Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609203C070209
Original file (9609203C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  In effect, the applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that he was enlisted in the National Guard on 12 December 1990 in pay grade E-3.  

3.  The applicant states that he was enlisted in pay grade E-1 because his college transcripts were not available showing that he had 60 credit hours of college courses.  He states that he should have been enlisted in pay grade E-3.

4.  The applicant enlisted in the New Jersey Army National Guard on 12 December 1990 and was assigned to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri for basic training.  In April 1991 he was assigned to Fort Lee, Virginia for advanced training.  An undated memorandum to the Personnel Services Center at Fort Lee indicates the applicant’s official transcript from the Electronic College and Computer Program at Hato Rey, Puerto Rico was evaluated and showed that he had completed 80 credit hours of college courses.  This college is an accredited degree-producing college program listed in the Accredited Institutions of Postsecondary Education Book.

5.  The applicant was advanced to the rank and pay grade of private first class E-3 effective 19 June 1991 with a date of rank of 1 February 1991, the date he entered on active duty.  A notation on the instrument of advancement states that the soldier may apply to the ABCMR to adjust the effective date and recoup lost pay.  

6.  The applicant was released from active duty on 
2 July 1991 at Fort Lee, Virginia, and transferred to his National Guard unit.  His pay grade shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 
is E-1.  The applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard on 30 November 1993.     

7.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 prescribes the eligibility criteria governing the enlistment of persons in the Army National Guard.  Table 2-3, rule E, of that regulation states, in effect, that an applicant who has 
successfully completed 60 or more semester hours of an accredited degree-producing college program listed in the Accredited Institutions of Postsecondary Education Book will be enlisted in pay grade E-3.  That table also states that an applicant who lacks the necessary documents at the time of processing for enlistment may present such documents to his personnel officer at any time before completing 
12 months of service.  Advancement will be effective the date of the DA Form 4187; date of rank will be date of enlistment.  To be eligible for back pay, the soldier will be advised of his right to submit a request to the Army Board of Correction of Military Records to adjust his effective date of promotion to his date of enlistment.

8.  In the processing of this case an advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from the Army National Guard Bureau. An official of that agency stated that the applicant should have been advanced to pay grade E-3 on 1 February 1991, the date of his entry on active duty.  That official later agreed, during informal coordination, that that opinion was in error, and that the applicant’s effective date of advancement and date of rank should be 12 December 1990, the date he enlisted in the Army National Guard.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant should have been enlisted in the Army National Guard on 12 December 1990 in pay grade E-3.

2.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual 
concerned enlisted in the Army National Guard on 
12 December 1990 in pay grade E-3 under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, table 2-3, rule E.                 
BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609631C070209

    Original file (9609631C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-20f states, in effect, that an applicant who has successfully completed 60 or more classroom semester hours of an accredited college or university will be enlisted in pay grade E-3. The applicant should have been promoted to pay grade E-3 on 16 June 1995, the date she entered basic training, under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-20l. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072590C070403

    Original file (2002072590C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted on 10 August 2000, and entered the Regular Army in the pay grade of E-3, under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, Chapter 2, paragraph 2-20. Finally, the PERSCOM Chief, Retention Management Division, stated that a review of the records in this case revealed that the applicant was awarded a Bachelor’s degree on 29 July 2000, and therefore was eligible for advance promotion upon enlistment; and he recommended that the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610703C070209

    Original file (9610703C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that her military records be corrected to show that she was enlisted in the Army Reserve on 12 March 1996 in pay grade E-2 or higher. The applicant states she enlisted in the Regular Army from the delayed entry program on 22 April 1996, and during her initial processing for enlistment in the Army Reserve, she provided a diploma and certificate showing that she had 72 college credits, believing her enlisted grade would be E-2 or E-3. The applicant did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508110C070209

    Original file (9508110C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he was enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 2 March 1994, in pay grade E-2. However, since there is no evidence of disciplinary actions and he completed 36 quarter hours during the 1993-1994 Winter and 1993-1994 Spring terms at the Mankato State University, the Board concludes that he should be advanced to pay grade E-2 effective 17 October 1994, the day that he completed 4 months service from the date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023000

    Original file (20110023000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His enlistment contract shows he enlisted as a PFC/E-3 in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 2-18 (Enlistment pay grades for personnel without prior service). c. in paragraph 2-18a(16) when an applicant lacks documentation required for advanced promotion under this paragraph at time of enlistment, they may submit supporting documents to the personnel officer within 6 months of enlistment. As a result of the applicant's request to this Board, he has again gone out and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090231C070212

    Original file (2003090231C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Key among the specifics about the application noted by the Chief, Retention Management Division, are that: the enlistment record failed to reveal any information pertaining to completion of higher education above the 12th grade of high school; the applicant enlisted for the MOS 92A and the Army College Fund ($40,000); under Enlistment Program 9C, AR 601-210, the applicant was eligible for only one of the incentives listed; the enlistment documents failed to reveal any intent by the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610769C070209

    Original file (9610769C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that he was enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 February 1996 in pay grade E-3. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant enlisted in the Army in pay grade E-1 on 2 February 1996. The applicant submitted a copy of two college transcripts with his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509441C070209

    Original file (9509441C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of her military records to show that based on her education her pay grade at the time of her enlistment should have been E-3 rather than E-1. The evidence of the record, shows that the applicant attended a technical institute, however she did not receive a certificate or diploma. Therefore, the applicant did not meet the requirements authorizing enlistment in the grade of E-2 or E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006045

    Original file (20150006045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 May 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150006045 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of a Cameron University transcript from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (currently known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). Transcripts must be from an accredited college or university as verified by the Department of Education to be filed in the OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081743C070215

    Original file (2002081743C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army Reserve on 12 October 2001 for a period of 8 years, in the pay grade of E-1. The applicant's DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) shows she enlisted in the DEP on 12 October 2001 in the pay grade of E-1. PERSCOM stated that a review of the records indicated that the applicant enlisted on 3 January 2002 in the pay grade of E-1.