Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056980C070420
Original file (2001056980C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 5 February 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001056980

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. June Hajjar Chairperson
Ms. Karol A. Kennedy Member
Mr. Roger W. Able Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his disability discharge be revoked and his records be corrected to show he elected transfer to the Retired Reserve.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was not advised of the option to transfer to the Retired Reserve. Due to this injustice, he is considered a former member instead of a retired member and is not entitled to all the benefits and privileges he would receive as a retired member.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 19 January 1942. After having had prior enlisted service, he was commissioned in the U. S. Army Reserve in 1979. He was voluntarily ordered to active duty in an active guard/reserve (AGR) status on 30 November 1986.

The applicant’s physical evaluation board (PEB) proceedings are not available. On 9 October 1996, he was discharged, with severance pay, from the U. S. Army Reserve by reason of disability with a 20 percent disability rating. His Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, shows he was authorized $119,505.60 in disability severance pay. He had completed a total of 12 years, 2 months, and 5 days of creditable active service and a total of 33 years, 1 month, and 12 days of service for pay.

Orders P-10-306502, U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) dated 6 October 2000 placed the applicant on the retired list effective 19 January 2001. It is not known if these orders were amended (since his 60th birthday was not until 19 January 2002) or have been revoked.

In the processing of this application, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Transition and Separations Branch, AR-PERSCOM. That office recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request. It noted that he could have elected to forfeit the disability severance pay, enter the Retired Reserve, and receive retired pay at age 60. His DD Form 214 shows he elected severance pay. Revocation of his discharge orders would require that his severance pay be repaid; however, Army Regulation 635-40 clearly states that disability severance pay cannot be repaid for the purposes of receiving retired pay.

A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. He did not respond within the given time frame.

Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The regulation defines “physically unfit” as unfitness due to physical disability. The unfitness is of such a degree that a soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty. Paragraph 8-9a(2) states that a soldier not on extended active duty who is unfit because of physical disability may be separated with severance pay if his or her disability is rated at less than 30 percent. Paragraph 8-9a(3) states that a soldier may forfeit severance pay, be transferred to the Retired Reserve, and receive nondisabilitiy retired pay at age 60 if at least 20 qualifying years of service for retirement have been completed and transfer to the Retired Reserve is requested. According to the provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, sections 1209 and 1213, all rights to receive retired pay at age 60 are forfeited if disability severance pay is accepted instead of transfer to the Retired Reserve. Disability severance pay (unlike readjustment and separation pay) cannot be repaid for the purposes of receiving retired pay.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1209 states that any member who has at least 20 years of service for a nonregular retirement and who would be qualified for retirement under chapter 61 (Retirement or Separation for Disability) but for the fact that his disability is less than 30 percent may elect, instead of being separated, to be transferred to the inactive status and, if otherwise eligible, to receive retired pay upon becoming 60 years of age. Section 1213 states that a member who has received disability severance pay is not entitled to any payment from the armed force from which he was separated for, or arising out of, his service before separation.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant has provided no evidence to show he was not properly counseled concerning the benefits of declining severance pay in favor of transfer to the Retired Reserve and receipt of retired pay 5 or 6 years later. He was provided a copy of the advisory opinion which reiterated he was authorized over $119,000 in severance pay when he separated and, if his request were granted, he would be indebted to the Government for that amount. He failed to respond to the advisory opinion within the given time frame.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jh____ __kak___ __rwa___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001056980
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020205
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 135.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025246

    Original file (20100025246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    a. Paragraph 4-19 (PEB decisions - common criteria) states the DA Form 199 will inform the Soldier of legal or administrative requirements that impact on the Soldier’s disability benefits in certain situations, such as when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30% and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-regular service: "You have the option of accepting discharge with disability severance pay and forfeiting retirement for non-regular service; or you may request transfer to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017271

    Original file (20090017271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically retired or retained on active duty and given a physical profile. The DA Form 199, block 13 (Election of Soldier) shows that on 22 July 2002 the applicant concurred with the PEB's findings and recommendations and waived his right to a formal hearing of his case. Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-19 states when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017968

    Original file (20140017968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. The applicant states, in effect, he was medically discharged with severance pay; however, he does not understand why he does not have retirement status after serving 23 years in the Army National Guard (ARNG). The commissary and exchange privileges are valid for a two-year period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015573

    Original file (20080015573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received a 20 percent disability rating for an injury to his knee while on active duty but should have been medically retired due to the effects of his injury. It states that he was found not qualified for service with a physical profile of 113111 and recommended that he appear before an MEB. The PEB stated that based on a review of the objective medical evidence of record, it found the applicant's medical and physical impairment prevented...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000043C070205

    Original file (20060000043C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states the civilian handling his case recommended he not take the 10 percent severance pay because he would have to pay it back when he started to receive his retired pay. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 August 2005 and his DA Form 199 (Physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006232

    Original file (20090006232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-40 provides for the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform the military duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating because of a physical disability. Army Regulation 635-40 requires that when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-regular service the DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board [PEB] Proceedings) should have the entry: "You have the option of accepting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007277

    Original file (20120007277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states a physical evaluation board (PEB) found him unfit for service and recommended his discharge with severance pay. In a memorandum from the applicant to the USAPDA, Subject: Disability Election: Separation with Severance Pay or Transfer to the Retired Reserve, dated 7 September 2004, he provided his election of severance pay or transfer to the Retired Reserve. e. He also provided the following additional documentation in response the advisory opinion: * a memorandum from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026196

    Original file (20100026196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant elected not to concur with the PEB's findings and recommendations and requested a formal hearing. b. the PEB also noted the applicant had a rating of less than 30% and at least 20 qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement under the provisions of chapter 67 of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC); therefore, he had the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement pay, or he had the option of requesting a transfer to inactive Reserve status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009696

    Original file (20080009696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a supplemental letter, dated 12 May 2008; a letter from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, dated 20 February 2008; a memorandum, Subject: Transfer to an Inactive Status or Discharge with Severance Pay, dated 14 January 1988; a memorandum, Subject: Review of Proceedings of Physical Evaluation Board, dated 11 August 1987; an extract from Army Regulation 635-40, dated 13 December 1985; his Notification of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001278

    Original file (20110001278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AHRC stated the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code [on his DD Form 214] would be "LBK" based on completion of required active service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4. b. AHRC directed the TC to enter the following statement in item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214: "The Soldier has been separated by reason of physical disability and has elected Reserve Retirement In-Lieu of Severance; No Severance Pay is...