APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her records be corrected by changing the reason for her discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: She makes no statements, but cites her Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) case; two previous DD Forms 293 (one requesting a change in her reentry code; one requesting the reason for her separation be changed because she had been made a scapegoat for the combat death of a fellow soldier in Panama in 1989. She believes a superior in her chain of command actually killed the soldier.) She also mentions witness of substantial and relevant evidence, with name and previously-held position, but no supporting documentation from that individual is attached to the application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicants military records are not available. Information herein was obtained from alternate sources.
She was born on 17 April 1963. She enlisted on 1 May 1986. She completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 31M (Multi-Channel Communications System Operator).
On 9 August 1989, the applicant was admitted to Gorgas Army Hospital, Panama for an alcohol problem. She was diagnosed with paranoid disorder, provisional; alcohol intoxification, resolved; and alcohol abuse, continuous.
On 2 October 1989, the applicant completed the Alcohol Rehabilitation Center program and was returned to full duty.
A psychiatric evaluation completed at Gorgas Army Hospital diagnosed the applicant as borderline personality disorder with paranoic features; mixed personality disorder with borderline paranoid features.
The separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5-31, Personality Disorder, is not available.
On 16 February 1990, the applicant was honorably discharged in pay grade E-4 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5-31, personality disorder. She received a reentry code of 3. She had completed 3 years, 9 months and 16 days of creditable active service with no lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 5, paragraph 5-31, sets the policy and prescribes procedures for separating members with a personality disorder (not amounting to a disability) that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty when so diagnosed by a physician trained in psychiatry and psychiatric diagnosis.
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waiverable.
Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of Chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210, Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program. Therefore, since enlistment criteria does change, and since an individual has the right to apply for a waiver, the applicant should periodically visit her local recruiting station to determine if she should apply for a waiver.
On 19 November 1996, the ADRB denied the applicants request to change the reason for her discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.
3. There is no basis for removal of the RE code from the applicants record. The disqualification upon which the code was based, however, can be waived for reenlistment purposes.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710234
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:1. There is no basis for removal of the RE code from the applicant’s record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002233C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the wording "Personality Disorder" from Block 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty). The counselor further stated that based on the evaluation, she recommended the applicant for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-13 for personality disorder with an Honorable Discharge Certificate. There...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711519
APPLICANT REQUESTS : Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “1.” In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications which preclude reenlistment. On 25 November 1996, the applicant’s commander initiated separation proceedings under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure. The complete separation proceedings are not available.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087787C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his request for Correction of the appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code that would allow him to enlist in the Army. Although the applicant may have been able to
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018335
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on SPD code JFX is personality disorder and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13. The applicant contends she did not have a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012570
The applicant requests change of her reentry eligibility (RE) code to an RE code of 1 so she can reenter the Army. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code JFV is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, by reason of a condition, not a disability. Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058216C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 January 1996, the applicant was separated in Hanau, Germany with an Honorable Discharge under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a personality disorder. The ADRB, after considering her case on 5 September 2001, denied her request for a change in reason while stating that the board did not have the authority to change her RE code.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101839C070208
On 8 January 2002, the applicant unit commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of personality disorder. The evidence of record also confirms that the applicant’s discharge processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707709
On 26 September 1991, the applicant’s commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5-31, Personality Disorder. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. There is no basis for removal of the RE code from the applicant’s record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707709C070209
On 26 September 1991, the applicants commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5-31, Personality Disorder. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. There is no basis for removal of the RE code from the applicants record.