| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Ms. June Hajjar | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:
Subsequent to the Board's 9 November 2000 consideration of this case, the US Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) notified the Board on 3 January 2001 that it does not have the authority to correct the applicant’s Army National Guard Records to show award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM).
THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:
3. At the time of the Board’s 9 November 2000 decision in this case, it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time of his discharge from the Pennsylvania ARNG (PAARNG) on 17 December 1993.
4. The Board notes that the dates of eligibility for award of the ARCAM specified in paragraph 1 of the previous conclusions are in error and should read from
28 July 1988 to 27 July 1992 vice the 12 April 1988 through 11 April 1992 dates previously specified.
5. In view of the fact that the applicant was discharged from the PAARNG after the eligibility period for award of the ARCAM and was issued an NGB Form
22, the PAARNG has the authority to correct the applicant’s record and issue him an NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22) to show the award of the ARCAM for the period of service 28 July 1988 through 27 July 1992.
6. The Board also notes that since the applicant is currently serving in an active duty status, he should provide a copy of the NGB Form 22A to his records custodian so that his active duty records will reflect the new award.
7. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:
That insofar as the Department of the Army is concerned, the records related to this case should be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation appearing in the Proceedings, dated 9 November 2000, to show that the Board recommended that the Army National Guard Bureau request that the PAARNG
provide the individual concerned an NGB Form 22A to show award of the ARCAM for the period of service between 28 July 1988-27 July 1992.
BOARD VOTE:
__jh____ __le_____ __kah___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
__June Hajjar_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR20000051817 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010125 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (NA)) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | NA |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | NA |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002675C071108
The applicant requests award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM) and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). Since 3 March 1972 the medal has been authorized on completion of 4 years service with a Reserve Component unit. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000050820
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 000815. In view of the above, the PAARNG is requested to change the applicant’s NGB Form 22A (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to reflect that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 8-27f, by reason of unsatisfactory participation. In view of the above, the PAARNG is requested to change the applicant’s NGB Form 22A (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to reflect that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002463
He responded by reiterating his request to be issued a 15 year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, and further requests that he be given 20 additional inactive duty points for RYE 12 June 1998 for completion of the Army Sales and Management Training Course which would give him a total of 53 retirement points for that year; and he requests that he be given 4 months credit for the months he was assigned to different units between 28 June 1992 to 27 June 1993. While...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004924
He further states he entered active service on 12 October 1988 and was discharged from active duty on 20 February 2000. The applicant provides two DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 20 February 2000 and 27 May 1975; a letter from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The Adjutant General of Pennsylvania, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Military Personnel Support Branch; his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 16...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012831
The applicant provides: * Orders 310-153, issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, dated 6 November 2003 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 April 2005 * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), prepared on 18 April 2005 * Permanent Orders 008-0033, issued by Headquarters, 28th Signal Battalion, Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG), dated 28 November 2005 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012416
The applicant also submits a copy of an ARCAM award memorandum, dated 7 October 1995, showing his award of the ARCAM (4th Award) for the period 1 August 1992 to 31 July 1995. He was awarded the OSR for that period of service. The evidence shows that on 7 October 1995 he was issued a memorandum awarding him the ARCAM (4th Award) for the period 1 August 1992 to 31 July 1995.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002354C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. However, the available evidence of record shows he did not complete any qualifying years during his Reserve Component service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010188C070208
The applicant requests promotion to colonel with a promotion effective date the same as the approval date of his promotion selection board, with entitlement to back pay and allowances. In this advisory opinion, the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB, stated that the applicant was requesting the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to go back and overrule a decision which The Adjutant General (TAG) of the state of Pennsylvania made not to promote him to colonel, based on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073196C070403
On 17 April 2001, the MP-EPP Manager responded to the request stating that the request was denied. In the applicant's case, he will be eligible to be considered during the January 2002 board. A response was received from the NGB IG, which determined that the applicant was entitled to a STAB since his records were not submitted and was considered to be a material error.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007127C070205
The applicant further states that the release of the MRB results allowed him to once again start the progress required for his promotion packet. The NGB Personnel Division official recommended that the applicant's date of rank for CW2 be adjusted from 18 November 2002 to 9 January 2002, due to the fact that was the date he was found medically fit for duty by the State Surgeon. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army...