| Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor Jr. | Member | |
| Mr. James M. Alward | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the narrative reason for her separation be changed to hardship.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that she would like the reason for her discharge changed in order to be entitled to education benefits; that she believes that in almost all pregnancy cases there is hardship involved and should be considered as such on an exception basis.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 7 May 1991 the applicant entered the Regular Army for 3 years. At the time she entered the Regular Army she had already completed 1 year, 3 months, and 12 days of honorable service in the Army National Guard.
The applicant’s record indicates that the highest rank she held while on active duty was specialist/E-4 and had earned the National Defense Service Medal and the Army Service Ribbon; however, there are no other documented acts of valor, achievement, or service warranting special recognition.
The specific facts and circumstances of the applicant’s separation, under the provisions of chapter 8, AR 635-200 are not on file. However, procedurally the applicant would have had to have undergone pregnancy counseling which would have included comprehensive counseling on her options, entitlements, and responsibilities. At the conclusion of her counseling the applicant would have had to have completed a statement indicating that she voluntarily elected to separate by reason of pregnancy, under the provisions of chapter 8, AR 635-200. There is no evidence of record that the applicant was experiencing problems that would have qualified her for a hardship discharge, or that she ever attempted to pursue this course through her chain of command by either seeking assistance for problems or applying for a hardship discharge.
The record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant, and listed the characterization of service as honorable, the authority for separation as chapter 8, AR 635-200, and the narrative reason for separation as pregnancy.
The DD Form 214 also shows a that the applicant was separated from active duty after completing 2 years, 2 months, and 8 days of her 3 year Regular Army enlistment contract.
Regulatory guidance clearly defines a pregnancy separation as a separation for the convenience of the government, not a hardship discharge. The eligibility requirements for education benefits are clearly defined and outlined in every soldier’s enlistment contract. In order to qualify for education benefits as a veteran an individual must complete at least 3 years of continuous active duty. This 3 year requirement is reduced under certain circumstances. When an individual is separated for convenience of the government, as is the case for pregnancy discharges, the 3 year requirement is reduced to completion of
30 months for those soldiers serving on an enlistment of 3 or more years.
There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the narrative reason for her discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8 then in effect, provided policies, procedures, and guidance which allowed female enlisted personnel to request discharge, by reason of pregnancy. An honorable characterization of service was normal for individuals discharged under these provisions.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s desire to have hardship coded as the reason for her separation, and her contention that she was unaware that she would not be eligible for education benefits. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant voluntarily requested discharge by reason of pregnancy which procedurally would have required extensive counseling on her options and entitlements. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.
2. The Board found no evidence of record or independent evidence submitted by the applicant which supports her contention that her separation should have been based on hardship reasons. The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214, authenticated by the applicant, which lists the reason for discharge and shows the applicant did not complete the 30 months of active duty required to qualify for education benefits. This evidence attests to the fact that the applicant voluntarily requested separation by reason of pregnancy, and that she was fully aware of the reason for her separation at the time of her separation.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706474C070209
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that she would like the reason for her discharge changed in order to be entitled to education benefits; that she believes that in almost all pregnancy cases there is hardship involved and should be considered as such on an exception basis. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 7 May 1991 the applicant entered the Regular Army for 3 years. The record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706827
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706827C070209
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the narrative reason for her discharge be changed from pregnancy to hardship. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 2 December 1980 the applicant entered the Regular Army for 3 years at the age of 18. At the time of discharge the applicant was issued a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710551
On 12 November 1981, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 8, pregnancy. Chapter 8 of that regulation states, in pertinent part, that an enlisted woman who is medically diagnosed as being pregnant may, after her unit commander has counseled her concerning her options, entitlements and responsibilities, request separation under this paragraph. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710551C070209
She initially entered the Delayed Entry Program on 20 June 1980, enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 July 1980, and was honorably discharged on 25 July 1980 under the provisions of the Trainee Discharge Program, pregnant prior to entry on active duty. On 12 November 1981, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 8, pregnancy. DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002065462C070402
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: That item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the entry "Hardship" instead of "Pregnancy," and that she receive her education benefits. On 13 January 1992, the applicant submitted a formal personnel...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077537C070215
The applicant’s DD Form 214 also verifies that she was separated under the provisions of chapter 8, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. On 14 August 2002, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request that the reason for her discharge be changed to hardship after concluding that the discharge was proper and equitable. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011372
Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code MDF is the correct code for Soldiers voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8, by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and SPD code MDB is the correct code for Soldier's voluntarily separating under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows the applicant became pregnant and underwent pregnancy counseling as required by the applicable regulation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016987
On 16 May 1983, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy and directed her service be characterized as honorable. Her DD Form 214 confirms she was discharged under the provisions of chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 with a narrative reason of separation as "pregnancy" and a separation code of "MDF." Furthermore, there is no evidence the applicant voluntarily requested separation for hardship.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009141
On 23 July 2008, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of paragraph 8-1 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. The "MDF" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary) under chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and the SPD "MDB" is the correct code for Soldier's separating (voluntary) under chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows that the applicant became...