IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 February 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013540
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for award of the Purple Heart (PH).
2. The applicant states, in effect, he was wounded by the Viet Cong while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in May 1969. He also indicates that he was treated for shell fragment wounds to his right arm, right leg, and chest in Japan before being transferred to a hospital at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
3. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request: Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) letter, a unit history document extract, a DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition-Physical Profile Record), and a VA rating decision.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2008001880 on 29 January 2009.
2. The applicant submits a VA letter dated 27 August 2008 and unit history document extract, which confirm he was assigned to the 196th Infantry Brigade while serving in the RVN and that this unit participated in combat against an enemy force in the RVN. Additionally, he submits a DA Form 3349 (also on file in his record), which confirms he received medical treatment for metal fragment wounds to his right arm, right leg, and chest while hospitalized at Womack Army Hospital, Fort Bragg from 25 May to 26 June 1969.
3. During the original review of the applicant's case, the Board determined that the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH had not been met because there was no evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action, or that he was treated for a combat related wound by military medical personnel.
4. The applicants military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 31 January 1968. He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).
5. The applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 8 July 1968 to 12 May 1969 and he was assigned to Company B, 4th Battalion, 31st Infantry Regiment, 196th Infantry Brigade. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his tour in the RVN he was assigned to the Medical Holding Company, 249th General Hospital, Japan, in a patient status from 17 May 1969 through 24 May 1969, at which time he was reassigned to the Army Hospital at Fort Bragg in a patient status.
6. The applicants Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains Headquarters, 95th Evacuation Hospital General Orders Number 101, dated 13 May 1969, which awarded the applicant the PH for wounds received in action on 12 May 1969 while in the RVN. It also confirms the PH medal was not issued at that installation. The MPRJ also contains Headquarters, Americal Division Special Orders Number 296, dated 22 October 1968, which awarded the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB); and Americal Division General Orders Number 4940, dated 16 June 1969, which awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for his meritorious service in the RVN from July 1968 to July 1969.
7. On 30 January 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years of active duty service. The DD Form 214 issued to him at that time shows, in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), that he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars, RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device 1960, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy. Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN.
9. Table B-1 of the above awards regulation contains a list of campaigns and shows that during the applicants tenure of assignment in the RVN, participation credit was granted for the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V, Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI, and TET 69 Counteroffensive campaigns.
10. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated in 1974, authorized award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Palm Unit Citation to all units assigned to the RVN from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contention that he should be awarded the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN was carefully considered and found to have merit. The evidence of record confirms the applicant received and was treated for metal fragment wounds to his right arm, right leg, and chest while serving in the RVN, this led to his medical evacuation to Japan and ultimately to Fort Bragg. There are also orders available that were issued by the 95th Evacuation Hospital, which awarded him the PH for being wounded in action on 12 May 1969. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add the PH to his DD Form 214.
2. The applicant's record also contains orders issued by the Americal Division, which awarded the applicant the CIB and the ARCOM for his meritorious service in the RVN. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his DD Form 214.
3. The evidence of record also confirms that based on the applicants RVN service and campaign participation, he is eligible for the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation and 3 bronze service stars to be worn with his VSM. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his DD Form 214 at this time.
BOARD VOTE:
___X___ ___X____ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the ABCMRs decision in Docket Number AR20080018800 dated 29 January 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars and adding the Purple Heart, Army Commendation Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars; and by issuing a correction to the DD Form 214 that reflects these changes.
_______ _ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090013540
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090013540
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106655C070208
LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record in this case includes an entry in Item 40 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 that shows he received a fragmentation wound to the neck on 15 November 1969, while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart, for being...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002242
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and saw and participated in combat. He also states that he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for being wounded in action, but his unit never awarded him the CIB for his service in combat.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017976C070206
William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 18 December 1969, and as a result, he was awarded the PH by proper authority.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001655
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 2 May 1968 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000771
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's OMPF contains official orders showing he was awarded the BSM (2nd Award) with V Device and one PH for wounds he received in action on 10 February 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013043
Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2 November 1966 through 26 September 1968. The evidence also confirms that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, he is eligible for the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022615
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 31 (Foreign Service): * Germany from 17 February through 9 October 1969 * Vietnam from 12 October 1969 through 2 July 1970 * Korea from 17 December 1971 through 17 January 1973 * Item 38 (Record of Assignments), in part: * duty as a Troop Aidman with Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Calvary Regiment from 25 October 1969 to 23 June 1970 * assigned in a patient status to the Medical Holding Company, 249th...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021157
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) includes a Western Union Telefax and a U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) message number date time group (DTG) 140312Z MAY 69, stating: * he was slightly wounded by fragments while at an artillery firing position when the area came under attack by a hostile force * he received multiple wounds to both ankles and his left arm * he was treated and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005518
The applicant requests correction of his separation document to show two awards of the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and "Overseas Ribbon." Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023356
Accordingly, it would be appropriate to award him the PH for wounds received in action on 14 November 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. However, while the evidence of record corroborates the applicant being wounded in action in the RVN once, there is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence confirming a second wounding. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....