| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | Analyst |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Chairperson | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member | |
| Mr. Frank C. Jones II | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under conditions other than honorable be upgraded to honorable or general.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was led to believe that he could have his discharge upgraded after six months. They could not find his medical records so he gave up trying to get his discharge upgraded until now. He was having racial problems with his brothers and sisters at home and he believed that he was needed there. He has various medical problems and needs medical attention. The medical service he is now receiving is not the same nor as good as the military medical service. He needs his discharge upgraded in order to get better care.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted for three years on 19 August 1970, completed basic combat training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and in December 1970 was assigned to an infantry brigade at Fort Polk, Louisiana for advanced infantry training. On 11 January 1971 the applicant went AWOL. He returned to military control on 14 January 1971. On 14 March 1971 he was hospitalized at the Army Medical Detachment, Naval Hospital, St. Albans, New York from a deserter status. On 24 March 1971 he went AWOL. He was apprehended by civil authorities and retuned to military control at Fort Dix on 16 June 1971.
On 21 June 1971 the commanding officer of the Personnel Control Facility (PCF) at Fort Dix transmitted court-martial charges against the applicant, recommending trial by special court-martial. Those charges showed that the applicant was AWOL from 11 January 1971 to 14 March 1971, and from 24 March 1971 to 16 June 1971.
A Request for Absentee Records (AGPERSCEN Form 85) indicates that the applicant was absent from the Personnel Control Facility at Fort Dix from 1 July 1972 until his return to military control on 13 May 1974.
Charge sheets were prepared against the applicant for his various periods of AWOL, and the commanding officer of Company A, PCF at Fort Dix transmitted court-martial charges against him to the commander of the PCF on 22 May 1974. There is, however, no indication that the charges were preferred against the applicant.
The applicant was discharged on 29 January 1975 under conditions other than honorable under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. He had 1 year, 5 months, and 13 days of service, and 1092 days of lost time.
There is no record of the applicant's discharge proceedings. Orders issued by Fort Dix on 27 January 1975 show that he was discharged under the provisions of the above-cited authority.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
The maximum punishment for AWOL for more than 60 days authorized by the Manual for Courts-Marital is confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The applicant has not provided evidence to the contrary. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record. In view of the applicant's record of AWOL, the applicant's undesirable discharge is not considered overly harsh. Had he elected trial by court-martial he could have received a dishonorable discharge and confinement at hard labor.
2. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__TSK __ __WDP _ ___FCJ _ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003086229 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030812 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061208C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, AR 635-200. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020034
SM claims he decided he was never going to return. In fact, in his interview with PCF officials immediately following his return to military control, he stated he had been unhappy with the Army since basic training, and he had no intent to return following his absence to attend his grandmother's funeral. Regardless, after 108 days of lost time due to his AWOL status, he was returned to military control to face court-martial charges.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020458
The applicant states: a. On 18 June 1981, the applicant was discharged accordingly. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008845
When he requested a discharge for the good of the service on 15 November 1971 he also requested a physical and mental examination. His counsel informed him that he would receive a complete medical examination prior to the completion and approval of his discharge. With respect to the correction of his records to show he received a medical discharge, although he may have suffered from back pain due to scoliosis and received an examination that stated he was not qualified for heavy work at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006411
Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Dix, Fort Dix, NJ, Special Court-Martial Order Number 79, dated 2 November 1978, shows that, after completion of all required post-trial and appellate reviews, the convening authority ordered the applicants bad conduct discharge executed. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged in accordance with chapter 3 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) as a result of court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014292
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008179
On 27 April 1972, he was reported as AWOL from his assigned unit and on 8 May 1972, he was DFR as a deserter. However, his record contains Special Orders Number 168, dated 28 August 1972, issued by the PCF, Fort George G. Meade, assigning him to the Separation Transfer Point for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. In addition, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 29 August 1972 under the provisions of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001234
The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge under conditions other than honorable to an honorable or general discharge. After consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. However, there is no evidence in his record and he has provided no evidence showing the 298 days of time lost recorded on his DD Form 214 is incorrect.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062564C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Although the documentation is not in the available records, evidence shows that after the commander preferred charges for AWOL, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7 provides...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058344C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was in military confinement from 3 February-29 March 1971. On 1 April 1971, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 with a UD.