Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052244C070420
Original file (2001052244C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 12 April 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001052244


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Joyce A. Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Roger W. Able Chairperson
Mr. Donald P. Hupman Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his separation program designator (SPD) code
of “JFL” be changed to “TA 120” (Transition Assistance) due to his medical discharge with severance pay and that his separation orders be amended to show that he was entitled to medical care, post exchange (PX), and
commissary privileges.

3. The applicant states that item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) should show the entry
“TA-120” and that his separation orders should show that he was entitled to medical care for 4 months and PX and commissary privileges for a period of
2 years. He also stated that this information was omitted from his separation orders at the time of his discharge. In support of his application he submits
a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his separation orders.

4. The applicant’s military records show he enlisted on 3 December 1993 as
a military policeman. He continued to serve until he was honorably discharged on 15 May 1999 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, para 4-24b(3) for disability with severance pay. He was issued an SPD code of “JFL”.

5. The applicant provided a copy of US Army Combined Arms Center and Fort Leavenworth Orders 040-0002, dated 9 February 1999. However, his additional instructions do not show entitlement to transition benefits.

6. Army Regulation 635-5-1 prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the separation program designator “JFL” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is appropriate when
the narrative reason for discharge is “Disability, Severance Pay” and that the authority for discharge is “AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3)”.

7. Army Personnel Command Message with a Date/Time Group of 111545Z May 1995, outlined the Transition Assistance Program Update-Implementing
DODI 1332.36. Change 1 to DODI 1332.36 contains a table with a revised list of SPD codes that confer transition benefits. DODI 1332.36 provides, in pertinent part, that personnel who are involuntarily separated with an SPD code of JFL are authorized extended commissary and PX privileges for a period of 2 years and medical care for a period 120 days after separation.







8. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was provided by the US Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), Chief, Retirements and Separation Branch. PERSCOM stated that the applicant’s case has merit. PERSCOM also stated that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should have the transition center at Fort Myer amend the applicant’s separation orders to reflect that he and his dependents were authorized post exchange (PX) and commissary privileges for a period of 2 years. The orders should be further amended to show that the applicant and all dependents have authorization for medical care in a military treatment facility for a period not to exceed 120 days. The effective date for both actions should be established from the date of the amended orders. PERSCOM further stated that there is no authority to enter the term “TA-120” on the applicant’s DD Form 214.

9. The applicant was provided a copy of the favorable opinion for possible comment prior to consideration of his case. The applicant was provided 20 days to respond; however, he did not respond.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, for disability with severance pay and was assigned the proper SPD code of “JFL” in accordance with established regulations.

2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was entitled to transition benefits at the time of his discharge based on his SPD code of “JFL”. Therefore,
the Board concludes that his separation orders should be amended to show that he was authorized post exchange (PX) and commissary privileges for a period of 2 years and 120 days of medical care. The effective date of such benefits should be established from the date of the amended orders.

3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by amending Headquarters, US Army Combined Arms Center and Fort Leavenworth Orders 040-0002, dated 9 February 1996 to show:






a. additional instructions: s. Expiration post exchange/commissary for a period of 2 years; and

b. additional instructions: t. Expiration medical for a period of 120 days.

2. The effective date of both actions will be established from the date of the amended orders.

3. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__ra___ ___dh___ ___rd__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____Roger W. Able____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001052244
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20010412
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19990515
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-40
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 191
2. 1021
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004467

    Original file (20090004467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his separation program designator (SPD) of "JFM" (Disability, Existed Prior to Service, PEB [physical evaluation board]) be corrected to the SPD "JFL" (Disability, Severance Pay). The PEB recommended the applicant be separated with severance pay if otherwise qualified. The applicant's discharge orders dated 22 July 2008 did not provide for his discharge with severance pay with a 10 percent disability rating.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001428

    Original file (20150001428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code so that it shows he is eligible for the Transitional Assistance Management Program (TAMP). He states he received orders authorizing his TAMP after his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) was issued. His DD Form 214 shows in: * Item 25 (Separation Authority) Army Regulation 635-200 (AD Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4 * Item 26 (Separation Code) KBK * Item 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017968

    Original file (20140017968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. The applicant states, in effect, he was medically discharged with severance pay; however, he does not understand why he does not have retirement status after serving 23 years in the Army National Guard (ARNG). The commissary and exchange privileges are valid for a two-year period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013503

    Original file (20080013503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States, the applicant also submitted to the Board, he states in effect, that the VA (Department of Veterans Affairs) has determined that he has disabilities which are considered by that agency to be 100% totally and permanently disabling effective 29 November 2000. The applicant did not provide a copy of these documents with his request and they are therefore not available for the Board's review;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065073C070421

    Original file (2001065073C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 28 of her DD Form 214 should show the entry “Temporarily Retired due to Disability” instead of the entry “Disability, Severance Pay.” In support of her application, she submits copies of: her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile); Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination); Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History); DA Form 5181-R (Screening Note of Acute Medical Care); Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069269C070402

    Original file (2002069269C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB stated that the applicant was unfit for further military duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3, paragraph 3-32; and should be referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). In computing pay for disability with severance pay, a member with less than 6 months service cannot receive severance pay, and the member may apply to the VA for disability compensation. The MEB stated that the applicant was unfit for further military duty under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003627

    Original file (20090003627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant entered the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and underwent an MEBD proceeding on 13 December 2007. It shows that Soldiers involuntarily discharged under the authority of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of disability with severance pay will be assigned SPD Code “JFL.” Furthermore, Army Regulation 635-5-1 does not contain SPD Codes “JFI” or JEA.” DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s SPD Code has nothing to do with whether or not his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061531C070421

    Original file (2001061531C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Paragraph 1-6 states, in pertinent part, that indebtedness to the U.S. Army may be remitted or canceled under 10 USC 4837 in cases arising from payments made in error to a soldier; payments made in excess of an allowance on behalf of a soldier; debts incurred while serving as an officer of the U.S. Army; debts acknowledged as valid; debts for which an appeal has been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010372

    Original file (20080010372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) show that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code of "JFL" and a RE Code of "3." His DD Form 214 stated that he was separated from the Army in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3), disability, severance pay, with a Separation Code JFL and a RE Code of 3. Pertinent Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001673

    Original file (20140001673.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 20 October 2004 to show all appropriate codes in the "Special Additional Information” section. He should be entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was honorably discharged, under the provisions of paragraph 4-24b(3) of Army Regulation 635-40 by reason of disability with entitlement to severance pay and with the appropriate or corresponding...