Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059547C070421
Original file (2001059547C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 1 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059547


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Walter T. Morrison Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) debt be waived.

3. The applicant states that he completed his contract for the ROTC scholarship. He has applied for active duty and is currently attending the Officer Basic Course. He has been repaying the loan until this matter can be remedied.

4. The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) (ROTC Control Group) on 1 August 1995 and enrolled as an ROTC scholarship cadet effective 21 August 1995. His Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract, DA Form 597-3, paragraph 7d states that if he were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason or if he failed to accept a commission, the Secretary of the Army could order him to active duty as an enlisted soldier or, in lieu of being ordered to active duty, could require him to reimburse the United States through repayment of an amount of money, plus interest, equal to the entire amount of financial assistance paid by the United States for his advanced education.

5. Paragraphs 1f and 1g of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that the applicant understood he had to maintain a minimum cumulative academic grade point average (GPA) of 2.0 on a 4.0 or equivalent scale for each semester or quarter and at least a 3.0 on a 4.0 or equivalent scale, cumulative and semester or quarter, academic GPA in all ROTC courses. Paragraph 3 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states he understood that, upon completion of all requirements for appointment, to include medical qualification, all prescribed military science courses, Advanced Camp and any other required training, he would apply for and accept an appointment, if offered, as a commissioned officer in either the USAR or the Army National Guard. He would accept an appointment, if offered, and not resign such reserve appointment before completion of his 8-year contractual military service obligation. He would serve a short period of active duty or active duty training if appointed in a Reserve component. If he were not selected for extended active duty, he would complete an officer’s basic course for branch qualification. This would be followed by service in a Reserve Component unit which has monthly unit training assemblies and an annual training period of approximately two weeks until the remainder of his contractual military service obligation was served.

6. On 13 July 1996, the applicant passed ROTC Advanced Camp.

7. On 10 June 1997, the applicant was placed on a leave of absence. On 18 October 1999, he was notified that he was disenrolled from ROTC for failing to maintain the required minimum semester or quarter cumulative academic


GPA. On 28 October 1999, the applicant signed an addendum to his scholarship contractual agreement promising to make repayment of the total amount owed, $5,000.00, in monthly installments, plus interest.

8. The applicant applied for and was offered a direct appointment in the USAR. On 19 December 2000, he executed the oath of office appointing him a second lieutenant. He is currently assigned to a Troop Program Unit in the USAR.

CONCLUSIONS
:

1. There is no evidence of Government error or injustice in this case. The applicant was properly disenrolled from ROTC for not maintaining the required academic GPA and he agreed to repay the total amount due plus interest.

2. However, his 19 December 2000 appointment as a second lieutenant in the USAR serves the same purpose as his successful completion of ROTC would have done. The Army is still getting the benefits of his service. As a matter of equity it would be appropriate to consider his December 2000 appointment as a commissioned officer in the USAR to have met the military service obligation required by his ROTC scholarship contract. It would be appropriate to hold the collection of his ROTC debt in abeyance during his term of obligated service to be remitted (with any monies already collected returned to him) provided he satisfactorily completes the obligated term of his service.

3. If the applicant fails to complete the period of obligated service as outlined in the terms of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:

a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a USAR officer appointed by direct commission; and

b. suspending collection of his ROTC debt during his obligated service period with the debt to be remitted (and any monies already collected returned to him) upon satisfactory completion of his obligated term of service.

2. If the applicant fails to complete the period of service obligated as a result of his amended ROTC scholarship contract either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis in accordance with paragraph 7 of his DA Form 597-3.

BOARD VOTE:

__wtm___ __aao___ __clg___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           Walter T. Morrison
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059547
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011101
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013928

    Original file (20140013928.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows the applicant's disenrollment was due to a breach of the ROTC contract based on his failure to maintain a minimum semester academic GPA of 2.0 on a 4.0 scale and his indifferent attitude as evidenced by frequent absences from military training. However, there is no evidence of record and counsel provided no evidence that shows the applicant was erroneously disenrolled from the ROTC Program. Since it appears the applicant failed to maintain a GPA of 2.0 for each semester...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010440

    Original file (20100010440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 April 2008, the Professor of Military Science, U.S. Army ROTC Battalion, UND, recommended the applicant be disenrolled from the ND ROTC program because she had not been admitted into her upper division nursing program at Saint Mary's College. It stated that the applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC program under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraphs 3-43a(16). The applicant understood her academic standing and requirements of the nursing program throughout her time in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014073

    Original file (20130014073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract) * Disenrollment approval memorandum * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Account Statement * Account Summary by Term CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 6 (Enlisted Active Duty Service Obligation) of his DA Form 597-3 states that if he were called to active duty for a breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 5, he would be ordered to active duty for 2 years if the breach occurred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014572

    Original file (20130014572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * legal review memorandum of disenrollment proceedings * disenrollment approval memorandum * U.S. Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record * unsigned/undated Addendum to Scholarship Contractual Agreement * discharge orders * DA Form 785 (Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate – Type Training) * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Account Statement * disenrollment notification CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 13 March 2012, the Commanding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000526

    Original file (20100000526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was berated by the PMS, and was told to start going to class and to pull his grades up enough to pass. Counsel states that during Christmas break the applicant was given an ultimatum from his PMS that he had to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), go to all of his classes, and graduate on time or he would be disenrolled. The investigating officer told the applicant he was being disenrolled for cheating but there was never any opportunity for the applicant to hear the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018186

    Original file (20120018186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a DD Form 597-3, dated 31 August 2009, which states in: a. paragraph 3c(1) (Cadet Obligation), cadets understand and agree they will incur an active duty and/or reimbursement obligation after the first day of their military science II year (sophomore year) if they are a 3, 4, or 5 year scholarship recipient; and b. paragraph 5 (Terms of Disenrollment), he understood and agreed that once he became obligated and was disenrolled from the ROTC program for breach of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026488

    Original file (20100026488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. A letter from the applicant addressed to "To Whom It May Concern," dated 4 November 2009, shows the applicant requested disenrollment from the Army ROTC Program because she could not continue to pursue her nursing degree under her Army ROTC contract because she was not eligible for acceptance in the JMU nursing program. The applicant contends that her ROTC scholarship debt should be forgiven because she was not fully informed by the ROTC PMS or any ROTC cadre member of the requirement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015462

    Original file (20140015462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the documentation related to her disenrollment and breach of contract while in the Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Program, as well as remission of her ROTC debt in the amount of $8,372.50 2. The applicant provides: a. When she signed the ROTC Scholarship contract, she agreed that in the event she disenrolled from the ROTC program, she could either be ordered to repay her scholarship debt or be required to enter active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022193

    Original file (20120022193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 May 2010, her ROTC commander submitted a recommendation to the U.S. Army Cadet Command, that the applicant be disenrolled from the ROTC program and be required to repay her scholarships monies in the amount of $12,690.50. In a memorandum to the Commander, U.S. Army Cadet Command, dated 15 November 2011, the Assistant Secretary of the Army stated the applicant's appeal was reviewed, it was determined her debt was valid, and he directed she be ordered to repay educational expenses in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006005C070205

    Original file (20060006005C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Yolanda Maldonado | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that he enlisted after being disenrolled from ROTC and has served over 2 years on active duty. On 19 June 2003, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 6 years, in pay grade E-3, for an $18,000 cash enlistment bonus and training in Special Forces.