. The applicant is also entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
4. Also, the applicant served in Vietnam during four designated campaigns. As such, he should have been awarded four bronze service stars to his Vietnam Service Medal, not one.
5. The Board also considered whether the applicant should have been awarded the Good Conduct Medal. In that regard, while he accepted NJP for being AWOL, after that punishment he was promoted three pay grades and served a complete tour in Vietnam as an infantryman, which resulted in his being wounded in action. The Board is of the opinion that the applicant wasn't awarded the Good Conduct Medal because of an administrative oversight. The lack of a disqualification for the Good Conduct Medal entered on his DA Form 20 supports this conclusion.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. correcting the SSAN of General Orders 4433 dated 4 May 1970, Headquarters, Americal Division, from reading in the first three digits "012" to "072;"
b. awarding him the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm;
c. awarding him four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal;
d. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 March 1969 to 22 March 1971; and
e. adding the PH, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal, to his separation document.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__mhm__ ____rjw_ ____clg__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_________Melvin H. Meyer__________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002073085 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020204 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071451C070402
Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. There is nothing in the applicant’s military records which shows that he was wounded. Since nonfavorable consideration for the Good Conduct Medal was not noted on the applicant's DA Form 20, the Board will accept that the applicant was not awarded the Good Conduct Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065951C070421
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his correct social security account number (SSAN) and that he was awarded a Purple Heart (PH). He also requests that his PH Certificate be corrected to show his correct SSAN and middle initial. This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084411C070212
The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted and entered on active duty on 27 March 1968. The applicant’s military records show that he was rapidly promoted, there is no evidence of any adverse action being taken or considered against him, and there is no disqualification for the Good Conduct Medal contained in his DA Form 20. While not requested by the applicant, the Board also considered whether he should have been awarded the Good Conduct Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011592
Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009559
His separation document shows that he was awarded the PH, but does not show that he was awarded the AGCM, the BSM, or the ARCOM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was awarded the AGCM for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077982C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states he was wounded in action and was awarded the PH. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073827C070403
Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. While neither the applicant’s military records nor the historical files of his command contain any evidence that the applicant was awarded the BSM, the BSM Certificate submitted by the applicant along with the fact that the NPRC issued the applicant the BSM is convincing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011069
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Civil Action Honor Medal, and Overseas Service Bars. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his unit commander for award of the AGCM. The Board determined that there was insufficient documentation in which to show the individual concerned is entitled to the Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016615
This publication shows that the 101st Airborne Division Artillery and the 377th Artillery, during the time of the applicant's assignment, were respectfully cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, dated in 1970; and in DAGO Number 48, dated in 1971; for awards of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Records show that the applicant participated in seven campaign periods during his service in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000525C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart (PH), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the award of the Purple Heart for...