Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058007C070420
Original file (2001058007C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 11 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001058007


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Lee Cates Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show he served the equivalent of a 2-year enlistment for pension purposes. He indicates that he served on initial active duty for training and was then ordered to active duty for missing meetings. He provides copies of his DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) dated 21 February 1975 and 13 December 1976.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's available military records show:

On 9 November 1973, he enlisted in the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) for 6 years.

On 7 February 1974, he was ordered to initial active duty for training. He completed his required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 26L (Tactical Microwave Systems Repairer). On 21 February 1975, he was honorably released from active duty to the FLARNG. His DD Form 214 indicates he had 1 year and 15 days of net active service this period, and 2 months and 28 days of prior inactive service.

On 12 February 1976, he was ordered to active duty for a period of 10 months and 20 days because of his failure to attend unit meetings.

During the period 10 March to 22 December 1976, he served in a unit in Germany. He was promoted to pay grade E-4 effective 9 August 1976.

On 13 December 1976, he was honorably released from active duty to the FLARNG. His DD Form 214 indicates he had 10 months and 2 days of net active service this period for a total of 1 year, 10 months and 17 days of active duty. It also indicates that he accepted a direct USAR assignment to the 489th Transportation Company (USAR), Jacksonville, Florida.

On 9 March 1977, he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

On 8 November 1979, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.


Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 13 December 1976, the date he was released from active duty. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 13 December 1979.

The application is dated 14 November 2000 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of the case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit the application within the three-year time limit.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_dph____ _cla____ _clg____ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION





Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001058007
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20010911
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


BOARD VOTE :

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




Carl W. S. Chun
Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001249C070205

    Original file (20060001249C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Department of the Army, Company C, 1st Battalion, 124th Infantry Regiment General Orders Number 97-007, dated 28 April 1997, show that the applicant received another reduction in pay grade to pay grade PFC/E-3 for inefficiency. On 8 October 1999, the applicant was discharged from the ARNG and the United States Army Reserve (USAR). Unless an absence is authorized, a Soldier failing to attend a scheduled drill will be charged with an unexcused absence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069801C070402

    Original file (2002069801C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his 11 January 2002 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve, however, he did not do so within the established suspense date he was given and thus was discharged.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056155C070420

    Original file (2001056155C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and that his records be corrected accordingly. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board; however, the evidence of record fails to show that during his assignment he performed the duties of an infantryman while assigned to an infantry unit or that he engaged in ground combat against...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070399C070402

    Original file (2002070399C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to major by the 1995 RCSB, which convened on 14 March 1995. The commander stated that the applicant was a member of the IRR, was selected for promotion to major with a PED of 20 August 1994, in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155, and should have received his promotion orders within 30 days.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050007670

    Original file (20050007670.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, restoration of his rank of specialist (SPC); that his Army National Guard (ARNG) Separation Document (NGB Form 22) be corrected to include the Army Good Conduct Medal and Army Achievement Medal and to reflect his correct military education. The evidence of record shows that the separation document issued to the applicant by the FLARNG properly reflects his rank as SPC, and it was also corrected to reflect the authority and reason for separation recommended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100672C070208

    Original file (04100672C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Major "D" stated that, according to his records, the applicant was paid for every drill that he attended. She also stated that the California Army National Guard needed to correct the orders transferring the applicant into the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) and show that he was transferred to the FLARNG, so that the applicant could be authorized back pay. There is insufficient evidence to show that he attended drills with the FLARNG during the periods requested or that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008732C080213

    Original file (20070008732C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070008732 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, his option selection letter is not available to confirm he had actually requested transfer to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064513C070421

    Original file (2001064513C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012800

    Original file (20080012800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731, provides that a member of the Active Reserves or National Guard is entitled, upon application, to retired pay if the person meets the following minimum requirements: be at least 60 years of age; have performed at least 20 years of qualifying service computed under section 12732, Title 10, U.S. Code; have performed the last 8 years of qualifying service while a member of the Active Reserve; and not be entitled, under any other provision of law, to retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004540C070206

    Original file (20050004540C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a letter dated 28 June 1981, the applicant's unit commander notified him that he was an unsatisfactory participant because he did not submit a request to be excused from MUTAs for the periods 22 to 23 November 1980, 24 to 25 January 1981 and 11 to 12 April 1981. The applicant was discharged from the USAR on 13 April 1983 by Department of the Army, Office of The Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center Orders D-04-900848 with an UOTHC discharge. The applicant...