Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711110
Original file (9711110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Physical disability separation or retirement pay.

APPLICANT STATES : The applicant made no statement, other than referring to “St. Clair v. U.S.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was discharged from the Army at Fort Carson, Colorado and transferred to the Reserve reinforcement control group at St. Louis on 18 June 1992 in the pay grade of E-4. He was discharged for the convenience of the government under the FY 92 early transition program, and awarded a special separation bonus (SSB) of $29,378.53. He had a total of 13 years, 4 months, and 1 day of active service, and 4 years, 1 month, and 6 days of prior inactive service.

Army policy and the Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowances Entitlements Manual (DODPM), based on Public Law 102-190, 5 December 1991, as amended, prescribes the qualifications for entitlement to readjustment benefits for certain voluntarily separated members. The SSB is available to members who are retainable on active duty and request voluntarily separation from active duty prior to selection
for an involuntary separation. Generally, to qualify for the SSB individuals must have served on active duty for more than 6 years prior to enactment of this law, served at least 5 years of continuous active duty preceding separation, and meet such other requirements as the Secretary may prescribe which could include requirements relating to years of
service, skill, and grade. The SSB is a single, lump-sum payment equal to 15 percent of the annual base pay times the number of years on active duty.

In late 1991 and early 1992 the PERSCOM announced implementing instructions for the FY 92 enlisted voluntary early transition program and provided for the voluntary release from active duty for specific categories of soldiers with monetary incentives authorized. One of these incentives was a SSB, a lump sum payment equal to 15 percent of the soldier’s basic monthly pay, multiplied by 12 and multiplied again by the soldier’s years of service. Soldiers approved for SSB must enter into a written agreement to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than three years.

Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating.

Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, as amended, provides that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.

DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1. The applicant's continued performance of duty raised a presumption of fitness which he has not overcome by evidence of any unfitting, acute, grave illness or injury concomitant with his separation.

2. In order to receive SSB, the applicant had to be retainable on active duty. He could not have been retained on active duty if he was physically unfit. There is no evidence to indicate that the applicant had any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing. Therefore, there is no basis for physical disability retirement or separation.

3. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION : The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE :

GRANT

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

DENY APPLICATION




                                                      Karl F. Schneider
                                                      Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606022C070209

    Original file (9606022C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the she had numerous medical problems throughout her career, service medical records do not indicate any medical condition incurred while entitled to receive basic pay which was so severe as to render the applicant medically unfit for retention on active duty. Accordingly, the applicant was separated from active duty for reasons other than physical disability. The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011646C070208

    Original file (20040011646C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He notes the rating was effective on 28 March 1995 and the medical conditions which served as the basis for his VA disability rating were related to his military service. According to the applicant's VA rating documents, in March 1995 he was granted a combined disability rating of 30 percent. The evidence of record indicates he did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057042C070420

    Original file (2001057042C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show he was separated under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) and not the Special Separation Benefit (SSB). The applicant states, in effect, that he initially requested separation under the VSI but changed his mind at the Fort Dix, NJ separation and transfer point and requested the SSB. His DD Form 214, item 18 shows he was authorized the SSB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510341C070209

    Original file (9510341C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel message dated 20 December 1991 that originally announced the VSIP to support the Army drawdown, stated, in pertinent part, that soldiers in the pay grade of E-4 (promotable) and below with more than 7 years of service as of 31 December 1991 could apply for separation under the VSIP during the period 1 January 1992 through 29 February 1992. The 20 December 1991 message also set forth the specific criteria for VSIP eligibility and provided the authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088901C070403

    Original file (2003088901C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That his pay was garnished while he was on the TDRL (temporary disability retired list), to satisfy the provisions of 10 USC, 1174 (h); however, he suffered an injustice because he was medically retired after 16 years of service. The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, paragraph 040602, states in pertinent part, "If a member who has received an SSB payment becomes eligible for retired pay, recoup from the member the gross amount of SSB received, as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506342C070209

    Original file (9506342C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted on 5 November 1984 for a period of 3 years. Although not explained in the available records, orders were published on 25 June 1991 which authorized the applicant to separate from the service prior to his ETS, on 28 November 1991, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, and considering that there were no early release programs announced at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064450C070421

    Original file (2001064450C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he elected separation from active Army under the Variable Separation Incentive (VSI) Program instead of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program. Initially, only a non-monetary, voluntary separation program was announced providing retirement opportunities for some soldiers who had less than 20 but more than 15 years of active military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508228C070209

    Original file (9508228C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he was separated under the Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (VSIP) and that he receive all entitlements authorized under the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option. The applicant states that he originally applied for separation under the Voluntary Early Transition (VET) Program. However, before he was separated, the VSIP was announced and he was afforded the opportunity to apply for separation under the SSB option of the VSIP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508451C070209

    Original file (9508451C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a second alternative, he requests correction of his military records to show that he elected the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) option in lieu of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) option offered under the VSIP. Service members who were approved for the VSIP had the option of receiving either the VSI or the SSB. Further, the PERSCOM noted that case that the approval of the applicant’s request for the SSB option and the implementation of the legislatively amended VSI benefits...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012150

    Original file (20140012150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant request correction of her records to show she has enough qualifying years for entitlement to a nonregular retirement. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), in effect at the time, stated that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1) attained age 60; (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of...