| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was drafted and he did not understand why we were at war. He understands that leaving his unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status was wrong. Now he is disabled and he needs help from his government.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 14 April 1971. He was assigned to Fort Dix, New Jersey for basic training. Following basic training, he was transferred to Fort Polk, Louisiana for advanced individual training with a reporting date of 2 July 1971. He did not report to Fort Polk and was placed in an AWOL status on 2 July 1971. He remained AWOL until 28 May 1973 when he was returned to military control and assigned to the Personnel Control Facility, Fort Dix.
On 11 June 1973, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 2 July 1971-28 May 1973. On 12 June 1973, the applicant underwent a physical examination that determined that he was physically fit for separation. On 14 June 1973, he consulted with legal counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. He was advised that he could receive a UD. He acknowledged that he understood the ramifications of receiving a UD. He did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 20 July 1973, the applicant’s unit commander recommended that his request for discharge be approved with a UD. On an unknown date, the separation authority approved separation with a UD.
On 27 August 1973, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a UD. He had completed 5 months and 17 days of active military service. He also had 652 days of lost time prior to his expiration term of service (ETS) date due to being AWOL and 45 days of lost time subsequent to his ETS date.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges
have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of a UD.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress. The type of discharge directed and the reason for discharge were appropriate considering the facts of the case.
3. The Board sympathizes with the applicant in that he is disabled; however, the applicant's extensive period of AWOL was inconsistent with the Army’s standards for acceptable personal conduct and does not warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__INW___ __SK___ __KAH__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001058209 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011115 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19730827 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A71.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.7100 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071810C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. The commanding general approved his request on 3 August 1973 and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075305C070403
Upon successful completion of the alternate service, former members would be granted a “clemency” discharge by the President of the United States, thus restoring his or her affected civil rights. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: After considering his overall record of service with regard to the Presidential Proclamation 4313 program, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057282C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 29 May 1971, he departed this unit in an AWOL status and remained absent until 7 July 1971 when he was returned to military control at Fort Polk, Louisiana. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051384C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 29 May 1971, he departed this unit in an AWOL status and remained absent until 7 July 1971 when he was returned to military control at Fort Polk, Louisiana. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086229C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074844C070403
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 13 May 1974, the applicant was discharged accordingly. In December 1970, long before the applicant was returned to military control after being found by the FBI in 1974, the unit commander from his unit in the RVN sent a letter to his mother informing her of his AWOL status.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707495C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general/under honorable conditions discharge (GD). The evidence of record and the independent evidence submitted by the applicant does not support the applicants contention that he was erroneously charged with AWOL periods. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015346
On 21 October 1974, at age 19, he entered active duty and he was assigned to 5th Battalion, 3rd Brigade, Fort Polk, LA, effective 12 November 1974. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charges against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or a dishonorable discharge. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003672C070205
David Tucker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must indicate that they are submitting the request of their own free will, without coercion from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709944
His second period of AWOL began on 20 November 1971 and ended on 5 January 1972. On 11 June 1979 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade to his discharge.Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the...