| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge so that he may enlist in the United States Army Reserve.
APPLICANT STATES: In essence, that he married at a very young age and that he had little experience in dealing with marital problems. Serving in the military and handling personal problems was mentally stressful. Both he and his wife had mental breakdowns and his marriage ended in a divorce. He believes that he may have been a better soldier if he had received marriage counseling from the Army.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 21 June 1979. On 26 June 1979, he extended his enlistment for a period of 1 year to meet the minimum 4-year requirement for a cash bonus enlistment option. He completed the required training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannoneer). The highest grade that he achieved was pay grade E-2.
The applicant, while assigned to Fort Polk, Louisiana, left his unit in an absent without leave (AWOL) status from 30 December 1979-3 September 1980. He returned to military control at the United States Army Personnel Control Facility, Fort Dix, New Jersey, on 4 September 1980. On the same date, court-martial charges were preferred against him for this AWOL offense.
On 5 September 1980, the applicant underwent a psychiatric evaluation by professionally trained personnel and he was mentally cleared for separation. During the evaluation process, the applicant stated that he could not cope with military life. He also stated that he was experiencing family problems.
On 23 September 1980, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. He was advised that he could receive a UOTHC discharge. He authenticated a statement with his signature acknowledging that he understood the ramifications and effects of receiving a UOTHC discharge. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 7 October 1980, the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request for discharge with a UOTHC discharge. He stated that in his opinion the applicant had no motivation for continued service and that he believed he would not respond to either counseling or rehabilitation.
On 8 October 1980, the applicant's intermediate commander also recommended approval with a UOTHC discharge. On 20 October 1980, the separation authority directed that the applicant be reduced to pay grade E-1 and separated with a UOTHC discharge. The applicant was placed on excess leave pending completion of his separation.
On 20 November 1980, the applicant was separated in absentia with a UOTHC discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. He had completed 8 months and 26 days of active military service and he had 248 days of lost time due to being AWOL.
On 20 October 1997, the ADRB denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge was authorized, a UOTHC discharge was considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
3. The Board took into consideration the applicant's entire record of service and was convinced that both the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were appropriate considering the facts surrounding his discharge.
4. The applicant expressed that he was experiencing personal problems after he returned from being AWOL, however, there is no evidence that he sought assistance through his chain of command prior to going AWOL. The Board determined that he had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance with his problems without committing the misconduct that led to the separation action under review.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__kak___ __aao___ __rjw___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2002068671 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020702 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (UOTHC) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19801120 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200, Ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A60.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.6000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104989C070208
d. The applicant's failure to timely file her request for correction of her military records should be excused because of her mental condition. On 12 February 1980, the applicant went AWOL from her unit in Germany. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070888C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 29 April 1981, the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request for separation with a UOTHC discharge. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2002070888SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20020926TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UOTHC)DATE OF DISCHARGE19810515DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200, Ch 10DISCHARGE REASONA01.33BOARD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013650C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge. At the time of the applicant’s separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of an UOTHC discharge. There is no evidence in the available records nor did the applicant provide any documentation that he was told if he was AWOL for 75 days that he would be separated "for the good of the service."
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705681C070209
On 7 February 1980, a Navy physician diagnosed the applicant with inadequate personality. On 14 February 1980, the Army sent the applicant for a mental status evaluation. The evaluating physician found no evidence of mental illness; however, because of his history of schizophrenia in Panama the physician referred him to Psychiatry. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705681
On 14 February 1980, the Army sent the applicant for a mental status evaluation. The evaluating physician found no evidence of mental illness; however, because of his history of schizophrenia in Panama the physician referred him to Psychiatry. On 23 April 1980, the applicant was discharged in the pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021594
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to a general discharge (GD) 2. On 2 May 1980, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, and directed he receive an UOTHC discharge. On 19 May 1980, the applicant was discharged accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000582
The applicant requests, in effect, that his character and reason for discharge be upgraded from an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) in lieu of trial by court-martial discharge to an honorable discharge due to physical disability. Also on 8 October 1980, after consulting with counsel and being advised of this rights and options, the applicant submitted a formal request under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711486
APPLICANT STATES : That he enlisted for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 52B. The applicant received an Enlisted Evaluation Report (EER) for the period March - July 1978, during which period he worked in duty MOS 63B. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076143C070215
The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant's Report of Separation and Record of Service, NGB Form 22, shows he was discharged from the ARARNG (but not as a Reserve of the Army) on 28 May 1979 by reason of being ordered to involuntary active duty. Counsel stated that it was the applicant's understanding that he was discharged from military service and that he was completely unaware of being placed on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000903
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 23 April 1980, the separation authority approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and reduction to PV1/E-1. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 21 May 1980 in...