APPLICANT REQUESTS: In a letter to his Congressman, that he either be compensated for his military service or he be reinstated to his former status as a reservist assigned to a unit.
APPLICANT STATES: He outlines his military history, commencing with 3 years of active duty followed by assignment to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement). While he was in the Control Group, he was given a physical examination in conjunction with his request to perform a tour of active duty. Although he was told at that time that he was medically disqualified to enter on active duty, he was never discharged. When nothing else came of that examination, he joined a USAR unit, performed his duties in an exemplary manner, and was promoted to sergeant first class. However, his military career was brought to an abrupt end starting when he was mobilized during Operation Desert Storm. In the beginning days of his mobilization, he began to feel some discomfort in my chest area and had a persistent cough. I decided to go on sick call and see a doctor. After describing my discomfort as well as my medical history, I was given a pulmonary function test. He was then given other medical tests and given physical profile limitations. When separation action was later initiated on him based on his medical condition he requested a waiver, which was denied. The applicant questions the fairness and equity of allowing him to remain in the military for almost 10 years after he was diagnosed as having a medical condition and then discharging him without benefits for the same condition. The applicant also questions some changes made by his physicians on entries made in his medical records.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military personnel and medical records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 July 1971 and was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group on 5 July 1974. He remained assigned to the Control Group until the completion of his statutory military service obligation on 11 July 1977.
He had a break in service until his enlistment in the USAR Delayed Entry Program on 11 September 1981. He then enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 October 1981 and was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR Control Group on 16 August 1984.
On 12 November 1985 he was given a physical examination wherein abnormalities were noted on his chest x-ray. The examining physician stated that he required old chest
x-rays from the applicant for comparison. The applicant was then notified of the abnormality on his x-ray, he was advised to follow-up with his civilian physician, and he was told that he was medically disqualified for enlistment.
The applicant remained assigned to the USAR Control Group not on active duty until his assignment to a USAR unit on 12 January 1987. On 9 May 1987 he was given a physical examination for the purpose of reenlisting. At that time, despite his admission to his lung problem, which had now been diagnosed as sarcoidosis, he was determined medically qualified for retention.
He was promoted to pay grade E-7 and performed duties as an instructor in a USAR School. On 1 February 1991 the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm.
On 8 February 1991, 7 days after he was mobilized, the applicant reported to sick call complaining of having a problem breathing when doing any strenuous activity. He informed the physician that he was taking medication for his lung condition and required physical profile limitations. Accordingly, he was given a permanent 4 physical profile (on a scale of 1 to 4, 1 being the best and 4 the worst), which stated No mandatory strenuous physical activity. No assignment to isolated areas where definitive medical care is not available.
The applicants active duty assignment orders were then amended to delete him and he was processed for release from active duty. He was given a separation physical examination and determined medically qualified. Accordingly, on 24 March 1991 he was released from active duty and returned to his USAR unit. He had served 1 month and 24 days.
On 25 April 1992 he was given a periodic physical examination. At that time he was again given a 4 physical profile, but determined medically disqualified for retention.
On 8 July 1992 he reported to sick call (as a reservist not on extended active duty) complaining of a persistent cough and chest pain of a 10 day duration. On 27 July 1992 the applicants civilian physician submitted a letter stating that the applicants lung condition was very clearly worsening.
Apparently the applicant requested a waiver of his medical disqualification. On 5 October 1994 the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) denied the applicants request, stating that The individuals health or well being would be compromised if he were to remain in the military service.
Accordingly, on 24 October 1994 the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve due to medical disqualification.
Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, Retirement or Separation for Physical Disability, provides for the medical retirement and for the discharge for physical unfitness, with severance pay, of soldiers who incur a physical disability in the line of duty while serving on active or inactive duty. However, the disability must have been the proximate result of performing military duty.
Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 12-1, requires the separation of reservists who are determined medically disqualified for retention who are not granted a waiver of the disqualification. The reservist will be discharged unless he or she requests transfer to the Retired Reserve.
Records obtained from the VA show that the applicant was denied service connection for his lung condition.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Since there is no evidence that the applicants disqualifying condition was either incurred or aggravated by his military service, there is no basis for medically retiring him with disability benefits.
