Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057529C070420
Original file (2001057529C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 15 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001057529


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Walter Avery Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Stanley Kelley Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, the acceptance of his current service in the US Army Reserve (USAR) in lieu of repayment of his Reserve Officers Corps (ROTC) debt of approximately $6,528.50.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his enlistment in the USAR should erase his ROTC debt by fulfilling his military obligation. He attended the University of Southern California (USC) because it was one of the top five ranked accounting programs. His goal in accepting the scholarship was to serve as a commissioned officer in the USAR. During the first semester in the ROTC scholarship program, he learned that the ROTC scholarship was not a reserve scholarship but one that would require active duty service. This negated the whole reason he was attending USC, which was to also become an accountant. He left the ROTC program after discussions with the Professor of Military Science.

4. In support of his requests, he submits a copy of his USAR leave and earning statement that reflects that $531.73 was deducted for payment to a government debt, another statement that shows his debt balance as $$6,400.00, a letter from a unit administrator, and a copy of his Bachelor of Science in Accounting diploma from USC. The letter from the applicant’s unit administrator attests that he is a member in good standing in the unit and that the unit supports his efforts to relieve himself from his past debt to the military. In addition, he also submits copies of documents that reflect that he was lauded for being the class leader and honor graduate of the Finance Specialist Course, Class 73C-027.

5. The applicant’s military records show that he was awarded a 2-year ROTC scholarship and enrolled in the 2-year ROTC program at the USC on 28 August 1997.

6. As part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC, an individual must sign a
DA Form 597-3, which is the agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet.  That form contains the promises made between the Army and the potential cadet, and includes the action the Army will take in the event a cadet fails to successfully complete the terms of the contract. The applicant acknowledged that he understood and agreed that disenrollment from the ROTC program during Military Science III could result in a call to active duty for a period of 3 years or a reimbursement obligation.

7. On 9 June 2000, the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a period of 8 years at pay grade E-4, with assignment to Headquarters, 395th Finance Battalion.






CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant argues that his enlistment in the USAR should be taken into consideration, and that the prospect of repaying a ROTC scholarship while serving in the USAR is unfair. The evidence available and information provided by the applicant indicates that the applicant was properly disenrolled from the ROTC, agreed to repay his scholarship, and without any prior agreement regarding debt relief, enlisted in the USAR. There is no error or injustice in that scenario.

2. Nonetheless, it is accepted that the applicant’s enlisted service in the USAR is equivalent to being called to active duty under the terms of his ROTC contract. Therefore, collection of his ROTC debt will be held in abeyance during the term of his service and will be remitted (with any monies already collected returned to him) provided he satisfactorily completes eight years of his enlistment.

3. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service obligated as a result of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION
:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:

         a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a USAR enlisted soldier;

         b. suspending collection of his ROTC debt during his enlistment with the debt to be remitted upon satisfactory completion of eight years of service;

c. returning to him any money already collected from him; and








         d. showing that if he fails to complete eight years of enlisted service obligated as a result of his amended ROTC scholarship contract either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis in accordance with paragraph 12 of this DA Form 597-3.

BOARD VOTE:

___sk __ _ ____inw __ ___kah GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____________Stanley Kelley__________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001057529
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20011115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION Grant
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069711C070402

    Original file (2002069711C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military records show, however, that on 31 August 1994, he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) for eight years as a Cadet and was assigned to the USAR Control Group (ROTC). a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a commissioned officer in the ARNG; d. showing that if he fails to complete the eight-year contractual military service obligation as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072636C070403

    Original file (2002072636C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the US Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 August 1999, under the ROTC scholarship Cadet Program with prior military service. It stated that the applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC Program on 9 November 2002, under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraph 3-43a(1). Public Law 92-453 authorizes the waiver of erroneous payments of pay and allowances to former members or civilian employees.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054571C070420

    Original file (2001054571C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC program, an individual must sign a DA Form 597-3, which is the agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. If it is determined that the cadet will be ordered to active duty, the cadet will not be discharged, and Headquarters, Cadet Command will issue active duty orders. Nonetheless, the Board accepts that the applicant’s enlisted service in the Regular Army is equivalent to being called to active duty under the terms of his ROTC contract.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064789C070421

    Original file (2001064789C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he was awarded a 3-year ROTC scholarship and enrolled in the ROTC program on 1 September 1991. If the applicant fails to complete four years of service in the USAR either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt will be recouped on a pro-rated basis. a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a commissioned officer in the USAR;

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059547C070421

    Original file (2001059547C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract, DA Form 597-3, paragraph 7d states that if he were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason or if he failed to accept a commission, the Secretary of the Army could order him to active duty as an enlisted soldier or, in lieu of being ordered to active duty, could require him to reimburse the United States through repayment of an amount of money, plus interest, equal to the entire amount of financial assistance paid by the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063286C070421

    Original file (2001063286C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 21 July 1997, the applicant signed an Addendum to Part I of his Scholarship Contractual Agreement which acknowledged that as a cadet at the New Mexico Military Institute, Fourth Region ROTC, he was in breach of his 2-year Army ROTC Scholarship Contract; that he understood the terms of his contract; and that he had been advised that he was being provided the opportunity to repay $3,000.00 that the United States had expended in support of his educational assistance in lieu of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059864C070421

    Original file (2001059864C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 30 October 1998, under the ROTC Scholarship Cadet Program. It stated that the applicant was disenrolled from ROTC under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraph 3-43a(15). The applicant acknowledged that she understood and agreed that if she was disenrolled from the ROTC program during Military Science II, she could be called to active duty for a period of two years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064912C070421

    Original file (2001064912C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An addendum was then added to his ROTC scholarship contract, which advised the applicant that his debt was $11,972, and presented him options for repayment. a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show, that as an exception to policy, he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a commissioned officer in the Air Force; d. showing that if he fails to complete three years of active duty service obligated as a result of his amended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067945C070402

    Original file (2002067945C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In lieu of repayment, the cadet could be ordered to active duty for not more than four years. Had the applicant not had a service or repayment obligation, based on the ROTC program requirements, he would have been entitled to all of the enlistment incentives he received including the $13,000 cash bonus. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by: a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005887

    Original file (20130005887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An ROTC Cadet Action Request was initiated by his PMS requesting a board of officers consider the applicant's disenrollment for breaching the terms of his ROTC contract based on absences and failure to enroll in Military Science classes in the 2010 Fall semester by failing to attend Advanced Camp and that he be required to repay his monetary scholarship benefits. The applicant's DA Form 5315-E (U.S. Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record), certified on 13 September 2010, shows...