2. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded.
3. He states that his problems while in the service were all caused by his alcoholism. Despite his obvious alcoholic symptoms, he was never afforded appropriate counseling or rehabilitation. He believes that he would have received an honorable discharge if his alcoholism had been identified and treated.
4. The applicants military records were damaged in the fire at the records repository at St. Louis in 1973. However, most of his military records are still legible.
5. He entered on active duty on 22 August 1956 in pay grade E-1, was awarded the military occupational specialty of a parts specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-3.
6. During the applicants enlistment he was convicted by a summary court-martial of failure to go to his appointed place of duty, and by a special court-martial of incapacitation for the performance of his duties due to indulgence in intoxicating liquor. He also accepted unit punishment twice, once for leaving post without a pass, and once for being absent from reveille.
7. On 29 April 1958 a board of officers was convened to consider the applicant for discharge for Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. The board, after careful deliberation, found the applicant to have undesirable habits and traits of character and recommended that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
8. The findings and recommendations of the board of officers were approved by the assistant adjutant general, a captain, on 7 May 1958, and the applicant was furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate on 21 May 1958. He had completed over 1 year and 9 months of creditable service and had no lost time.
9. Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the policy for administrative separation for Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character. Action to separate an individual was to be taken when, in the judgment of the commander, it was clearly established that rehabilitation was impractical or was unlikely to produce a satisfactory soldier. When separation for undesirability was warranted, an undesirable discharge was normally issued. Paragraph 4 of that regulation, By whom final action taken and discharge ordered, states that Commanding officers exercising general court-martial jurisdiction will take action and order discharge . . .
10. The Manual for Courts-Martial, Section 822, Article 22, states that the following individuals may convene a general courts-martial: (1) the President of the United States (2) the Secretary of Defense (3) the commanding officer of a unified or specified command (4) the Secretary concerned (5) the commanding officer of a Territorial Department, an Army Group, an Army, an Army Corps, a division, or a separate brigade (6) any commanding officer designated by the Secretary concerned or (7) any other commanding officer in any of the armed forces when empowered by the President.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant has not submitted any evidence nor does his file indicate that his undesirable behavior was the result of alcoholism. One court-martial conviction for an alcohol related offense does not necessarily mean that the individual is an alcoholic.
2. However, the applicants undesirable discharge was not approved by a general court-martial convening authority, as required by Army Regulation 635-208. The Board views that omission as a material error which negates the validity of his undesirable discharge.
3. The applicants record of misconduct does not support issuing to him a fully honorable discharge.
4. In view of the foregoing conclusions, the applicants records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was separated from the Army with a General Discharge Certificate on 21 May 1958, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character.
2. That the Department of the Army issue to the individual concerned a General Discharge Certificate from the Army of the United States, dated 21 May 1958, in lieu of the undesirable discharge of the same date now held by him.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008696
On 9 May 1958, the applicant's commander submitted a request that the applicant appear before a board of officers convened under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character) to determine if he should be separated from the Service. On 6 June 1958, the separation authority approved the report of proceedings of the board of officers, ordered the applicant's discharge, and ordered that he be furnished an Undesirable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068951C070402
On 19 February 1959 the applicant’s commanding officer recommended that the applicant be required to appear before a board of officers to determine if he should be discharged for undesirable habits or traits of character under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. Counsel also called the board’s attention to the report of psychiatric evaluation, showing that the applicant had acted out against authority, which could be channeled by correct counseling. The applicant was discharged on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001229C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060001229 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Rowland Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005889
On 11 June 1959, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness) for habits or traits of character manifested by misconduct. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable or a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005480
The examiner recommended that he appear before a Board of Officers to determine whether he should be discharged by reason of unfitness. Army Regulation 635-209 (Personnel Separations Unsuitability), also in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge, provided the policies, procedures, and guidance for the prompt elimination of enlisted personnel who were determined to be unsuitable for further military service. Had he been given a GD in accordance with the regulations at the time of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007115
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 23 November 1957, the company commander requested that the applicant appear before a board of officers to determine whether he should be discharged prior to his expiration term of service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character). Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation from active duty, provided procedures and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003113C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003113 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that he was not court-martialed, but he was taken before a board of officers. On 14 May 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), by unanimous vote, denied the applicant’s request for an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007939
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge. He states that he was told at the time of his discharge that if he stayed out of trouble for six months his discharge would be changed to a general discharge. The board of officers recommended the applicant be discharged from the service because of undesirable habits or traits of character and that he be issued an undesirable discharge certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004305
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to an honorable discharge. However, his reconstructed records contain his DD Form 214 and other documents which are sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004272
On 13 March 1958, the separation authority approved his separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, for unfitness, and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. This regulation prescribed that an individual discharged for unfitness would be furnished an undesirable discharge, except when an honorable or a general discharge was warranted by the particular circumstances. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is...