2. The applicants lung condition was determined to be medically disqualifying under the more stringent procurement medical fitness standards, as opposed to more lenient retention standards, in 1985.
3. Although the applicant continued to serve successfully in his USAR unit with his medical condition after his 1985 physical examination, it was discovered that he was not world-wide deployable when he was mobilized during Operation Desert Storm.
4. Furthermore, the applicants civilian physician confirmed that the applicants medical condition had worsened since his mobilization during Operation Desert Storm.
5. In synopsis, the applicants medical condition was determined to be of the severity to preclude his deployment during a National emergency. Subsequent to Operation Desert Storm, his condition worsened to a significant degree which, in the opinion of the ARPERCEN Command Surgeon, would compromise his health or well being if he were to remain in the military service.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
Karl F. Schneider
Acting Director
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608376C070209
Thereafter, he was discharged without any benefits for his injuries, and was not even issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, for the period he was on active duty. The applicants counsel contends that the applicant was injured in line of duty while he was on active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm, that his injuries were of such severity as to warrant consideration by a medical evaluation board (MEB), that the military physicians treating...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003423
The applicant requests that his transfer to the Retired Reserve due to medical disqualification be corrected to a discharge for physical unfitness. Notwithstanding the USAR Personnel Command's determination that the applicant's medical disqualification was duty related, the preponderance of evidence shows that it was not. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was found medically disqualified...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021258
His record does not contain any documentation to show he revealed his medical condition to the USAR at the time of his enlistment. a. Paragraph 3-21 (Heart) states the causes for referral to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) include but is not limited to cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or congestive heart failure due to fixed obstructive coronary artery disease or coronary artery spasm. d. Paragraph 9-12 (Request for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)) states that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009954
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His military records contain a Report of Medical Examination, dated 28 December 2005, for the purpose of his retention, that shows a temporary profile was recommended until a cardiac evaluation was completed. An SF 507 (Medical Record), dated 10 May 2006, shows he was advised on 16 March 2006 of his abnormal EKG and additional information was requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011335
The applicant was honorably discharged from active duty on 25 August 2010 pursuant to Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, based on "other designated physical or mental conditions not amounting to disability," adjustment disorder. In this case the plaintiff had a temporary profile of "4" at the time of his discharge and he was discharged without a separation physical or medical board. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00482
(See DD Form 214, dated 31 Jan 05 at Exhibit B) He was honorably retired from active duty on 1 Feb 05 and was credited with 35 years, 1 month, and 7 days of active service for retirement. At the time of his retirement medical examination, applicant’s medical records reflect a chronic cough with mildly abnormal pulmonary function test, which was over 13 years after his deployment to Kuwait. We found no evidence the applicant was treated for respiratory complaints while deployed to Kuwait in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004931C070205
Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 12-1, Medically unfit for retention, states that Reserve enlisted Soldiers who are no longer qualified for retention by reason of medical unfitness under the standards of AR 40-501, chapter 3 (Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation Including Retirement) will be discharged unless they are granted a waiver of the medical disqualification or are eligible and request transfer to the Retired Reserve under Army Regulation 140-10, paragraph 6- 1. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091071C070212
The applicant provides two letters of explanation to her Senator, dated 24 April 2003 and 27 March 2003; a letter, dated 9 January 1999, from the Command Surgeon, 88th Regional Support Command, Fort Snelling, Minnesota; a physical examination, dated 7 February 1998; a memorandum for Notification of Medical Unfitness for Retention; a memorandum for Medical Duty Review Board Recommendations, dated 9 March 1995; a Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and Earnings Statement,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014049
However, the OTSG stated that there was insufficient medical information to render a medical opinion. In support of her rebuttal the applicant submits a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 15 August 2005 which she signed but was not signed by an authenticating official, requesting she be given Active Duty Medical Extension (ADME); she submits three DA Forms 7574-1 (Military Physician's Statement of Soldier's Incapacitation/Fitness for Duty), which certify the applicant was not fit to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077868C070215
Osteoarthritis is a joint disease that mostly affects the cartilage. People with osteoarthritis usually have joint pain and limited movement. Without clear evidence to show that the applicant did, in fact, injure her hip when she was thrown from a horse, the approved LOD investigation is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant the applicant incapacitation pay or separate her for physical disability.