Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199710502
Original file (199710502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 25 November 1998
         DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-10502

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Loren G. Harrell Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. James E. Vick Chairperson
Mr. John N. Slone Member
Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
         if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to honorable. (Note: In the interest of time the applicant’s DD Form 293 was accepted in lieu of a DD Form 149.)

APPLICANT STATES: His “seven months in the stockade” was “the only time [he] was in bad trouble” during his military service. In support of his request he submits two statements attesting to his good character. One of the individuals notes that “at this point in his life I feel he deserves help with his medical bills from the government.”

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered active duty on 30 July 1952 and was discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment on 12 September 1954.

On 25 October 1954, while driving a truck in a convoy in Japan, the applicant struck and killed a Japanese national. The applicant failed to stop following the accident. Just prior to his 31 March 1955 court-martial for the accident the applicant, on 10 March 1955, was discovered with coffee which he had stolen from a ration warehouse; the court-martial charges were amended.

On 31 March 1955, in consonant with his plea, he was convicted by a general court-martial of wrongfully leaving the scene of an accident and larceny of government property. His sentence included dishonorable discharge, total forfeiture, and confinement at hard labor for 18 months. The confinement portion of the sentence was reduced by the convening authority to 6 months as part of a plea agreement.

On 24 September 1955, following his release from confinement, the dishonorable discharge was executed.

In 1959 the Army Board for Correction of Military Records denied the applicant’s petition to upgrade his discharge. His request, at that time, was based on his desire to obtain an honorable discharge in order to reenlist.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. While the applicant’s conduct in the years since his discharge may have been without incident, his conviction and sentence by a general court-martial as a result of the vehicle accident which killed a foreign national was appropriate.

2. The sentence was neither in error or unjust considering the seriousness of the charge.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jev______ __jns___ _rvo____ DENY APPLICATION




                                                      Loren G. Harrell
                                                      Director



INDEX

CASE ID AC
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199710502C070209

    Original file (199710502C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any) APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to honorable. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710664

    Original file (9710664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mr.Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.ChairpersonMs.Karen L. WolfeMemberMr.James P. HuberMember Also present, without vote, were: Mr.Loren G. HarrellDirectorMr.Joseph A. AdrianceAnalyst The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709686C070209

    Original file (9709686C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He had no prior record of any disciplinary actions. On 25 June 1954, the U.S. Army Board of Review affirmed the sentence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709686

    Original file (9709686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant’s military records are not available. He had no prior record of any disciplinary actions. On 25 June 1954, the U.S. Army Board of Review affirmed the sentence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04099982C070208

    Original file (04099982C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The prosecution called a witness, one of the doctors who evaluated the applicant between 4 October and 9 October 1954, who testified that he and other medical personnel originally diagnosed the applicant as suffering from a schizophrenic reaction, a mentally ill condition; however, he stated that he changed his diagnosis on 9 October 1954 after interviewing the applicant, concluding that he knew right from wrong and that he had possession of his mental faculties – that he had no mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075192C070403

    Original file (2002075192C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 March 1955, at Camp Schimmelpfennig, Honshu, Japan, APO 201, the applicant pled guilty and was found guilty by a general court-martial for willfully disobeying a lawful order from his superior NCO to shovel snow. On 26 April 1955, the sentence was approved as adjudged, except that, in accordance with the pre-trial agreement, confinement at hard labor was reduced to 1 year. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and any issues submitted, the Board found no cause for clemency.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711388

    Original file (9711388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062412C070421

    Original file (2001062412C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 25 February 1955, he was dishonorably discharged pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial. He asserted that it was never proven that the camera he was accused of stealing was the property of the other soldier and that if the record of trial was reviewed, it would show that he was right.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706100

    Original file (9706100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707196

    Original file (199707196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record of trial shows that the applicant stated that he was in the National Guard for a year and a half prior to joining the Army, that he had a 16 year old and a 5 month old sister, that his father was unable to work, and his mother did not work. The applicant was found guilty of the charge and sentenced him to be discharged from the Army with a bad conduct discharge, to forfeit $50.00 a month for six months, and to be confined at hard labor for six months. DISCUSSION : Considering...