| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Robert J. McGowan | Analyst |
| Ms. JoAnn H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her separation code be changed to permit her to reenlist. In effect, she is requesting that her reason for separation be changed.
APPLICANT STATES: That she did not have a behavioral disorder; that she did not fail to meet minimum standards for behavior and performance; that she had personal difficulties caused by being one half of a military couple.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
She enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years on 5 January 1995. Following basic and advanced training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, she was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 71L, Administrative Specialist, and transferred to Germany along with her soldier-husband. She arrived in Germany on/about 18 May 1995.
Shortly after being assigned to a unit in Germany, the applicant began to hear about possible deployment to Bosnia. She told her chain of command that she
" . . . would rather commit suicide than go to Bosnia." She was counseled and informed that she could be separated from the Army under the provisions of chapter 5, Army Regulation 635-200, for a personality disorder if she persisted in making such statements. She was referred to the Heidleburg Medical Center for physical and mental evaluations.
The applicant was given medical and mental evaluations on 2 December 1995. She was found to be physically and mentally qualified for duty; there was no evidence of psychiatric illness, but she had a personality disorder with borderline dependant features. She was assessed as a low suicide risk, but it was felt that she could make a suicide gesture to avoid deployment. She was found to be unsuitable for continued service.
On 26 December 1995, the applicant was notified that she was being separated under the provisions of chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200. She was advised of her rights and consulted with legal counsel. She indicated that she was not suited for the Army and felt that separation would be in the best interest of the Army. The separation action was approved on 4 January 1996. She requested separation in Germany because her husband was also assigned there.
On 12 January 1996, the applicant was separated in Hanau, Germany with an Honorable Discharge under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a personality disorder. She was assigned a separation code of "JFX" and an RE code of RE-3, not eligible to reenlist without a waiver.
The applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a change in the reason for her discharge and her RE code. The ADRB, after considering her case on 5 September 2001, denied her request for a change in reason while stating that the board did not have the authority to change her RE code.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-13 provides that a soldier may be separated for personality disorder (not amounting to disability) that interferes with assignment or with performance of duty.
Army Regulation 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes, prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory or other directives), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty. The correct SPD code for soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 is "JFX."
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons, including those who have been diagnosed with personality disorders, are assigned RE-3 codes.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant was joint domiciled with her soldier-husband; the Army was accommodating her marriage to a fellow soldier. Faced with the possibility of deployment to Bosnia, the applicant, a Regular Army soldier, balked and began insisting that she would commit suicide rather than obey orders. When counseled that she could be separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, she stated that that course of action would be best for all concerned.
3. The applicant’s discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with applicable law and regulations. She was properly evaluated by competent medical authority and found to be suffering from a personality disorder, not amounting to a disability. Her narrative reason for separation, her SPD code, and her assigned RE code are correct; there is no error or injustice.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JHL___ ___MHM __LAH __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001058216 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010918 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | DIRECTOR |
| ISSUES 1. | 100.0300 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606018C070209
The applicants commanding officer initiated action to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, for a personality disorder. On 1 March 1995 the separation authority (Commander of the Medical Activity (MEDDAC) at Fort McClellan), directed that the applicant be discharged and that she receive an entry level separation (uncharacterized). The applicant was approved for separation on two occasions, once on 1 March 1995 as a result of the findings and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001021
The regulation shows that the SPD code JFX as shown on the applicants DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for separation as involuntary discharge for Personality Disorder and that the authority for separation under this separation program designator is AR 635-200, Paragraph 5-13. Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE code 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated for this reason. Her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014326
The applicant states that she was separated due to a personality disorder. The psychiatrist further stated that the applicant was stable and did not need psychiatric medications. The applicant has provided opinions from a psychiatrist and psychologist stating that she never had a personality disorder.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008154
The applicant finally states, in effect, that she really didnt pay attention to what was put on her separation papers (DD Form 214), as long as it said honorable and when she could be discharged. The separation authority approved the applicants separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 due to a personality disorder, and directed that the applicant receive an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon her separation confirms, in Item...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 1999-050
PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS: DSM IV Axis I Axis II Axis III Axis IV (309.28) Adjustment disorder with anxious and depressed mood, manifested by severe dyspho- ria, feelings of hopelessness and helplessness and vague and fleeting suicidal ideation. On July 11, 199x, the applicant’s commanding officer recommended that she be discharged “by reason of convenience of the government due to medically determined adjustment disorder (a condition, not a physical disability which interferes with performance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011181
The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * 6 pages of medical documentation * U.S. Army Medical Command Form 4038 (Report of Behavioral Health Evaluation) * Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 5-13 provides the criteria for discharge because of a personality disorder. The evidence shows she was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a borderline personality disorder with recurrent, moderate, major depression...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025917
She completed training as a medical specialist and was transferred to Fort Devens, Massachusetts, for assignment to a combat support hospital. On 17 April 1989, the applicant's commander notified her that he was initiating action to discharge her from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, due to a diagnosed personality disorder. Personnel discharged by reason of a personality disorder under the provisions of paragraph 5-13 are issued a separation code...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019203
The applicant requests, in effect, his narrative reason for separation, separation code, and reentry eligibility (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed so he can enlist. Discharge proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-13, for personality disorder were initiated on 19 August 2003. The narrative reason for separation, the separation code, and the RE code used in the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018625
Applicant Name: ??? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Personality Disorder" and the separation code is "JFX." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006637
c. While the aforementioned decision addresses the VA's disability claims process of victims of MST, he believes the Court's insistence regarding the absence of record in sexual assault cases can and should apply in the applicant's case in front of the Army Discharge Review Board (i.e., the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)). The applicant reported that U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command staff told her that 4 people reported that she revealed this information while...