Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610707C070209
Original file (9610707C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his term of enlistment be changed from 6 to 4 years.

APPLICANT STATES:  That he was told by his recruiter that the loans his parents took out to pay for his education would be paid off under the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) enlistment educational incentive.  After he enlisted, he discovered that those loans were not payable under the LRP.  About the time he discovered that the loans were not payable, he failed the linguistic (Korean) portion of his military occupational specialty (MOS) of 98X1L, Electronic Warfare Signal Intelligence Linguist, requiring him to either be discharged or be reclassified into another MOS.  Although the possibility of being discharged was brought up, he could not seriously consider that option due to financial considerations, since he and his wife had both given up jobs in conjunction with his enlistment.  He was then offered a couple of MOSs which were not consistent with his desires.  When he refused those MOSs, he was offered another MOS within the intelligence field, MOS 98C, Electronic Warfare Signal Intelligence Analyst, but was told that he had to waive his LRP enlistment option to be sent for that training.  Since that offer was made by a command sergeant major, he felt intimidated into accepting.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the USAR Delayed Entry Program on 27 January 1994.  At that time he completed a DA Form 3286-66, Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program, in which he enlisted for the LRP.

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 6 years in pay grade E-4 on 19 May 1994.

On the date the applicant submitted his application to the Board he was serving on active duty in pay grade E-4.

The LRP is an educational enlistment incentive which provides for payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500.00 of the unpaid principal of eligible student loans for each year of active duty a soldier completes, whichever is greater.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 2171, limits loans that are eligible for repayment under the LRP to those made, insured, or guaranteed under the Higher Education Act of 1965.  To be eligible for benefits under this incentive, a soldier must serve a year on active duty in the MOS for which he was given the LRP.

In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM).  The PERSCOM stated that Public Law 99-145 limits loans that are eligible for repayment under the LRP to those made, insured, or guaranteed under the Higher Education Act of 1965.  Therefore, the applicant’s student loans (those made by his parents) are not payable because they were not insured under the Higher Education Act of 1965.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1.  The loans the applicant’s parents made to finance his education are not payable under the LRP.

2.  However, this issue became moot when the applicant failed his training for the MOS for which he received the LRP.  That failure negated any entitlement he had to benefits under the LRP.

3.  Therefore, whether or not the applicant waived his LRP, or whether or not he was intimidated into waiving the LRP, are immaterial.  He had lost entitlement to those benefits before those events occurred.

4.  The applicant was given the option of being discharged when he failed his training.  Since he accepted retention on active duty and has now received training for another MOS, there is no reason to reduce his term of enlistment.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607678C070209

    Original file (9607678C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When a soldier enlists for this option, a DA Form 3286-66 must be completed indicating that he has been promised the LRP, and the soldier must disenroll from the MGIB. The PERSCOM stated that no loans have been paid for the applicant under the LRP, but a note in his file shows that he had informed that office that he has loans which would qualify under the Higher Education Act of 1965, but has not as yet submitted those notes for payment. In the applicant’s case, that form is not present,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087289C070212

    Original file (2003087289C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in essence, that his student loan be paid in accordance with his enlistment option for the Army Student Loan Repayment Program (LRP). In connection with this application, a PERSCOM advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) states, in essence, that terms outlined in the applicant's enlistment contract -- Statement of Understanding US Army Incentive Enlistment Program, DA Form 3286-66, Section 4, item a -- state, "I understand that under the LRP the government will repay a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057145C070420

    Original file (2001057145C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074812C070403

    Original file (2002074812C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records should be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060302C070421

    Original file (2001060302C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106563C070208

    Original file (2004106563C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a statement from his wife; a timeline of events; his DD Form 2475 (DOD Educational Loan Repayment program (LRP) Annual Application); and a letter dated 21 November 2001 from the Chief, Education Incentives and Counseling Branch, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM). The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063428C070421

    Original file (2001063428C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his contract states that the Army would pay all his student loans up to $65,000 and that he provided the necessary paperwork to qualify for this benefit to the service representatives at the time of his enlistment and they told him that his student loans would be paid. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106546C070208

    Original file (2004106546C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there are no Army records that the Board can correct that would allow the repayment of the applicant’s non-qualifying loans under the LRP. In doing so, the applicant's military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence "If a student loan is accepted by the official processing a Soldier for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the Government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057836C070420

    Original file (2001057836C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086767C070212

    Original file (2003086767C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted for the Loan Repayment Program incentive. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show her DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by...