| Mr. Loren G. Harrell | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Analyst |
| Ms. Karen L. Wolff | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Mr. Kenneth L. Wright | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable or general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: He was “barely 17” when he entered the Army and immediately “became involved with the wrong crowd.” He notes that he had trouble with reading and writing and was, in effect, given “erroneous advice” concerning how to carry out his duties. He states when he did what he was told, believing it to be correct, people laughed at him and he became angry. The applicant states his commander told him that his discharge would be upgraded after his separation. In support of his request he submits several letters from friends and family members attesting to his honorable character and service to the community.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were apparently lost or destroyed during the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis. Information contained herein was reconstructed from alternative sources, including documents provided by the applicant.
The applicant enlisted and entered active duty on 20 April 1955 at the age of 17 with 7 years of formal education. He successfully completed training as a vehicle mechanic and served nearly 11 months overseas.
At some point during his nearly 2 years of active Federal service he accumulated 122 days of lost time and was apparently recommended for administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness. His separation order, published at Fort Lewis, Washington, indicates the applicant’s administrative separation was the result of “board action.”
On 26 June 1957 the applicant was released from active duty under other than honorable conditions (undesirable discharge). At the time of his separation he had completed 1 year, 10 months and 5 days of active Federal service with 122 days of lost time.
The five letters submitted in support of the applicant’s request are all dated in 1997 and indicate the applicant has been a good citizen.
Army Regulation 635-208, then in effect, set forth the policy and procedures for separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness. Unfitness included repeated petty offenses/frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military or civilian authorities. Action to separate an individual was to be taken when, in the judgment of the commander, rehabilitation was impractical or was unlikely to produce a satisfactory soldier. When separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with laws and regulations applicable at the time. The Board notes that the evidence indicates he may even have had the opportunity to present his case before an administrative separation board.
2. While the Board has taken cognizance of the applicant’s age, and his good post-service conduct, none of these factors, either individually or in sum, warrant the relief requested.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
4. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__klw___ __mhm___ ___klw__ DENY APPLICATION
Loren G. Harrell
Director
| CASE ID | AC |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707482C070209
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710231
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether he application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant stated he received counsel and acknowledged he would be discharged under conditions other than honorable, under Army Regulation 635-208, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199706345
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge under the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP) be upgraded to honorable. On 25 August 1976 he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707921
On 29 July 1958 the applicant’s commander recommended that a board of officers be convened to determine whether the applicant should be separated for Unsuitability or Unfitness. However, it is apparent that the applicant was alcoholic, and his alcoholic behavior was the basis for his discharge. As such, the Board considers his Undesirable Discharge too harsh, especially in consideration of his combat service, his wound and his POW status.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711555
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 19 November 1963, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge and directed he be reduced to pay grade E-1 and issued an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711499
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 29 April 1965 the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199707056
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9709510
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. In 1962 the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board to grant him a medical discharge stating that he had been under the care of a psychiatrist at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9705439
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9708334
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board examined the...