MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 17 December 1998
DOCKET NUMBER: AC97-07482
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Member
The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable or general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: He was barely 17 when he entered the Army and immediately became involved with the wrong crowd. He notes that he had trouble with reading and writing and was, in effect, given erroneous advice concerning how to carry out his duties. He states when he did what he was told, believing it to be correct, people laughed at him and he became angry. The applicant states his commander told him that his discharge would be upgraded after his separation. In support of his request he submits several letters from friends and family members attesting to his honorable character and service to the community.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were apparently lost or destroyed during the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis. Information contained herein was reconstructed from alternative sources, including documents provided by the applicant.
The applicant enlisted and entered active duty on 20 April 1955 at the age of 17 with 7 years of formal education. He successfully completed training as a vehicle mechanic and served nearly 11 months overseas.
At some point during his nearly 2 years of active Federal service he accumulated 122 days of lost time and was apparently recommended for administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. His separation order, published at Fort Lewis, Washington, indicates the applicants administrative separation was the result of board action.
On 26 June 1957 the applicant was released from active duty under other than honorable conditions (undesirable discharge). At the time of his separation he had completed 1 year, 10 months and 5 days of active Federal service with 122 days of lost time.
The five letters submitted in support of the applicants request are all dated in 1997 and indicate the applicant has been a good citizen.
Army Regulation 635-208, then in effect, set forth the policy and procedures for separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness. Unfitness included repeated petty offenses/frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military or civilian authorities. Action to separate an individual was to be taken when, in the judgment of the commander, rehabilitation was impractical or was unlikely to produce a satisfactory soldier. When separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with laws and regulations applicable at the time. The Board notes that the evidence indicates he may even have had the opportunity to present his case before an administrative separation board.
2. While the Board has taken cognizance of the applicants age, and his good post-service conduct, none of these factors, either individually or in sum, warrant the relief requested.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
4. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__klw___ __mhm___ ___klw__ DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
INDEX
CASE ID
AC
SUFFIX
RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707482
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089591C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was an alcoholic at the time of his military service and has been sober for 20 years. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for unfitness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015643C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050015643 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 4 January 1960, the applicant acknowledged that he had been advised by counsel of the basis for the contemplated action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. The separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004818C070206
On 17 May 1965, his unit commander recommended his elimination under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, with an undesirable discharge. On 27 May 1965, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness, and directed his reduction to Private E-1, and the issuance of an undesirable discharge. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, provided the authority for discharging enlisted personnel for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002347
On 16 February 1961, the applicant's company commander recommended that the applicant appear before a board of officers to consider him for elimination from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 prior to the expiration of his term of service for unfitness. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 10 March 1961 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and his service was characterized as under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084250C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board convened on 24 April 1957 and after hearing testimony from the applicant, whereas he stated that he wanted out of the Army, the board of officers found that he was unfit for further service and recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness. The applicant's commander submitted a recommendation to discharge him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083047C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions; however, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010981
However, his record contains a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows he was discharged on 22 November 1961 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 by reason of unfitness with a character of service as under other than honorable conditions. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010981 3 ARMY BOARD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061058C070421
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge or that the reason for discharge be changed to "Convenience of the Government." An Army Discharge Review Boards (ADRB) Case Report, dated 19 April 1962, reveals that, on 4 October 1956, the applicant's commander recommended that a board of officers meet to determine his fitness for continued military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. The Board does not condone the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081247C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...