| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member | |
| Mr. Jose A. Martinez | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was told that he was signing for an undesirable discharge based on his inability to adapt to military life.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was inducted into the Army on 21 August 1969 and he successfully completed his training as a light weapons infantryman.
A review of the records show that the applicant went absent without leave (AWOL) on 20 January 1970 and he remained absent until 11 February 1970. The record is void of any punishment being imposed against him for this AWOL incident.
The applicant again went AWOL and charges were preferred against him on 15 April 1975 for being AWOL from 3 May 1971 until he returned to military control on 7 April 1975.
The applicant was notified that charges were pending against him for being AWOL and on 18 April 1975, after consulting with counsel, he submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. At the time that he submitted his request for discharge, he submitted a statement in his own behalf. In the statement he indicated that he went AWOL because his grandmother was ill and he was repeatedly being denied leave. He further stated that his grandmother passed away 5 months after he went AWOL and he thought about turning himself in; however, he had been, “messed around with so much” while he was in the Army that he chose not to turn himself into military authorities. He went on to state that he had personal property missing while he was in the Army that was never returned to him.
The appropriate authority approved the request for discharge on 22 April 1975. Accordingly, on 23 April 1975, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by
court-martial. He had completed 1 year, 8 months and 6 days of total active service and he had 1459 days of lost time due to AWOL. He was furnished an undesirable discharge.
There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
2. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefor were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
3. There is no evidence of record to support the applicant’s contention that he was told that he was being discharged because of his failure to adapt to military life. The records clearly show that after consulting with counsel, he submitted a request to be discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. At the time that he submitted his request for discharge he indicated that he understood the possible effects of an undesirable discharge. Although he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__mdm__ __jhl ____ ___jm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001058038 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2001/10/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1975/04/23 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | 689 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 708 | 144.7100 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075966C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was granted leave in the States from 9 November through 8 December 1974. On 19 October 1975, the applicant surrendered to military authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009236
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to a general or honorable discharge. His record shows his request to be discharged for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, was approved on or about 15 August 1975. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001309C071029
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in a statement dated 11 January 2007, that he enlisted and loved his training. Since he had been gone from Fort Meade for 48 days with evidently no further threats from those two Soldiers (at least he did not mention at the time or currently that he received any further threats), and since after he turned himself in he was sent to Fort Dix and not returned to Fort Meade, his statement now that he felt so threatened...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017039
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD) to a general discharge (GD). On 11 July 1975, he was charged with being AWOL and was pending a court-martial for being AWOL for a total of 203 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100004485
The DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service -in lieu of trial by court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 9 January 1991, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records denied his petition for an upgrade because he had not submitted his application...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002116
Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel and without coercion, he voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial on 22 October 1975 in the rank/grade of private/E-1 with a UD. On 28 February...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027239
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. The evidence of record shows the applicant had one special court-martial and received three punishments under Article 15 for being AWOL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing the applicant was separated from the service on 14 August 1973, with an Honorable Discharge, under the provisions of Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065840C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or medical discharge. He again went AWOL on 28 July 1975 and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities at Fort Hood on 22 August 1975, where charges were again preferred against him.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014019
The applicant requests his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 5 March 1976, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. On 6 April 1976, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016927
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. The applicant states he went absent without leave (AWOL) to seek medical treatment because he was told he was going to lose his leg.