Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709494C070209
Original file (9709494C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
ABCMR Proceedings (cont)                         AC97-09494

2.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be retired in the rank of colonel without being entitled to the increase in pay.  That his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Legion of Merit.

3.  The applicant was separated from active duty on 27 June 1995 and placed on the retired list on 1 July 1995 with    20 years 2 months and 22 days active duty service.  He was awarded the Legion of Merit for the period 12 August 1985 to 30 June 1995.

4.  The applicant, a Reserve officer on active duty with the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) programs, was selected for promotion to colonel and would have been promoted on       28 June 1995.  However, law and regulation required his separation from active duty on 27 June 1995.  Therefore, he was unable to accept the promotion and retired as a lieutenant colonel on 1 July 1995.

5.  Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers.  It specifies that, upon transfer to the Retired reserve, an officer will be transferred in the Reserve grade for which selected for promotion, whether the transfer was due to completion of the required years of service or to age.

6.  The Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) has advised in a similar case that the individual should be promoted to the higher grade but that such action would not create an entitlement to the pay of the higher grade.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant is entitled to promotion to colonel without entitlement to pay at the higher paygrade.

2.  The foregoing is in consonance with the advisory opinion previously received from PERSCOM.

3.  The applicant’s Legion of Merit award should be shown on his DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
ABCMR Proceedings (cont)                          AC97-09494

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that, upon his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 1 July 1995, the individual concerned was promoted to colonel, without entitlement to pay in that higher grade and that he be issued a new DD Form 214 which shows he was awarded the Legion of Merit.

BOARD VOTE:


_____  _____  _____  GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

_____  _____  _____  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_____  _____  _____  DENY APPLICATION




___________________________
CHAIRPERSON























Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709494

    Original file (9709494.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be retired in the rank of colonel without being entitled to the increase in pay. The applicant was separated from active duty on 27 June 1995 and placed on the retired list on 1 July 1995 with 20 years 2 months and 22 days active duty service. The applicant, a Reserve officer on active duty with the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) programs, was selected for promotion to colonel and would have been promoted on 28 June 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711245

    Original file (9711245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071416C070402

    Original file (2002071416C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 October 1995, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, advised the applicant that in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155, an officer must be in an active status to be eligible for promotion and not be placed on the active duty list (ADL). United States Code (USC), Title 10, section 14317(e) (Oct 96) specifies that USAR officers ordered to active duty in time of war or national emergency, may, if eligible, be considered for promotion by a mandatory promotion board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081099C070215

    Original file (2002081099C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant was considered, and selected, for promotion to colonel/pay grade O-6 by a Department of the Army Special Selection Board and that his effective date of promotion was 2 March 1998. As such, the applicant is not entitled to have his records corrected to show an extension of his MRD beyond 3 September 2001, or his service beyond 30 September 2001. d. Correcting the individual’s military records to show that he was promoted to colonel/pay grade O-6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068891C070402

    Original file (2002068891C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The correct name of the board to which the applicant refers is the US Army Reserve Command Board (USARC) Colonel Command Assignment Selection Board (CCASB). The USARC CCASB, currently governed by USARC Regulation 140-5, Army Reserve Colonel and Lieutenant Colonel Command Assignment Selection Board Program, revised 1 July 2000, convenes twice a year. He submitted the necessary documents and was later informed that he had an integrity issue concerning his awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017598

    Original file (20060017598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By Headquarters, First United States Army memorandum, dated 12 June 1987, the applicant was notified that he was promoted to the rank of MAJ effective 1 October 1985, with time in grade computed from 13 April 1983 (apparently not realizing the applicant had declined promotion in 1983). On 15 May 1992, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM-STL, advised the applicant that Headquarters, First United States Army originally gave him his original date of rank of 13 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000742

    Original file (20140000742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center memorandum, dated 28 October 1983, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, states he was promoted as a Reserve commissioned officer to the rank of LTC in the MSC effective 12 August 1983. He held the rank of LTC on the date he retired from the USAR and he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC effective 2 November 2001. However, there is no evidence of record and he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706027

    Original file (9706027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. When his or her active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706027C070209

    Original file (9706027C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    When his or her active service (plus service on the retired list) totals 30 years, any retired warrant officer of the Army is entitled to be advanced on the retired list to the highest commissioned grade he or she served satisfactorily on active duty. The applicant’s retirement in pay grade W-2 was appropriate in accordance with applicable law and regulations, since that was the grade he held on the day before his date of retirement. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT ________...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080749C070215

    Original file (2002080749C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 3 April 2001, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-175, 2 years after his removal was required by law. VSI annual payments will be discontinued if the member is separated from the Ready Reserve unless the individual becomes ineligible to continue to serve due to medical or age limitations in which case the soldier will be transferred to the Standby Reserve or the Retired Reserve. The applicant was separated from active duty on...