Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711464
Original file (9711464.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 14 January 1999
         DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-11464
                                    AR1999016136


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Loren G. Harrell Director
Mr. Kenneth Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Ms. Shirley L. Powell Member
Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Member


         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests physical disability retirement or separation.

The applicant states that she was raped during her military service, was not allowed an attorney, or even counseling, but sent back to her unit, which continued to abuse her, and due to that retaliation she sustained several injuries to her legs, feet, and pelvis, requiring hospitalization. The Army tried to deny any of this and hide their maltreatment of her. She was sent on two missions to Vietnam, once on official orders and then transferred to Cambodia.

The CID investigation obtained witness statements and paid or promised individuals or threatened individuals, resulting her being charged with lying to the CID. During her hospitalization she was raped by the doctor who examined her while she was strapped down, and his civilian assistant helped him. She was not his only victim.

The sexual harassment worsened at Darmstadt and because of the trauma, she was unable to perform her duties. Consequently, she was given a general discharge.

The asthma mentioned was a chemical pneumonia sustained by being sprayed and drenched in napalm and agent orange in Vietnam. She also developed problems with her right leg. She was in excellent physical condition prior to her entry into the Army. She was also electrocuted with 250 volts of electricity while undergoing military intelligence training. She is entitled to compensation. She also wants the CID investigators’ names, units, addresses, real CID reports, polygraph examinations, and all evidence concerning her service connected disabilities.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Army on 18 May 1976, completed training, and in January 1977 was assigned to a battery of the 32nd Army Air Defense Command in Germany as a clerk typist.

Included herein by reference (ATTACHED) is a 1 Novembr1995 decision by this Board denying the applicant’s request to upgrade her discharge and to remove all derogatory information from her records.

A 12 April 1977 report of medical examination indicates that the applicant was medically qualified for discharge with a physical profile of T3 1 T3 1 1 1. That report indicates that she had a temporary profile for asthma and a temporary profile for Achilles tendonitis until 22 June 1977. The report also indicates she had a history of asthma and expiratory wheezing. In the report of medical history that she furnished for the examination, the applicant stated that besides having asthma, she felt fine.

Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, she must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.

Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, as amended, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, her continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that she was unable to perform her duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.

Army Regulation 40-501, at paragraph 3-3a, provided, in pertinent part, that performance of duty despite an impairment would be considered presumptive evidence of physical fitness.

Army Regulation 635-40 was changed by Department of the Army message, dated 27 February 1973, to provide that when a member is undergoing evaluation because of a referral arising during processing for separation for reasons other than physical disability, her continued performance of duty until she is scheduled for separation creates a presumption that the member is fit for duty.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 10 May 1977, the date of her discharge. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 10 May 1980.

The application is dated 17 August 1997 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rvo___ ___slp__ ___kan__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




                  Loren G. Harrell
                  Director



INDEX

CASE ID AC
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607511C070209

    Original file (9607511C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, physical disability retirement or separation. APPLICANT STATES: That (the Army) failed to include all of his limitations, therefore there is no evidence that he was cured in the service. The applicant had no disabling medical condition at the time of his separation from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106884C070208

    Original file (04106884C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of a 16 November 1997 medical record, two physical profile reports, a DA Form 7349-R (Initial Medical Review – Annual Medical Certificate), a Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER), an OKARNG Form 17-1 (Separation/Discharge/Inactive National Guard Request), a 2 April 2003 memorandum from an Oklahoma Army National Guard personnel officer, a 15 September 1997 cardiovascular clinic encounter form, a 27 October 1997 radiological report, a 30 June 2003...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005090

    Original file (20090005090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 3-27a(1)(d) provides that Soldiers who are diagnosed as having asthma may be placed on a temporary profile under the "P" factor of the physical profile for up to 12 months' trial of duty, when medically advisable. The applicant's last NCOER in his records shows he was able to perform the duties of his rank and his MOS. There is no record the applicant was given a permanent profile for his asthma.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710409

    Original file (9710409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, disability retirement or separation. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016105

    Original file (20140016105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was barred from reenlistment on 30 November 1982 for weight control. On 30 November 1982, her commander initiated a Bar to Reenlistment Certificate due to her NJP on 26 January 1981 for being AWOL. There is no evidence her varicose veins or possible asthma prevented her from performing the duties of her rank and MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707458

    Original file (9707458.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. That without the additional military medical information requested, nor further medical advisory was warranted. Further, his enlistment in the Army Reserve on 30 September 1992, one day after his separation, directly contradicts his contention that he believes that he was physically unfit for further military service at the time of separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199708934

    Original file (199708934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706026

    Original file (9706026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Army Regulation 40-501 provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607600C070209

    Original file (9607600C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: In essence, that he served in combat in Vietnam; that he believes that his service during that period of time caused him to be unfit for military service; and that granting his request would provide him a Civil Service benefit. Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 3-2b(2), provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his or her continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until he or she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199711263

    Original file (199711263.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. She was administered medication and given a profile that stated no physical training. The applicant's records do not contain any evidence, and she has not provided any probative medical evidence to show that she had a medical condition, which would have rendered her medically unable to pass her APFT.