Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057988C070420
Original file (2001057988C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 11 September 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057988


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Celia L. Adolphi Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH) and any other awards to which he is entitled be added to his separation document
(DD Form 214).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the PH by Department of the Army (DA) and would like it added to his separation document, along with any other awards to which he is entitled. In support of his application, he provides a copy of an Authorization for Issuance of Awards (DA Form 1577).

4. The applicant’s military records show that on 24 April 1967, he entered the Regular Army for 3 years. Upon his successfully completing basic training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty
94B (Cook) and assigned to Vietnam for his first permanent duty station.

5. On 16 September 1967, the applicant arrived in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 9th Infantry Division, United States Army Pacific (USARPAC).

6. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms, in block 40 (Wounds), that while serving as a private first class (PFC) in the RVN on
13 February 1968, he received a wound to the forehead between the eyes.

7. On 14 September 1969, the applicant completed his tour in the RVN and was reassigned to Fort Meade, Maryland, where he served until being honorably separated at the completion of his term of service on 23 April 1970. Upon his separation, he was issued a DD Form 214 that shows he completed a total of
3 years of active military service and held the rank of specialist/E-4 (SP4).

8. The separation document also shows that during his active duty tenure, the applicant earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device, 2 Overseas Bars, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Badge (M-14 Rifle). This document contains no reference to the applicant being wounded in action or being awarded the PH.

9. The record also includes a copy of a properly issued DA Form 1577, dated
1 September 1993, which was issued by the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St Louis, Missouri. This document confirms that DA authorized that the following awards be issued to the applicant: PH; NDSM; VSM, RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with 1960 Device, 2 Overseas Bars, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Badge with Rifle Bar.


10. The DA Form 1577 also included, as an enclosure, a letter that confirmed the applicant was also authorized the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with/Palm Unit Citation Badge.

11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military awards. Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member wounded or killed while engaged in action against an armed enemy or hostile force. A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent while engaged in action against the enemy. It also specifically states that in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official record.

12. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) provides guidance on determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. It confirms that the applicant’s unit, HHC, 9th Infantry Division, earned the following awards during his assignment tenure: RVNGC with Palm for the period 1 December 1966 through 30 June 1968, as authorized in DA General Order (DAGO) Number 31, issued in 1969; and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal (RVNCAHM) for the period 19 December 1965 through 28 June 1969, as authorized in DAGO 59, issued in 1969.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes and finds merit in the applicant’s contentions that the PH should be added to his separation document and in his request that all awards to which he is entitled be added to his records

2. By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. This treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a matter of official record.


3. The Board finds that the entry in block 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s
DA Form 20, which confirms he was wounded in action while serving as a PFC in the RVN on 13 February 1968, coupled with the DA authorization to issue him the PH, contained in the DA Form 1577, dated 1 September 1993, more than satisfies the regulatory burden of proof necessary to award him the PH. Thus, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.

4. In addition, the Board concludes that the applicant is entitled to have the following unit awards, to which he is entitled, based on assignment tenure and unit of assignment in the RVN, added to his records: RVNGC with Palm
Unit Citation and RVNCM with 1960 Device.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the PH, for being wounded in action while serving as a PFC in the RVN on 13 February 1968, the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, and RVNCM with 1960 Device.

BOARD VOTE:

__CLA___ __CLG __DPH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ___Celia L. Adolphi____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057688
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2001/09/11
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1970/04/23
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON ETS
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 46 107.0000
2. 61 107.0015
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015901

    Original file (20110015901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with “V” Device for heroism in the RVN on 9 May 1968 and this award was announced and authorized in GOs issued by the 199th Infantry Brigade, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020434

    Original file (20100020434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) by adding unit awards and campaign participation credit he is eligible for based on his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The evidence of record also confirms that during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, his unit was cited for award of the RVNCG with Palm Unit Citation for the period 7 September 1966 - 10 August 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013540

    Original file (20090013540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During the original review of the applicant's case, the Board determined that the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH had not been met because there was no evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action, or that he was treated for a combat related wound by military medical personnel. The DD Form 214 issued to him at that time shows, in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089378C070403

    Original file (2003089378C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 and orders on file in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) confirm that he attended and completed the NCO Combat Leader’s Course at Fort Benning, between 17 May and 13 August 1968. The evidence of record confirms that orders were issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011575C070208

    Original file (20040011575C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also claims his unit was awarded the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, and that he is entitled to the AGCM. However, there are no orders, flight records, or other evidence on file in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that confirms he is entitled to this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him Army Good Conduct Medal; by showing his entitlement to the Air Medal with Numeral...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020701

    Original file (20090020701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states the SSN in item 3 of his DD Form 214 is incorrect. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his REFRAD on 14 November 1968 lists the SSN he now claims is incorrect in item 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013097

    Original file (20110013097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021258

    Original file (20090021258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations Commendation and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 25 March 1970 to add all awards earned on active duty and in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Therefore, a second award of this award should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089062C070403

    Original file (2003089062C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, confirmation that the applicant was wounded in action and treated for this wound is provided by an entry on the official DA Vietnam Casualty Roster. Therefore, the Board finds the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support the award of the PH has been satisfied in this case, and it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH and to add this award to his record at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004174

    Original file (20090004174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for being wounded in action in the RVN on 28 March 1968 and to add the entry PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) to item 24 of his DD Form...